Peacemakers

OOR4U Kieswijzer Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen 16 maart 2022

16 maart 2022 zijn de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen. Er zijn in Nederland 352 gemeenten. Hier staan ze op een rij met alle kieslijsten.

GEMEENTERAADSVERKIEZING 2022: ALLE GEMEENTEN EN PARTIJEN OP EEN RIJ

Iedereen, stem alsjeblieft! Ook al is er geen één politieke partij wiens mening je deelt, stem dan op een partij waar een afwijkende mening hebben mag! Oftewel, een partij die voor het waarborgen van fundamentele mensenrechten is. Hier zie je welke dat zijn

Om rekening mee te houden bij het stemmen:

Houd je bij het stemmen wel rekening met

  • het stemgedrag van partijen,
  • hoe ze met fundamentele mensenrechten omgaan
  • hoe ze met jeugdzorg en uithuisplaatsingen omgaan

Bij de OOR4U kieswijzer van 2021 zijn ze beoordeeld op de volgende punten:

1. Wie zijn voor het afschaffen van het toetsingsverbod?

2. Wie zijn voor medische vrijheid en dus tegen vaccinatieplicht en tegen elke vorm van vaccinatiediscriminatie: directe of indirecte vaccinatie dwang en tegen een vaccinatie paspoort.

3. Wie zijn tegen jeugdzorg terreur?

4. Wie zijn voor vrijheid van onderwijs en het afschaffen van de schoolplicht?

5.Wie zijn voor de uvrm handhaven en voor een transparant. democratisch Europa met waarboriging van ieder’s individuele vrijheden, maar niet voor een Nexit?

6. Opbouwend: Weten wat er mis is betekent niet dat er ook een positief plan voor de toekomst is. Is dat er?

7. Helder. Een mooi toekomst perspectief is fijn, maar is het ook duuidelijk hoe ze dat willen bereiken? Kloppen de stappen met het beoogde doel?

8.Degelijk: Zijn reputaties ongeschonden of is er moeite gedaan misstappen in het verleden te verklaren? Een volksvertegenwoordiging moet wel representatief zijn.

De partijen van 2021 op volgorde van het aantal “ja’s”, waar ten opzichte van de landelijke verkiezingen vorig jaar een verandering is gekomen vanwege de motie Kuyk:

Dit was hoe erop gestemd werd:

Schema 3
Hier de partijen op volgorde van het aantal “ja’s”Aantal ja’s op de eerste 8 vragen per partij, (en op welke vragen is het “ja”?)
1Hart voor Vrijheid(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
219. Piratenpartij8 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
332. DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)5 (1,2,3,4,5)
414. BIJ15 (1, 3,4,5,8)
523. BBB(1,2,3, 6,7)
629. U-Buntu Connected Front(2,3,4,5,6)
726. OPRECHT(2,3,6,7,8)
833. Vrij en Sociaal Nederland4 (1,2,3,5)
913. Forum voor Democratie4(2,3,6,7)
1021. JONG4 (2,3,5,8)
1120. LP (Libertaire Partij)4 (4, 6,7,8)
1212. DENK4 (1, 2,3, 4)
1325. Lijst Henk Krol3(2, 3, 5)
1411. Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)3 (1,2,4)
158. ChristenUnie(1,3,5)
167. Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)3 (1,5,8)
1715. JA21(1,7,8)
1827. JEZUS LEEFT(4,5,8)
1917. Volt(1, 6,7,8)
209. Partij voor de Dieren(1,6,7,8)
2110. 50PLUS(1,3,5)
2216. CODE ORANJE(7,8)
2322. Splinter2 (7,8)
2424. NLBeter(7,8)
254. D66(1)
265. GROENLINKS(1)
276. SP (Socialistische Partij)(1)
282. PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)(2)
2936. De Groenen(8)
303. CDA,1(1)
301. VVD, 0
31-3718. NIDA 28. Trots op Nederland (TROTS), 31. Partij van de Eenheid 35. Modern Nederland 37. Partij voor de Republiek 34. Wij zijn Nederlandonduidelijk

Hier de spreadsheet

Er zijn 352 gemeenten in Nederland, dus dat wordt een beetje omslachtig om daar alle kandidaten van op een rij te zetten. Ik kan wel kijken waar de top 5 op de lijst staat:

Dit zijn de gemeenten waar Hart voor Vrijheid op de kieslijst staat:

Dit zijn de gemeenten waar de Piraten Partij op de kieslijst staat:

GEMEENTERAADSVERKIEZINGEN 2022

De Piratenpartij doet mee in:

  1. Amsterdam samen met De Groenen en de Basisinkomenpartij
  2. Delft in samenwerking met STIP
  3. Eindhoven
  4. Enkhuizen
  5. Middelburg
  6. Nijmegen
  7. Utrecht

Op de pagina van De FeestPartij zie ik geen overzicht van gemeenten waar ze verkiesbaar zijn.

BBB is in de volgende gemeente op de lijst

Aangesloten BBBondgenoten

1. Gemeente Aalten

Henk Meerdink Volksvertegenwoordiging

2. Gemeente Amstelveen

Actief voor Amstelveen

3. Gemeente Berkelland

Ondernemend Berkelland (OBL)

4. Gemeente De Fryske Marren

Kleurrijk Fryske Marren

5. Gemeente Deventer

DeventerNU

6. Gemeente Goeree-Overflakkee

Groep Jan Zwerus

7. Gemeente Haarlem

Trots op Haarlem

8. Gemeente Het Hogeland

Hogeland Lokaal Centraal

9. Gemeente Heusden

Heusden Verbindt

10. Gemeente Lochem

Meedenken met Lochem

11. Gemeente Midden-Drenthe

Gemeentebelangen Midden-Drenthe

12. Gemeente Midden-Groningen

Leefbaar Midden Groningen

13. Gemeente Moerdijk

Burger Belangen Moerdijk

14. Gemeente Oude IJsselstreek

Dorps- en Plattelandsbeweging

15. Gemeente Rhenen

Trots op Rhenen

16. Gemeente Someren

Lijst Someren-Heide

17. Gemeente Súdwest-Fryslân

Volkspartij in Nederlands Belang

18. Gemeente West Betuwe

Leefbaar Lokaal Belang (LLB)

19. Gemeente Westerkwartier

VZ Westerkwartier

20. Gemeente Wijk bij Duurstede

Duurstede voor Democratie

PIT, de partij van Pieter Omtzigtdoet mee in Sittard-Geleen

Vraag en Antwoord:

Vraag: Wat doe je als geen van die partijen in mijn gemeente vertegenwoordigd is?

Antwoord: Kijken welke het dichtste bij komt. Heb je deze al bekeken?https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2022/03/04/oor4u-kieswijzer-gemeenteraadsverkiezingen-16-maart-2022/ Je kan ook de acht vragen loslaten op lokale partijen en kijken hoe die het doen. Ze eventueel persoonlijk aanspreken op hun integriteit. Iedereen heeft een geweten, en mensen geven niet graag toe dat ze fundamentele mensenrechten aan hun laars lappen. Het ter discussie stellen kan al veel doen. Of vragen of één van de oprechte partijen een tak opzet in jouw gemeente. Of zelf een partij oprichten. Er zijn vast nog meer oplossingen te bedenken, maar dit is waar ik zo even op kom. Veel succes!

Vraag 1: Met stemmen is het net als met oorlog: STEL ER GAAT NIEMAND.?

Antwoord: Om te weten wat er gebeurt als niemand gaat stemmen hoef je maar te kijken naar landen waar geen stemrecht is. Dat heten dictaturen. Dat is niet fijn leven. Of sla een geschiedenisboek open en zie hoe het ging voor er stemrecht was. Is niet om vrolijk van te worden. Dat de democratie nu niet naar behoren functioneert is vanwege het toetsingsverbod waardoor fundamentele mensenrechten niet gewaarborgd zijn. Daarom moeten we nu massaal stemmen op partijen die voor het afschaffen van het toetsingsverbod zijn. Hier zie je welke dat zijn. https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2022/03/04/oor4u-kieswijzer-gemeenteraadsverkiezingen-16-maart-2022/

Vraag 2: En wij leven, met stemrecht , niet in een dictatuur?? Waar met zgn ‘spoedwetten”alle rechten van mensen worden afgenomen in naam van een NIET bestaande p(l)andemie? Stemrecht is in mijn optiek enkel zeer aan te bevelen als het kleinschalig gebeurt, dan heb je voeling met de gekozenen. En juist dáárom zijn de globalisten zo vóór GROOTschalig zodat we die voeling volledig kwijtraken en niet meer weten en voelen wat er met ons en onze rechten (EN plichten) gebeurt.

Antwoord: Een niet geheel goed functionerende democratie is wel heel wat anders dan een dictatuur. En als het toetsingsverbod zou worden afgeschaft, zoals met de motie Kuik weer actueel is gemaakt, zou het een goed functionerende democratie kunnen worden. Hier kan je zien welke partijen daar voor en welke tegen hebben gestemd, en het stemgedrag van alle partijen. https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2021/02/23/stemgedrag-nederlandse-partijen/

Vraag 3:“een niet goed functionerende democratie”vind ik het understatement van het jaar. Mensen zijn in zgn”democratische”landen opgesloten in hun huizen, oude mensen zijn eenzaam gestorven, kinderen lijden onder de absurde maatregelen, het MKB is kapot gemaakt, er wordt staatspropaganda gemaakt voor inspuiting met gif. Ik heb ruim 30 jaar ervaring in de politiek, ben gemeenteraadslid geweest en het is één groot opportunistisch circus. Dus wég ermee en OP naar kleinschaligheid waar je als MENS wél iets te vertellen hebt en waar er naar je geluisterd wordt.

Antwoord: Hoezo is kleinschaligheid in tegenspraak met democratie? Ook dat is toch democratisch te regelen? Hoe zie je dat voor je, kleinschaligheid zonder democratie? Hoe hebben mensen dan nog inspraak?

Vraag 4:“Koppel je eerst eens los van het woord democratie. Ga eens opzoeken wat het werkelijk betekent. Juist zónder dat systeem is er werkelijk sprake van inspraak. The-powers-that-be plunderen onder het mom van invoeren van “democratie” hele continenten volledig leeg. Tussen de 3- en 5000 multi miljardairs bezitten 50.000 MILJARD en er zijn 7,8 miljard bewoners op deze planeet…….I rest my case.

Antwoord: “Democratie (van het Grieks δῆμος/dèmos, “volk” en κρατειν/kratein, “heersen”, dus letterlijk “volksheerschappij”) is een bestuursvorm waarin de wil van het volk de bron is van legitieme machtsuitoefening. Men onderscheidt directe democratie, waarin burgers persoonlijk stemmen over wetten, besluiten en benoemingen, en indirecte, waarin het volk zich laat vertegenwoordigen door een gekozen orgaan, zoals een raad of parlement.”https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratie Goed dat je al die cijfers weet. Dat is ook dankzij democratie en de wet openbaar bestuur. Dat heb je niet in dictaturen. Dictaturen hebben geen enkele verplichting zich te houden aan fundamentele mensenrechten (zie https://uvrm.wordpress.com/universal-declaration-of-human-rights-universele-verklaring-van-de-rechten-van-de-mens-10-december-1948/) , en geen enkele verplichting mensen die ze bekritiseren een humane behandeling te geven. Dat zo’n discussie als wij hier hebben veilig kan is vanwege het waarborgen van fundamentele mensenrechten, wat de norm is in democratieën. Dat waarborgen zou beter kunnen. Maar hoeveel er ook op aan te merken is, het is vele malen beter dan in welke dictatuur ook. Als de motie Kuik aangenomen wordt zouden de fundamentele mensenrechten nog beter gewaarborgd worden. Zie https://uvrm.wordpress.com/schaf-het-toetsingsverbod-af/ Daarom hoop ik dat iedereen gaat stemmen op partijen die voor de motie Kuik gestemd hebben. Hier zie je welke dat zijn https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2022/03/04/oor4u-kieswijzer-gemeenteraadsverkiezingen-16-maart-2022/

Vraag 5: Welke “democratie”heeft Irak nu en Libië, Yemen, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Chili, Peru, Colombia, Nepal. Welke democratie hebben de VS naar Vietnam gebracht, naar Laos en Cambodja?

Antwoord: Als fundamentele mensenrechten niet gewaarborgd worden functioneren democratieën niet en worden het dictaturen. Dat is alleen maar op te lossen door te staan op het waarborgen van fundamentele mensenrechten. Zo is elk recht ontstaan, en zo blijft elk recht bestaan. Stoppen mensen met dat actief bij te houden vervalt een democratie tot een dictatuur, net als een tuin die niet wordt bijgehouden wordt overwoekerd door onkruid.

Nog toevoegingen, op of aanmerkingen?

Zet het in het commentaar hieronder!

Alvast bedankt!

Bronnen:

https://www.kiesraad.nl/verkiezingen/gemeenteraden

https://www.kiesraad.nl/verkiezingen/gemeenteraden/stembureau

https://www.kiesraad.nl/verkiezingen/gemeenteraden/stembureau/openingstijden

https://www.bnr.nl/nieuws/politiek/10467061/gemeenteraadsverkiezing-2022-alle-gemeenten-en-partijen-op-een-rij

Stemgedrag Nederlandse Partijen

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/gemeenten/gemeentelijke-herindeling

https://www.politiekmetpit.nl/

Een keer in de vier jaar vinden in Nederland gemeenteraadsverkiezingen plaats. De volgende gemeenteraadsverkiezingen zijn op woensdag 16 maart 2022. De laatste gemeenteraadsverkiezingen waren op 21 maart 2018.

Stembureaus

Het college van burgemeester en wethouders van elke gemeente is verantwoordelijk voor het regelen van stembureaus. Bij de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen in 2018 waren er 8.699 stembureaus.

De hoofdregel is dat stembureaus op de dag van stemming open zijn van 07.30 uur ‘s ochtends tot 21.00 uur in de avond. Wel zijn voor zogeheten bijzondere stembureaus en voor mobiele stembureaus afwijkende openingstijden mogelijk. Zij kunnen eerder of later open gaan, en eerder (niet later) sluiten.

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Media, Peacemakers

Why I love facebook, and why I think Mark Zuckerberg is a hero

I find the the attacks on facebook and Mark Zuckerberg very unfair. Listen to them:

These are also very mean attacks:

Who are these people who are attacking Mark Zuckerberg, and making causal connections out of parallel connections?

This is the whistle blower Frances Haugen on 60 minutes

The following is supposed to be Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen testifying in the US senate. But you only hear a senator talking. Not her. And the allegations are vague. As if seeing your family and friends on facebook now is worse for self acceptance than the magazines, models and movie stars of the pre internet era.

And calling facebook the most powerful entity ever? That s what Senator Richard Blumenthal says. Give me a break. That is such an exaggeration its embarrassing.

I m guessing he is on Pfizer s pay role, and his tweets are very pro Pfizer too


Ri

As you can see later onPfizer is one of the companies that boycotted facebook;

Lonely people may look on facebook a lot. That does not mean facebook makes people lonely.

No, Mark Zuckerberg is not facebook’ s biggest problem.

https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/why-facebooks-biggest-problem-isnt-fake-news-or-privacy-its-mark-zuckerberg.html

If you want to see how great facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are, check the list of companies that withdrew their advertising from facebook:

(Reuters) – A long list of companies have pulled advertising from Facebook Inc in support of a campaign that called out the social media giant for not doing enough to stop hate speech on its platforms.FILE PHOTO: A worker puts away patio furniture at a Starbucks Corp drive-through location closes down this afternoon in the U.S. including this location in Oceanside, California, U,S. May 29, 2018. REUTERS/Mike Blake

The Stop Hate for Profit campaign was started by several U.S. civil rights groups after the death of African-American George Floyd in police custody triggered widespread protests against racial discrimination in the United States.

Following are some of the companies that have decided to support the campaign:

Starbucks Corp

The U.S. coffee chain said it would pause advertising on all social media platforms while it continues discussions internally, with media partners and civil rights organizations. (bit.ly/2CS8lTC)

Unilever Plc

The consumer goods company said it will stop advertising on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter in the United States for the rest of the year, citing “divisiveness and hate speech during this polarized election period in the U.S.”

Adidas AG

The German sportswear giant said it and subsidiary Reebok will pause advertising on Facebook and Instagram globally throughout July.

Coca-Cola Co

The beverage maker will pause paid advertising on all social media platforms globally for at least 30 days, Chief Executive Officer James Quincey said in a statement. (bit.ly/2NFvDOA)

Merck & Co

The drugmaker said it was stopping ads on Facebook and Instagram and was monitoring the actions Facebook takes.

Target Corp

The retailer said it was pausing all ads on Facebook and Instagram throughout July and was re-evaluating its plans for the rest of the year.

Ford Motor Co

The No. 2 U.S. automaker said it would pause advertising on all social media platforms in the United States for 30 days, adding that it would evaluate such spending in other regions as well.

HP Inc

The computer maker said it was stopping U.S. advertising on Facebook until the platform puts more robust safeguards in place against objectionable content. It added that it was reviewing its social media strategy across all markets and platforms.

Lululemon Athletica Inc

The yogawear maker said it would pause paid advertising on Facebook and Instagram. (bit.ly/2Vre3lC)

Levi Strauss & Co

The denim maker said it and subsidiary Dockers would pausing all ads on Facebook and Instagram, calling on the social media company to take actions to stop misinformation and hate speech. (bit.ly/2VsQZ6g)

Beiersdorf AG

The Nivea cream maker said it was pausing ads for all its brands on Facebook and Instagram throughout July.

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc

Chipotle said it was temporarily pausing paid advertising on Facebook and Instagram starting July 1.

Diageo Plc

The world’s largest spirits maker will pause all paid advertising globally on major social media platforms from July 1. (bit.ly/2AcpOFd)

Clorox Co

The bleach maker said it will stop advertising spending with Facebook through December.

Verizon Communications Inc

The telecom operator said it was pausing advertising until Facebook creates “an acceptable solution that makes us comfortable”.

The North Face

The outdoor brand, a unit of VF Corp, said it would pull out of all Facebook-owned platforms. (bit.ly/3eyboy4)

Ben & Jerry’s

The ice-cream maker said it would pause all paid advertising on Facebook and Instagram in the United States as of July 1. (benjerrys.co/3ds0IzF)

Magnolia Pictures

The film distributor and studio became the first Hollywood company to join the movement. The company said in a tweet it would stop advertising on Facebook and Instagram, starting immediately, through at least the end of July. (bit.ly/2NrJg44)

Patagonia

The outdoor apparel brand said it would pull all ads on Facebook and Instagram through at least the end of July. (bit.ly/2ND3VCl)

Reporting by Nivedita Balu, Uday Sampath and Dania Nadeem in Bengaluru; Editing by Sweta Singh, Maju Samuel, Shounak Dasgupta, Vinay Dwivedi & Aditya Son

This is how facebook started out:

He has good morals and is always speaking out for human rights.

Like here

He is smart, and thoughtful and caring.

And now he is often speaking out for fundamental human rights.

Thanks to facebook you can keep in touch with friends, share your pictures and news and see their pictures and follow their lives in a non intrusive way.

Blaming social media for teen suicides is like blaming telephones for suicides.

I think facebook prevents deaths, it does not cause them.

Facebook is an excellent way for staying in touch with others. it makes things possible for the poorest of the poor that would otherwise only be available to the richest of the rich.

And that’s what I think the real problem of these critics is.

They want communication and connection to only be available to the richest of the rich.

Saying that facebook causes the same reactions as gambling does, is ignoring that behavior is only a problem when it is harmful to your health.

Facebook is not bad for your health.

It s a way for normal people to connect.

I hope people stop attacking Mark Zuckerberg for things that are not his fault.

Facebook is excellent, and so is he.

Also here

And precisely for standing up for fundamental human rights he has made some very powerful enemies.

I hope those who are for fundamental human rights see what this is: vaccine pushers punishing Mark Zuckerberg for giving people who the pharmaceutical industry would rather silence a voice.

I hope people wake up and stand behind Mark Zuckerberg!

Sources:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-ads-boycott-factbox-idUSKBN2433CL

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/17/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-free-expression-speech

How facebook started out. Mark came a long way.

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Fundemental Human Rights, Peacemakers

Science and Sentience

In 2012 Science finally officially recognized what every child knows from birth: Animals are sentient beings

animal ethics writes:

7 Jul 2017

Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness

Five years ago, on July 7, 2012, a prominent group of scientists signed the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. This declaration stated that not only humans, but also a significant amount of animals, including not just vertebrates but also many invertebrates, are conscious beings.

What this means is that they are sentient, that is, they experience what happens to them and have mental states which can be positive or negative for them.

The evidence to support this claim is overwhelming. As the declaration itself stated:

Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Nonhuman animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also possess these neurological substrates.”

This is very relevant because the capacity to have positive and negative experiences is what makes a being capable of being harmed. There are powerful reasons to conclude that this is what should matter when it comes to giving someone moral consideration and not discriminating against that being.

To be sure, all the evidence concluding that nonhuman animals are sentient was there already before the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness was proclaimed in 2012. However, this declaration made it possible to state beyond reasonable objections that there is a (long overdue) scientific consensus about this issue. This is what made this declaration so important.

You can read the whole text of the declaration here:

The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness


*
On this day of July 7, 2012, a prominent international group of cognitive neuroscientists,
neuropharmacologists, neurophysiologists, neuroanatomists and computational neuroscientists
gathered at The University of Cambridge to reassess the neurobiological substrates of conscious
experience and related behaviors in human and non-human animals. While comparative research on
this topic is naturally hampered by the inability of non-human animals, and often humans, to clearly
and readily communicate about their internal states, the following observations can be stated
unequivocally:
 The field of Consciousness research is rapidly evolving. Abundant new techniques and strategies
for human and non-human animal research have been developed. Consequently, more data is
becoming readily available, and this calls for a periodic reevaluation of previously held
preconceptions in this field. Studies of non-human animals have shown that homologous brain
circuits correlated with conscious experience and perception can be selectively facilitated and
disrupted to assess whether they are in fact necessary for those experiences. Moreover, in
humans, new non-invasive techniques are readily available to survey the correlates of
consciousness.
 The neural substrates of emotions do not appear to be confined to cortical structures. In fact,
subcortical neural networks aroused during affective states in humans are also critically
important for generating emotional behaviors in animals. Artificial arousal of the same brain
regions generates corresponding behavior and feeling states in both humans and non-human
animals. Wherever in the brain one evokes instinctual emotional behaviors in non-human
animals, many of the ensuing behaviors are consistent with experienced feeling states, including
those internal states that are rewarding and punishing. Deep brain stimulation of these systems
in humans can also generate similar affective states. Systems associated with affect are
concentrated in subcortical regions where neural homologies abound. Young human and nonhuman animals without neocortices retain these brain-mind functions. Furthermore, neural
circuits supporting behavioral/electrophysiological states of attentiveness, sleep and decision
making appear to have arisen in evolution as early as the invertebrate radiation, being evident in
insects and cephalopod mollusks (e.g., octopus).
 Birds appear to offer, in their behavior, neurophysiology, and neuroanatomy a striking case of
parallel evolution of consciousness. Evidence of near human-like levels of consciousness has
been most dramatically observed in African grey parrots. Mammalian and avian emotional
networks and cognitive microcircuitries appear to be far more homologous than previously
thought. Moreover, certain species of birds have been found to exhibit neural sleep patterns
similar to those of mammals, including REM sleep and, as was demonstrated in zebra finches,
neurophysiological patterns, previously thought to require a mammalian neocortex. Magpies in
particular have been shown to exhibit striking similarities to humans, great apes, dolphins, and
elephants in studies of mirror self-recognition.
 In humans, the effect of certain hallucinogens appears to be associated with a disruption in
cortical feedforward and feedback processing. Pharmacological interventions in non-human
animals with compounds known to affect conscious behavior in humans can lead to similar
perturbations in behavior in non-human animals. In humans, there is evidence to suggest that
awareness is correlated with cortical activity, which does not exclude possible contributions by
subcortical or early cortical processing, as in visual awareness. Evidence that human and nonhuman animal emotional feelings arise from homologous subcortical brain networks provide
compelling evidence for evolutionarily shared primal affective qualia.
We declare the following: “The absence of a neocortex does not appear to preclude an organism from
experiencing affective states. Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the
neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with
the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that
humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Nonhuman animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also
possess these neurological substrates.”

Darwin already knew it:

May be an image of 1 person, beard and text that says '"THERE IS NO FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMALS IN THEIR ABILITY TO FEEL TO PLEASURE AND PAIN, HAPPINESS, AND MISERY." -Charles Darwin @brettsvegan'

You have to be a little dead on the inside not to realize how sensitive animals are, how they need our love and care as we thrive by their companionship.

So why are people so quick to determine that other beings don’t feel ?

Is it so they don’t have any obligations towards them? So they can freely scapegoat them? So they can freely take credit for all they do to them pass the blame on to them for all they themselves do wrong?

Why live a fruitful and positive life and put in all the effort it takes to be a sincere person if you can just live a worthless and lazy life and pretend to be what you are not?

Do we need to deny animals their sensitivity so we can feel superior?

And are we not doing the same with plants?

How long will it take before it is recognized they are sentient beings as well. Something all sensitive people feel also.

My advice, don’t wait until science finds evidence, but treat them as such now. It will make all our lives do much richer and better.

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Covid19

Notes on Celeste Bishop Solum

Sometimes useful information is mixed in with illogical and outlandish information. I find that to be the case with Celeste Bishop Solum. I first listen to all they have to say, then I pick out the useful information and take note of the other information, which, if not scientific, can be useful in other ways, if not just to see what they would have is believe:

Celeste Solum speaks with David Ike

Celeste comes from a military household. Her father was disgusted with the corruption and became a private consultant. Her father warned her for the changes we are experiencing today, so she made it her life’s mission to prepare for that and warn others. Her wide range of knowledge and experience has made her able to connect the dots and pass that on.

This is what she says in this interview:

Everyone who has had a Covid test has been tagged.

The WEF had a conference in November 2020 about integrating technology with humanity.

This is a plan that was made during the asilomar meetings.

Asilomar and Recombinant DNA: The End of the Beginning

The first Asilomar meeting was in 1975, the third and last last was in 2018, and that is driving all the events.

https://ibol.org/L

ibol is a plan to barcode all life.

DNA barcoding as global identification method for biological species.

They change light and they ant to change the nature of all life.

Her websiteL

https://celestialreport.com/

She says to look up restructuring of light:

Significant restructuring and light absorption enhancement of black carbon particles by ammonium nitrate coating

Phylo code

Restructuring of life so they can patent all life. Muxing and matching of all life forms, so there will be no pure life form anymore.

Every May it is updated.

Humans considered animals like birds and Dinosaurs. 1500 pages. Terrestual animals includes humans.

Depopulation manuals called “stamping out.”

MANUAL ON PROCEDURES
FOR DISEASE ERADICATION
BY STAMPING OUT

Your doctor can get paid for your execution by stabbing (vaccine), gassing and beheading.

The covid is the first step for a new life form.

Covid is fusing biological life and robotics, with the goal of extermination.

By 2025 they want ti have all biological humans irradiated and all humans bio engineered.

They want to eradicate all life that is not made in a laboratory.

Aborted children are used in food.

There are human genes in rice, tomatoes, It is for making people cannibals.

‘Human barcode’ could invade privacy and civil liberties

BarCode of Life

ibol is Rockerfeller and IBM

Aldevron

Aldevron The First To Rapidly Discover Human Antibodies Using Ligands Omnirat® Platform And Berkeley Lights Beacon® Instrument

They are magnetically tagging anyone who takes the corona virus test.

The genetic modification is passed ib from parent to child.

They can watch us in real time as our bodies are swallowed up by synthetic entities for everyone who took the cobid test, thanks to fluorescent nano particals.

Real-time magnetic actuation of DNA nanodevices via modular integration with stiff micro-levers

Darpa wanted to put chops in everyones brains without surgery. So they came up with a gel. This is called hydrogel or quantum dot.

It assembles and swarms through your body, 33 different classifications of robots deployed in your body. t can target one cell, a body, you, everyone with bond hair, everyone with a certain faith, scalable, flexible. They hold your cel until it is slowed up by the syb vio. Then it swarms and crosses your blood brain barrier and takes over your brain.

James Carson, told a mother that her daughters brain was glue.

Hydrogel or quantum dot: baloon that’s growing. It harvests your fluids. Sucjs out our moisture. And it grows, and we are no longer human, and the biological self dies. It takes over the human body.

Some of the covid tests contain it.

Vaccines contain a high dose.

They want more doses to make sure you are taken over.

The only way to avoid it is to say no to the test and the vaccination.

High extinction level each 12000 years.

Magnetic nano particles and they amplif the frequencies.

The nano particles have hollow bellies and can carry anything. More explosive than tnt.

The frequency gives the particle its marching orders.

Coagulation of the blood stream.

They are out for the brain.

Pierce the blood brain barrier.

The hydrogel straight into the brain. Then it starts to take over the brain.. Cognition will be impaired until people become jelly fish.

optofluidic analysis,

If you see strange names in the ingredients don’t use it. You cannot get it out of your body once you get it in.

Celeste Bishop Solum

Some thoughts:

Whil I also striongly recommend not being tested, since it makes no sense, I don’t believe that nanogel is being shoved up our noses when we are tested. It just makes no sense. Why would they do all these things? It seems like an overkill. I find it helps to stick to scientifically proven facts., like that the vaccine causes prions, as explained in The truth about the Corona vaccines.

I think corrupt vaccine makers would love us to go chasing fictitious aliens rather than paying attention to what they are doing and doing something about that. I think they love it if we feel overwhelmed and powerless. So either Celeste really believes all she says, or she is being used.

I also think it’s a controlled opposition trick to mix the truth with outrageous falsehoods, so whoever says the truth will also say the outrageous falsehoods and no one takes them seriously. Another way to accept the mark of the beast is to adopt falsehoods.

It simply makes no sense. If the nano particles are already in the test, why would we need the vaccines?

So either this is an elaborate hoax, or there is something to it, but then I think it is way different from what Celeste says here.,

For example, if we are considered rats, why would they want to make us artificial.

It would make sense they would want to brand us and monitor our health, so we can act as organ hosts for them until they have figured out how to grow their own organs. Beats going raiding Indian towns and stealing organs from mal nourished poor people.

It also would make sense that they would harvest our DNA to keep their gene pool diverse for procreation.

In order to understand an enemy, you have to put yourself in the shoes of an evil mind.

They want to make earth paradise for them, and we are the pests they want to control, that much is clear.

But I dob’t think they are aliens, and I certainly don’t think thy are unbeatable.

The thing with evil people is that they are going against their maker, and that will always give some unrest. they al;ways have something to hide, and that makes them weak. So whereas we get energy from fighting for what is right, they disgust and exhaust themselves.

We should not think we can’t win. We can only win, and they have already lost. We are all the creation of our heavenly Father, but only His children if we do His will, which is doing for others what we would wish they would do for us. By treating us as pests, they are treating Yeshua as a pest, and their judgment is coming. What they have done to the least of His brothers or sisters, they have done to Him.

So don’t be scared, be bold, and beat this Yeshua’s way.

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Covid19, Verkiezingen

Stemgedrag Nederlandse Partijen

De motie-Azarkan over geen coronavaccinatieplicht (25295.nr. 676)

De motie van Haga over kinderen uitzonderen van test- en quarantainemaatregelen:

De motie Krol over de situatie in Nederland zo normaal maken dat Wilders zonder bewaking over straat kan fietsen.

21. Tijdelijke bepalingen in verband met maatregelen ter bestrijding van de pandemie van covid 19 voor de langere termijn .

Motie van Haga Krol over monitoren bijwerkingen Corona vaccins: verworpen!

Motie Jetten over zo snel mogelijk invoeren Corona paspoort.

De motie Wilders over restaurants openhouden.

De motie Wiulders over geen belangen in de ontwikkeling van een corona vaccina.

De motie Rawmakers/Diertens over opnemen van de griepprik in de arbeidsvoorwaarden.

De motie Azarkan over toefang tot publieke voorzieningen voor iedereen ongeacht vaccinatie-of teststatus.

De motie Van Haga/Baudet over niet akkoord gaan met de invoering van een vaccinatiepaspoort.

Wat stemt Lijst30 - Lijst30

De motie Kuzu/ van Haga over een Nationaal Herstelplan voor de horeca (25295, nr. 1157).

22 april 2021

Motie Kuik voor het afschaffen van het toetsingsverbod, 29 april 2021

Met het afschaffen van het toetsingsverbod zijn we nog nooit zo dichtbij de vrijheid geweest als nu! Zie https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=4194777253886368&set=a.314254681938664 Het toetsingsverbod is hetgeen wat stond tussen ons en onze fundamentele mensenrechten. Zie https://www.facebook.com/schafhettoetsingsverbodaf/photos/a.867744273292572/956634687736863 Let alsjeblieft ook even op de stemuitslag: https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/moties De tegenstemmers waren FVD, SGP, VVD en PVV!

De motie Azarkan over toegang tot publieke voorzieningen ongeacht, vaccinatie of teststatus. (25295. nr. 864)

Motie van het lid Van Houwelingen over het coronatoegangsbewijs nooit invoeren in essentiële voorzieningen

DownloadDownload

Indieners

Indiener
Pepijn van Houwelingen, Kamerlid Forum voor Democratie

20211108

May be an image of text that says 'www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid =47646317197908se=.76654631719 de motie-Van Houwelingen over het coronatoegangsbewijs nooit invoeren in essentiële voorzieningen (35899, nr. 7) VERWORPEN SP BIJ1 GL DENK PvdD Volt PvdA Fractie Den Ha CU SGP CDA BBB FVD D66 VVD Lid Omtzigt JA21 PVV Gr Van Haga'

No photo description available.

Motie van het lid Van Houwelingen over geen boetes of opsluiting voor ongevaccineerden

Motie van het lid Kuzu over uitspreken dat bedrijven vaccinatieplicht niet kunnen opleggen als voorwaarde voor hun werknemers

De EU wil het Digitaal Covid Certificaat met 12 maanden verlengen, tot 30 juni 2023. #BVNL is hier fel op tegen. Er is geen enkele reden voor een Europese ‘gezondheidspas’. Dit heeft niets meer met gezondheid te maken, maar alles met controle

Wet tot verplaatsing van de bevolking.

Zie ook

https://www.easystemwijzer.com/

Zie Hoe zou Lijst30 stemmen?

OOR4U Kieswijzer

Terug naar top

Terug naar Index

Standard
Fundamentele mensenrechten voor kinderen en gezinnen in Nederland

OOR4U Kieswijzer 2021

Klik hier voor de OOR4U Kieswijzer met alle kandidaten voor de verkiezingen van 17 maart 2021

Dit zijn de 37 partijen die meedoen aan de Tweede Kamer Verkiezingen 17 maart 2021

1. VVD

2. PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)

3. CDA

4. D66

5. GROENLINKS

6. SP (Socialistische Partij)

7. Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)

8. ChristenUnie

9. Partij voor de Dieren

10. 50PLUS

11. Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)

12. DENK

13. Forum voor Democratie

14. BIJ1

15. JA21

16. CODE ORANJE

17. Volt

18. NIDA

19. Piratenpartij

20. LP (Libertaire Partij)

21. JONG

22. Splinter

23. BBB

24. NLBeter

25. Lijst Henk Krol

26. OPRECHT

27. JEZUS LEEFT

28. Trots op Nederland (TROTS)

29. U-Buntu Connected Front

30. Blanco lijst met als eerste kandidaat Zeven, A.J.L.B. (zie Hart voor Vrijheid)

31. Partij van de Eenheid

32. DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)

33. Vrij en Sociaal Nederland

34. Wij zijn Nederland

35. Modern Nederland

36. De Groenen

37. Partij voor de Republiek

https://www.kiesraad.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/02/05/37-partijen-nemen-deel-aan-tweede-kamerverkiezing

Nu even uitzoeken:

1. Wie zijn voor het afschaffen van het toetsingsverbod?

2. Wie zijn voor medische vrijheid en dus tegen vaccinatieplicht en tegen elke vorm van vaccinatiediscriminatie: directe of indirecte vaccinatie dwang en tegen een vaccinatie paspoort.

3. Wie zijn tegen jeugdzorg terreur?

4. Wie zijn voor vrijheid van onderwijs en het afschaffen van de schoolplicht?

5.Wie zijn voor de uvrm handhaven en voor een transparant. democratisch Europa met waarboriging van ieder’s individuele vrijheden, maar niet voor een Nexit?

6. Opbouwend: Weten wat er mis is betekent niet dat er ook een positief plan voor de toekomst is. Is dat er?

7. Helder. Een mooi toekomst perspectief is fijn, maar is het ook duuidelijk hoe ze dat willen bereiken? Kloppen de stappen met het beoogde doel?

8.Degelijk: Zijn reputaties ongeschonden of is er moeite gedaan misstappen in het verleden te verklaren? Een volksvertegenwoordiging moet wel representatief zijn.

Je vindt deze op de spreadsheet weergegeven in 3 schema’s

Schema 1 gaat gewoon het rijtje partijen af en beantwoordt deze vragen met ja of nee, voornamelijk gebaseerd op hun partij programma en stemgedtag.

Schema 2: Zet per vraag de partijen die daar ja op zeggen

Schema 3: Zet de partijen op volgorde van het aantal “ja’s.”

Dat zijn mijn voorwaarden. Wat zijn de jouwe?

En vind ik er één die aan al deze voorwaarden voldoet, kunnen we er deze ook wel bij halen:

https://uvrm.wordpress.com/oor4u-dienstbaarheidsideeen/

Aantal ja’s op de eerste 8 vragen per partij, (en op welke vragen is het “ja”?)

Schema 1
Geldige kandidatenlijsten:
De Kiesraad verklaarde de kandidatenlijsten van de volgende partijen geldig, en nummerde deze als volgt:Aantal ja’s op de eerste 8 vragen per partij, (en op welke vragen is het “ja”?)
1. VVD 0
2. PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)1 (2)
3. CDA0
4. D661 (1)
5. GROENLINKS1 (1)
6. SP (Socialistische Partij)1 (1)
7. Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)3 (1,5,8)
8. ChristenUnie3 (1,3,5)
9. Partij voor de Dieren3 (6,7,8)
10. 50PLUS2 (3,5)
11. Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)3 (1,2,4)
12. DENK3 (2,3, 4)
13. Forum voor Democratie4(2,3,6,7)
14. BIJ14 (3,4,5,8)
15. JA213 (1,7,8)
16. CODE ORANJE2 (7,8)
17. Volt3 (6,7,8)
18. NIDAonduidelijk
19. Piratenpartij8 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
20. LP (Libertaire Partij)4 (4, 6,7,8)
21. JONG4 (2,3,5,8)
22. Splinter2 (7,8)
23. BBB5 (1,2,3, 6,7)
24. NLBeter2 (7,8)
25. Lijst Henk Krol3(2, 3, 5)
26. OPRECHT3 (6,7,8)
27. JEZUS LEEFT3 (4,5,8)
28. Trots op Nederland (TROTS)onduidelijk
29. U-Buntu Connected Front5(2,3,4,5,6)
30. Blanco lijst met als eerste kandidaat Zeven, A.J.L.B. (zie Hart voor Vrijheid)8 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
31. Partij van de Eenheidonduidelijk
32. DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)5 (1,2,3,4,5)
33. Vrij en Sociaal Nederland4 (1,2,3,5)
34. Wij zijn Nederlandonduidelijk
35. Modern Nederlandonduidelijk
36. De Groenen1 (8)
37. Partij voor de Republiekonduidelijk

Hier de partijen op volgorde van het aantal “ja’s”

Schema 3
Hier de partijen op volgorde van het aantal “ja’s”Aantal ja’s op de eerste 8 vragen per partij, (en op welke vragen is het “ja”?)
130. Blanco lijst met als eerste kandidaat Zeven, A.J.L.B. (zie Hart voor Vrijheid)8 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
219. Piratenpartij8 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
332. DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)5 (1,2,3,4,5)
423. BBB5 (1,2,3, 6,7)
529. U-Buntu Connected Front5 (2,3,4,5,6)
626. OPRECHT5 (2,3,6,7,8)
733. Vrij en Sociaal Nederland4 (1,2,3,5)
813. Forum voor Democratie4(2,3,6,7)
921. JONG4 (2,3,5,8)
1014. BIJ14 (3,4,5,8)
1120. LP (Libertaire Partij)4 (4, 6,7,8)
1212. DENK3 (2,3, 4)
1325. Lijst Henk Krol3(2, 3, 5)
1411. Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)3 (1,2,4)
158. ChristenUnie3 (1,3,5)
167. Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)3 (1,5,8)
1715. JA213 (1,7,8)
1827. JEZUS LEEFT3 (4,5,8)
1917. Volt3 (6,7,8)
209. Partij voor de Dieren3 (6,7,8)
2110. 50PLUS2 (3,5)
2216. CODE ORANJE2 (7,8)
2322. Splinter2 (7,8)
2424. NLBeter2 (7,8)
254. D661 (1)
265. GROENLINKS1 (1)
276. SP (Socialistische Partij)1 (1)
282. PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)1 (2)
2936. De Groenen1 (8)
301. VVD, 3. CDA,0
31-3718. NIDA 28. Trots op Nederland (TROTS), 31. Partij van de Eenheid 35. Modern Nederland 37. Partij voor de Republiek 34. Wij zijn Nederlandonduidelijk

Hier de spreadsheet. Help je mee hem in te vullen? Zet je aanvullingen en verbeteringen hier in de commentaren! Alvast bedankt!

Hier nog een keer de link naar de volledige spreadsheets:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L8KMYQj5xiJGWWT5vSk18aaU-z-4X-IOJftdQbJdRQ4/edit?usp=sharing

Hier de kiesdistricten waar je op lijst 30 kan stemmen

Staat lijst 30 bij jou niet op de kieslijst, zoals het geval is in deze regio’s:

Dan kun je tot 12 maart online een kiezerspas aanvragen door te googlen op de naam van jouw gemeente en kiezerspas aanvragen.

Kun je zelf niet stemmen kan je op 2 manieren mensen machtigen om dat voor je te doen:

Een machtigings formulier halen kan via onderstaande code:

Keus gemaakt?

Geef het hier door!

Terug naar boven

Terug naar Index

Standard
Fundemental Human Rights, Peacemakers, Yeshua's Teaching

Why we should still honor Martin Luther King

Every year on Martin Luther King‘s birthday I pick a favorite quote of his to make a post to his tribute, and immerse myself in his sermons, which I collect here. And I get a lot out of it, new insights, a renewal of faith, new fire for the peaceful struggle for human rights.

And then the question arises: can someone as inspired as he, someone as passionate about peace and justice, have been an abusive adulterer?

Or is it an evil set up? Deepfakes are easier and easier to make. And they had a motive. F.B.I. director from 1924-1972 Herbert Hoover called him the most dangerous man in the United States.

Even today deepfakes of him are being made. Like this one, where the background is obviously a screen. It even moves around, what a joke. And he has white hands. He talks more like Trump than like Martin Luther King. People who are so devoid of morals that they would make deepfakes of Martin Luther King also lack his eloquence. And the eyes are shifty, like those of a criminal. Martin Luther King always had the calm and shining eyes that go with someone with a clear conscience. If Martin Luther King spoke about disillusionment, this is how he did it.

I spotted another deepfake. This one. Just audio, supposedly from 1968. The suspicion rises when it is out of character for Martin Luther King. Then you notice little things, like his saying “uh” all the time. Very untypical of Martin Luther King. Then you notice he mispronounces words, something Martin Luther King never does. Thus he pronounces u’s at the ends of words as a’s. Continua, instead of continue. Another sign of a deepfake is the weird cheering between passages. And the literal repetitions of phrases in other speeches and sermons. Martin Luther King would revisit similar themes often, but there would always be slight variations in the wording. This speech sounds stale. And it is just audio. They were not as adept in deepfaking video in the 60’s. but audio was doable. And there is another sign of a deepfake. Martin Luther King would not make a speech to people who greet him from out of jail, he would simply talk to them. What he did always fitted the occasion, This makes no sense.

And why would they deepfake this specific speech? Because in the real speech where Martin Luther King states his objections against the Vietnam war, he gives legitimate reasons for doing so, namely because the Vietnamese people had acquired their own independence through quoting the American declaration of independence, while the United States were backing an admirer of Adolph Hitler!

Here are more audio deepfakes with the same signs that are uncharacteristic of Martin Luther King. They carry suspicious titles as the Lost speech of Martin Luther King or the long lost speech of Martin Luther King. They have no specific date, time or place, just a year. This one supposedly took place in 1962. It has all the same signs of fakeness, the stuttering, the illogical cheers. You can listen to what Martin Luther King really sounded like in 1962 here.

More deep fake video’s: this one does not even have a year. You can tell it is deep fake by the verbiage, the fake hand, the fake screen behind it and the way of speaking that is very untypical of Martin Luther King.

This one also seems fake, the one where he receives his honorary degree from Stratford November 13 1967. It does have a date and a place, but the angle is weird He mispronounces words, and he seems more honored with an honorary degree from a school than with the Nobel Prize. That does not make sense. Another give away is the chaotic nature of his speech. King was a scholar and knew how to group his subjects. Less experienced writers will not have this skill.

Some seem half way fake, like this one, the American Dream , from July 4 1965. Notice the difference in sound before and after 11:30. Before is fake I think, after is the real Martin Luther King, sincere, accurate, witty.

Secret services need to convince people to work with them to take their target down, and if they would have used Martin Luther King’s real speech where he criticized America’s part in the Vietnam war for that, no one would have wanted to cooperate. But by making a fake one, where Martin Luther King only speaks of objecting to the draft but does not mention his reasons to, they have something to smear his reputation without running the risk of exposing their own corruption. And they will be especially nervous now because of the documents on Martin Luther King’s death becoming public in 2027. That’s probably why deepfakes are popping up like mushrooms, so that they can hide the fact that an innocent, peace loving preacher was murdered by secret services. they would rather have people think he was a violent adulterer. But that strategy sure blew up in their face when the riots for racial equality became violent. Liars always end up punishing themselves harder than the truth ever would have.

So the entrance of deepfake video means that you need to approach video’s as you would do handwriting. Notice every detail, and understand that people are poems, not junkyards. What they do fits with how they speak, fits with how they think.

Even if they would find an illegitimate child of Martin Luther King’s, cloning humans has publicly been possible since 1998 but who says the technology was not there long before?

He just does not have the ways of a dishonest person. When you see corrupt people, something about them makes you uncomfortable, gives you a headache.The ugliness of their ways shines through in their faces and in their words and listening to them drains you. Martin Luther King gives the opposite vibe. He energizes and inspires you to be the best you can be!

Besides, he was all self restraint when it came to temptation. as can also be seen in the video below:

No, he was not an adulterer, I’m sure of that. Any allegations to that effect are just vicious lies in an attempt to kill his reputation after they killed his physical body.

Here are some more ways of telling that he was as sincere, pure and wholesome as he seemed.

Retired ATF Investigator and Human Lie Detector, Janine Driver cracks the detecting deception through the nonverbal hot spots of murderers. Janine Driver is the founder, president, and lead instructor for BLUEStreak Training, an elite certification program that offers award-winning advanced communications training.

She reveals the secrets of body language, which she calls Everybody Second Language, and acronym for Eye blocking, Shoulder Shrugging and Liplocking:

I would add to that , that these signs only show if someone is acting according to his or her morals. So a person who has high morals will become tense if he or she does not act accordingly. But someone with lax morals will be fine with acting immorally. So body language only is useful if you know what someones morals are, and you can tell if they are lying about that too.

Martin Luther King showed the highest of morals, and could go on about how special a 72 year old lady was.

Generally speaking adulterers don’t see anything special in women over 30. That’s why they need to keep having affairs. They are not interested in making the world a better place. they are just interested in where they can find their next prey.

And besides, how does anyone think a baptist preacher could keep such a thing a secret? If a baptist preacher would engage in such activities the church would know about it immediately. It would be shouted from the public and he would be sent away in shame. He would have confessed it himself. That’s how he was.

Or did Martin Luther King have us all fooled and really do the awful things he is accused of?

In that case, what could have been the cause? Was he himself perhaps a victim of “the drum major instinct” he preached about at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia on February 4, 1968? You can listen to it here:

Or, if it really happened, was there something else to blame?

Paulinism is not a great help at all to resist temptation, with texts as

Romans 8:28

28And we know that God works all things together for the good of those who love Him, who are called according to His purpose. 

(BSB)

So what is a tempted person to do?

He or she will not have any help from Paul. In fact, Paul even makes trying to do good a sin!

See Galatians 5:4

4You who are trying to be justified by the law have been severed from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.

(BSB)

And Galations 3:10

10All who rely on works of the law are under a curse. For it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.”c 11Now it is clear that no one is justified before God by the law, because, “The righteous will live by faith.”d 12The law, however, is not based on faith; on the contrary, “The man who does these things will live by them.”e

13Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us. For it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.”f 14He redeemed us in order that the blessing promised to Abrahamg would come to the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit.

(BSB)

Quite opposite to Paul, Yeshua says we are all made by Our Heavenly Father (John 1:3), but we are only His children if we do His will (Matthew 12:49-50) and that His will is summarized by in all things doing for others what we would wish they would do for us, ( Matthew 7:12) that this is the law and the prophets ( Matthew 7:12), the validity of which is eternal, (Matthew 5:17-18)

Galatians 5:4 and Galations 3:10 are only two of the many places where Paul says that we are saved by believing Christ died for our sins, and that it is sinful to do good works.

Through Yeshua’s Teaching and The Holy Spirit, Our Heavenly Father made salvation attainable to all of us. Paulinism is the complete sabotage of Yeshua’s Teaching, since it makes doing as Yeshua says into a sin!

These salvation charts are a quick illustration of how incompatible Yeshua’s Teaching and Paulinism are:

Here is the salvation chart according to Yeshua’s Teaching:

And here is the salvation chart according to Paul:

(From Intelligent Devotion Chapter I.2.iv c. 1 Salvation charts according to Yeshua’s Teaching and according to Paulinism)

Aside from the fact that it may all be a set up, based on what do people want to condemn Martin Luther King?

Based on Paul, where doing good is said to be of no use for our salvation, and all things work together for good?

Or based on Yeshua, who says we should forgive all sins if we want to be forgiven ourselves? (Matthew 6:15)

According to the law someone is innocent until proven guilty, so even by that standard it would be wrong to assume Martin Luther King did anything wrong

Even if the allegations can somehow be proven to be true, don’t let the fact that Martin Luther King was unable to obey Yeshua perfectly be used as a way to discredit him. Let the fact that even someone as totally devoted to doing the will of Our Heavenly Father as Martin Luther King stumbled, be absolute proof of how detrimental to faith Paulinism is, and let people see that Paulinism and Yeshua’s Teaching are incompatible.

No one is able to follow Yeshua completely if he or she still believes in Paul. Not even Martin Luther King!

In fact, if everyone would really start doing as Yeshua said, all scapegoating would be a thing of the past, everyone’s fundamental human rights would be respected and Martin Luther King’s Dream would become a reality!

How perfect would that be?

Personally, I think Martin Luther King also knew about the difference between Yeshua and Paul. He always cited Yeshua’s powerful passages, never Paul’s wishy-washy ones. That’s another reason I don’t believe he did any of the nasty things he is accused of, and was every bit as pure and sincere as he seemed!

But there is another reason why we should still honor Martin Luther King. We need to relearn his philosophy of fundamental human rights and his means of non- violent protest. The world is falling apart because his lessons are forgotten.

So do as I do every year and immerse yourself in his quotes, speeches and sermons, unhindered by the cowardly and vicious lies about him, and see and hear how much of what he said is still relevant today:

Image may contain: 1 person, text that says '"Through our scientific genius we made of the world a neighborhood, but we failed through moral commitment to make ofita brotherhood, and so we've ended up with guided missiles and misguided men." MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.'

One more reason why we still need to honor Martin Luther King. The fifth of the ten commandments teaches us to honor our father and our mother, so we will prosper and have a long life. Martin Luther King is an important part of our heritage. The free world is falling apart because we are failing to honor the founders of democracy and human rights. Stop falling for the lies that smear his reputation, and start honoring those who gave their lives in the fight for the freedoms we hold for granted! Our very existence depends upon it!

And with honor, I do not mean idolize. Martin Luther King had his faults too. Personally I wonder what would have happened if he had followed Yeshua’s method perfectly. That means going the extra mile instead of just peacefil non cooperation. What if instead of protesting against not having equal rights on buses, they would have just continued carpooling, and set up their own public transportation where everyone was welcome? Then maybe the new would have just replaced the old, and the old would have become obsolete.

I wonder, if he had just been satisfied with the voting rights, and then used his energy to set up his own educational system, what would have happened then?

Proverbs 23:6 warns against eating the bread of a stingy man, and in Mark 6:11 Yeshua tells His disciples to leave the house where they are not welcome, even wipe the dust off their feet as a warning.

Tulsa ended tragically, but showed that when oppressed people work together they can make a better world, where the oppressors will want to participate in, and the tables can be turned. A new Tulsa, without segregation, with protection against corruption and terrorism.

So yes, protests until the rules that sabotage a fair, free and healthy life are changed. And from then on start building the life you want, with Micah 4:4 as an ideal:

4Everyone will sit under their own vine

and under their own fig tree,

and no one will make them afraid,

(NIV)

Let’s build a world like that together, while standing on the shoulders of giants like Martin Luther King!

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Peacemakers

Happy New Year!

Wishing you a

Scapegoating free,

deception free,

blame shifting free,

cruelty free,

lockdown free,

vaccine free,

toxin free,

pollution free,

fundamental human rights-,

environment- and nature respecting,

happy, healthy, blessed, fair, fruitful, fun New Year

full of kindness, love, magic, beauty, wonder and all that makes life worth living with all those and all that you love

and the wisdom and courage to search and step fully into

what you know in your heart to be true!

Articles on Covid 19

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Fundemental Human Rights

End times?

In Revelation 13:15-18, a period is described that looks earily like ours:

 15The second beast was permitted to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship it to be killed.

The Mark of the Beast

16And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, 17so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark—the name of the beast or the number of its name.

18Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666.d

https://biblehub.com/bsb/revelation/13.htm

And then they changed our genome

See also:

https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2020/11/18/the-truth-about-the-corona-vaccines/

Some just receive an injection with some salt water. https://scentses4d.wordpress.com/2019/11/09/hillary-clintons-foundation-arranged-for-chinese-vaccine-makers-to-avoid-u-s-scrutiny-world-health-organization-report-reveals/

And for the media world leaders receive fake vaccines altogether https://www.facebook.com/ilse.neeskens/videos/3836536129737655

Or they themselves are fake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSi3o01hcvU

All for a disease that could have been prevented and healed with some seeds

And so it is happening what the Bible said all along:, in Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:”

It is even right about 666 being the mark of the beast: first the lies about the need for this essential fatty acid which was the real cause of Covid, then the bad advice about how to attain it, and then the vaccine. https://scentses4d.wordpress.com/2020/11/11/omega-3-omega-6-and-omega-9-the-balancing-act/

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.” Yeshua said in Revelation 22:13.

Even in that was a message how to heal. Alpha Linolenic acid, or Omega 3, and Linoleic acid, or Omega 6.

Is that really too hard to understand? I don’t think it is.

https://intelligentdevotion.wordpress.com/what-is-intelligent-devotion/

Yeshua said in Matthew 24:34 He would come back in this generation. https://biblehub.com/matthew/24-34.htm

I had a dream 20200210. In my dream Yeshua came back with a candle stick and a circle of candles.

I will tell you the whole dream.

I was listening to Charlotte Church with my mother, and was better at reaching the high notes than she. Mam set the table for three with eggwarmers.I was with Wim and our son in an apartment with a big window, some sort of vacation address.

A little boy drew my attention to a big archway that was not there before.

It looked something like this

Designer Home Decor by Oscar de la RentaPhoto by Oscar de la Renta of his gardens in Kent, Connecticut. Order The Style, Inspiration, and Life of Oscar de la Renta on oscardelarenta.com

Then I saw the clouds were all square with a little square in the middle.

Something like this

And then I saw Yeshua come down from heaven with candles in His hand.

The candles were in a circle, on golden chandelier, something like this:

The colors were amazing, like a painting. . I started praying, but then remembered I had promised to take pictures, and I realized I should have been looking. I got dressed, put on gold pants. This was it. This was not a dream, it was real. I could not find the right shoes.

Then Yeshua came towards our house and wanted to meet me because I was so pious. Outside we saw mountains and unicorns.

A funny little animal, something between a dog and a pig came in,

Normally we would be scared of it, but now he was sweet because there was no more evil.I was sure it was real, that this was not a dream.

When I woke up there was an angel in the middle of the room, something white was present.

In waking state I looked up clues to see if there were clues foor the date. Golden pants : Wednesday. Unicorn is the symbol for Scotland, and November 30th is the Scottish national day. This year it is on Monday, but there is a lunar eclipse. It is cyber Monday. November 30 2022 is a Wednesaday.

Be ready always. Yeshua will be there just like that.

This generation is about to end when humans become genetically modified, so it would make sense to me if He would come back soon!

Yeshua says the tribulation would last for 3 and a half years.

But in Matthew 24:22 Yeshua says the time will be cut short.

Steve from Torah family explains that it will be shortened from the beginning, not the end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTNo4H2W1ik

It says there will be only one year of tribulation

Here even says a half a year:

Yeshua told us to watch the signs.

Let’s list them:

-storms

-hurricanes

-wars

–fires

-famines

plagues

-mass extinctions

-mass migrations

-the shifting of the earth’s axis

-the abomonation that maketh desolate in the holy place

-the alignment of Jupiter, Saturn and the sun

Now about the timing:

the inauguration of the Temple, With my dream I received the text Kings 5:1-5. That is very like Hanukkah,

That’s why Yeshua had a circle of candles, I think 12, that would be December 22, 2 days before Christmas, when the conjuction is.

-Bill Gates plans on blocking the sun, like it says that the sun will be blackened.

-Yeshua said he would come when all the world welcomes Him: as with Christmas

-Yeshua said every eye would see Him when He returns: now that is possible with the computer

-The talking beast made in man’s image: the computer

-This pope prophesied to be the last pope

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1370760/pope-francis-retire-iraq-trip-doomsday-prophecy-saint-malachy-vatican-church-spt

More texts on the rapture or the return of Yeshua December 21 2020

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1368156/end-of-the-world-2020-bible-december-21-doomsday-mayan-calendar-jesus-christ-return-evg

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1264789/End-of-the-world-when-will-Rapture-happen-Bible-Book-of-Revelation

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1370760/pope-francis-retire-iraq-trip-doomsday-prophecy-saint-malachy-vatican-church-spt

Some think the Covid pandemic is designed to keep us in lockdown forever, with perpetual vaccines against ever mutating viruses, as a scheme for the globalists to keep the masses in perpetual submission and slavery:

Covid “Mutation” Stories Show That The Lockdowns Are Designed To Last Forever

This is horrific too

Is God’s Judgment About to Fall on America? What is the “Mark of the Beast”?

To those of us who already feel there is something very dark going in behind the scenes, these stories help us understand where those feelings come from, whereas for others who are less sensitive, stories such as these are a source of discomfort. That’s what brings the cleft between the children of Our Heavenly Father and those who are not His children. His children live by the truth and need it to understand themselves. The truth brings them peace. Whereas those who live by lies are unsettled by the truth and will find those who bring the truth unpleasant to be around and they will do what they can to remove them from their lives. This is important to know when trying to understand why people to whom you are only kind hate you. They hated Yeshua first. they hate love itself, they hate truth. And so they hate you. It’s not personal. it’s actually an honor to be disturbing to untruthful people. They had the same problem with Yeshua, and if you have the same problems with dishonest people Yeshua had, you are doing fine.

It is curious that Trump is brought forward as being anti vaccine. In this appearance on the Rose Garden he is clearly very pro vaccine.

It is also curious that evangelical groups are so enamored with Trump. His manners are a lot less Christ like than Joe Biden’s.

If they are worried about voter fraud, why not begin at the beginning,, and be concerned about Gerrymandering and how the democrats were sabotaged from voting by closing down voting locations in democratic area’s and sabotaging the mail?

This is also interesting:This article mentions Trump as an anti Christ who will team up with the East and cause a 27 year war.

Could American Evangelicals Spot the Antichrist? Here Are the Biblical Predictions:

Some evangelicals are changing their minds about Trump after the raid on the White house https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/01/10/after-donald-trump-evangelical-christians-face-reckoning-column/6601393002/

But then the democrats are not squeaky clean either, If this is accurate, it is bad. Hear how a democrat poll worker instructs people how to keep the republicans at a distance:

https://rumble.com/vaxwob-detroit-leaks-video-was-taken-down-from-screwtube.html

Here more about the raid on the White house January 6, 2021

Chaos in Washington as Trump supporters storm Capitol and force lockdown of Congress – BBC News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXR_bqyAy4E

Inside the US Capitol as Trump supporters storm building – ITV News eyewitness report | ITV News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBp42536IhE&has_verified=1&bpctr=1610039381

Live updates

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/election-us-2020-55558355

Capitol riots: Has the US legislature been attacked before?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55572825

Heather Cox Richardson . History Chat In which we examine the raid…

https://www.facebook.com/heathercoxrichardson/videos/152601416417813 PODCAST: Bill Moyers and Heather Cox Richardson The Day the Confederate Flag Flew in the United States Capitol. https://billmoyers.com/story/podcast-bill-moyers-and-heather-cox-richardson/

Heather Cox Richardson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Cox_Richardson

Trump’s reaction to the rade.

https://www.facebook.com/thijs.henkel/videos/10224745850695923/

BBC News Jan 8, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6Ib927InXY

Arnold Schwarzenegger on the White house raid:

https://fb.watch/2Yn1Q9oO-o/

November 27 2020

Iran’s top nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh assassinated near Tehran

Iran’s top nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh assassinated near Tehran

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-55105934

How can you be sure you are not being deceived by controlled opposition?

Vladimir Lenin quote: The best way to control the opposition is to lead...

How do people make you feel?

What are they actually saying? Is what those who oppose vaccines actually more than what you can read on the vaccine insert? Are they giving alternative ways to keep your children healthy? Or are they pretending as though not vaccinating is in fact more dangerous than vaccinating? Are they pretending as though death is something you should accept? Them they are most likely controlled opposition, because they do not know that vaccinating is a careless way to treat life, and not vaccinating is prudent, so why should they be against it?

They will also be quick to ask for your personal contact information and more interested in that than in your opinion.

They will ignore other freedom fighters.

They will make fusses and fights and be very ego driven.

This can be helpful to spot the phonies

But then too, be aware that someone’s body language only tells you in how far they believe in what they are doing. You only know how to read them if you have heard what their morals are.

Someone with lax morals can lie like and cheat and have the calmness of a saint, because there is no conscience inside to accuse him.

In that context, check out the video’s on Tiffany Pontes Dover, the nurse who passed out 17 minutes after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.

Here yoi see her get the vaccine

https://newtube.app/user/Darek/Kg1FTmC?fbclid=IwAR3_HC0hnqhjwJIPHksUbHZKoJm5F2HboDTHAeKZpFGZA62T-Jf_gVxO6TQ


Joe Leonard @maelfynIt looks like rumors of Tiffany Dover’s death are TRUE and it is being covered up. No activity since her highly publicized public vaccination despite regular use of Instagram. No replies to dozens of questions. Family set their profiles to private. RIP https://instagram.com/tiffany_dover_

https://www.instagram.com/tiffany_dover_/

But what really is the most suspicious of all is how the fact checking is done

The news network sends someone to the hospital to fact check if Tiffany Dover is still alove, and even she does not speak with her.

https://www.wrcbtv.com/story/43111315/fact-check-chi-memorial-nurse-who-fainted-after-getting-covid19-vaccine-is-doing-fine

So what are we looking at here? Either she is really dead, and the hospital and the news networks are purposely doing a poor job of covering it up so people catch on. They are in fact slaves to the pharma giants, and they either openly rebel, and they can kiss their professional life, and often also their physical life good bye. Or they can quietly rebel, like this, hoping people catch on they can clear their conscience telling themselves they did what was in their power to warn us.

Further reading: Tiffany Dover

More end time signs:

Remember Isaiah 11:6-9?

6The wolf will live with the lamb,

and the leopard will lie down with the goat;

the calf and young lion and fatling will be together,a

and a little child will lead them.

7The cow will graze with the bear,

their young will lie down together,

and the lion will eat straw like the ox.

8The infant will play by the cobra’s den,

and the toddler will reach into the viper’s nest.

9They will neither harm nor destroy

on all My holy mountain,

for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD

as the sea is full of water.

(BSB)

Watch this:

So don’t be deceived. Whether Yeshua is coming back soon or not, do what is in your power to build paradise on earth, as described in Micah 4:4

    4Each of them will sit under his vine
            And under his fig tree,
            With no one to make them afraid,
            For the mouth of the LORD of hosts has spoken.

(NASB)

What reason is there not to start working on that now? Beginning with your own environment and any thing you touch.

You can either actively do what you can to build paradise on earth, or you can feel depressed for not trying.

Yeshua does not say we need to be finished with doing our part before He comes, but He sure needs to see us working on building paradise on earth, light on our feet, following the Holy Spirit, as described in New Bags for New Wine:

“Living with The Holy Spirit is like a dance. He is a wonderful leader, but you need to be light on your feet to live elegantly with His expert guidance. Yeshua gives many instructions how to do this. The Holy Spirit helps you remember Yeshua’s words, but in order to remember something, you need to study it first. The more you know, the easier it is for The Holy Spirit to guide you in His ways.

Yeshua often uses the imagery to dance and music to help us understand The Kingdom of Heaven:

Matthew 1116-19: “But to what shall I compare this generation? It is like children sitting in the market places, who call out to the other children, 17and say, ‘We played the flute for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge, and you did not mourn.’ 18“For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, ‘He has a demon!’ 19“The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Behold, a gluttonous man and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’ ” (NASV)

Also Matthew 22:11, where the King invites everyone for a wedding, but throws someone out for wearing the wrong clothes.

So we are expected to understand the worth of Our Heavenly Father’s invitation to The Kingdom of Heaven and live accordingly. We are invited to dance with the Holy Spirit, Not to be a dead weight in the Spirit’s arms, not to dance off beat or to a different tune, not to be too petrified and unable to move, not to go off with another than He. We should know what Yeshua wants from us and live accordingly. Have solid, not rigid plans. Be able to move elegantly with The Holy Spirit with every turn, pace and jump. You can only dance well with a partner you can trust 100%. Yeshua is committed to us and we to Him, and He is totally trustworthy. We should never settle for less. That would be an insult to Our Heavenly Father. Like choosing plastic over gems.”

https://intelligentdevotion.wordpress.com/2020/10/03/new-bags-for-new-wine/

And don’t be too worried how people react. Consider rejection and insults as signs youa re on the right path. The world hates Yeshua, and will hate you too if you live according to His will. But what use is acceptance acquired at the cost of inner peace?

If you are dealing with rejection even though you are doing exactly what Yeshua tells us to, here is a song that can help cheer you up:

Uprooted means your roots are up!

And don’t forget the CKIC method. as well as the Primaginca prayer protocol. You need to be the gate keeper of your soul. Acquire as much information from reliable sources as you can . but,you decide which information is worth accepting. And keep that feedback loop open. Is information debunked by experience, don’t deny your experience, improve your convictions!

Weigh your options and react intelligently, like I assume this hospital is doing, by going the extra mile. We were born to win and if you choose fairness, truth, love and health, you have a strong partners in Yeshua, His Father, the Holy Spirit and all the angels in Heaven!

See also

Articles on Covid19

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard
Peacemakers

The truth about the Corona vaccines

When you buy a household appliance, I assume that you do more than just look at commercials. Why take less trouble than that when it comes to something as important as your health?

Perhaps you don’t realize that you are listening to a commercial when you are reading the papers, listening to the radio or watching the news, but you are. The ones who own the media are the same ones who sell vaccines.

So I suggest you make at least as much of an effort for your health as you would for any purchase and do some research in what experts say who are not financially dependent upon vaccine sales before you decide what to do,

Many of them say Vaccines are unnecessary. There are natural ways to prevent and heal Covid19. Look here.

What do doctors themselves say about Covid vaccines?

What do the inserts say?

What are the adverse effects, why do they occur, and how serious are they?

What does the research say?

Read more about that here, and you will find out even the makers themselves are starting to admit how bad they are.

This is mostly just a chronological overview of the facts on corona vaccines as they emerge, so the intention is to update it regularly.

Corona vaccines are not safe. They make the disease worse, says Dr. James Lyons- Weiler:

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler at PA Medical Freedom Press Conference 10/20/20, Ofcourse it was removed from youtube, so here it is via bitchute.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/AyIApYO4W6gC/

The PA Coalition For Informed Consent PCIC Medical Freedom Press Conference 10/20/20 – opposing Covid vaccine mandates and medical care discrimination.

Research scientist James Lyons – Weiler, PhD, is President and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge , Founder of IPAK-EDU.org, and the author of “Cures vs. Profits“, “Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism“, and “Ebola:An Evolving Story”

Dr. Lyons-Weiler has been conducting biomedical research for over 20 years and has 58 peer-reviewed publications.

After earning a PhD in Ecology, Evolution & Conservation in Biology, he won an AP Sloan Postdoctoral Fellowship in Computational Molecular Biology at Pennsylvania State University.

Prior to founding IPAK and IPAK-EDU, he was a full faculty member at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, faculty in the Department of Pathology in the School and Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, and Senior Research Scientist/Scientific Director of the University of Pittsburgh’s Bioinformatics Analysis Core in support of translational research, systems biology, sequence analysis, and the creation of novel algorithmic solutions for the analysis of complex and challenging data.

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is outraged that animal trials are being skipped.

21 percent of people in the Moderna trials are having serious adverse effects.

Most people that were killed with Covid 19 were killed by the ventilators.

General antivirals also work against Corona.

If you are over 70 you have more chance of dying from flu than from Covid19.

The substances to fight corona virus sprayed in schools are known to reduce the reproductive capacity in mice by 50%.

Covid-19 vaccine trials cannot tell us if they will save lives

None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalisations, intensive care use, or deaths


21/10/2020

Feature: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials are not designed to tell us
Journal: The BMJ

So how do the Corona vaccines work?

According the makers:

This is how the WHO explains how the vaccines work.

What do critics say?

The immune system is trained to attack its own cells. What could possibly go wrong?

A diagram showing how the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works. A chimpanzee adenovirus is used in the ChAdOx1 viral vector, engineered to match the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

And if reading information from several sources is too much trouble, at least read the manual!

What is in the Covid Vaccines?

From https://www.bitchute.com/video/I89CJqq9vQkM/

This information from the package:

Just the quality you would expect based on the rest of the information on Covid 19.

Insert Pfizer vaccine:

Here is the Pfizer insert:https://tinyurl.com/y645dsdj?

See also Factsheets Covid vaccines further down this document.

Whar doctors say

Doctors issue chilling warning over ‘rushed’ coronavirus vaccine they say could have harmful side-effects – and reveal why government SHOULDN’T punish people who refuse the jab

  • Doctors warn coronavirus vaccine testing is rushed and can’t guarantee safety
  • Vaccines normally take up to 15 years to approve, the average is 10 years
  • Pharmaceutical giants race to be the first with a covid vaccine in under 2 years 
  • Australians could face being banned from work or travelling for refusing jab
  • Doctors warn the government not to make the ‘rushed’ vaccine compulsory 
  • More than 100 vaccine candidates studied worldwide, at least 10 in clinical trials

By ALISON BEVEGE FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA

PUBLISHED: 13:25 BST, 23 August 2020 | UPDATED: 08:13 BST, 24 August 2020

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655523/Doctors-issue-warning-rushed-coronavirus-vaccine-dangerous-effects.html

DR. Larry Palevsky’s Testimony in opposition of H.B.5044 in CT Public Health Committee Public Hearing (Full video). This video, is the same as the previous, only the sound is inferior to the former, but it had more information in the description.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Enl5KFoSu5w

Dr Larry Palevsky, MD . Testimony Connecticut 2/19/2020

Dr. Larry Palevsky 2 more times because I expect it to be deleted soon.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pjNpsbFOtgXp/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pjNpsbFOtgXp/

The aluminum nano particles in vaccines enter and persist in the brain for years and decades causing neuro- developmental disabilities in adults like Alzheimers.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1365987940904669189

Dr. Larry Palevsky is a pediatrician who says all the things that you can also read here:

See also https://scentses4d.wordpress.com/2019/04/29/the-case-medical-doctors-and-phds-make-against-vaccines/

The Dutch minister of health says that he recognizes there are dangers to the nano particles in the Pfizer vaccine

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2020/11/16/kamerbrief-over-aankoop-covid-19-vaccins

It says here 97 % of women who participated in the GSK vaccine trials became infertile.

Dr Dolores Cahill predicts allergic reactions to a next Covid epidemic caused by the MRNA vaccine making SARS-CoV-2 particles in every cell of the body ( 20201203) See

So forget about the vaccines and heal naturally!

And here it is again in case it gets banned from Facebook

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/ask-the-experts-covid-19-vaccine-now-banned-on-youtube-and-facebook_qIsNohSIeSgfz2J.html

Here’s the list the FDA printed with the possible side effects of the Covid vaccines.

For more on the Covid vaccines on Notes and talks Dr Dolores Cahill, PhD

One point of relief: It will not be obligated in France.

You can read that here:

https://www.sortiraparis.com/news/in-paris/articles/234772-covid-vaccine-will-not-be-compulsory/lang/en

And see that here:

https://youtu.be/B9IRPqU20RI

This poor nurse from Nashville Tennessee got Bell’s Palsey (facial paralysis) after having the Corona vaccine and warns people not to take it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5qd01w_8xM

Sónia Azevedo. Image Source.

Death of pediatric assistant two days after receiving Covid vaccine puts Portuguese health authorities ‘on alert’

By Natasha Donn
Portugal Resident

Excerpts:

Health authorities in Portugal today are described as “on the alert” following the so far unexplained death of a 41-year-old pediatric operational assistant two days after she received her first dose of the Covid vaccine.

The woman was one of 538 health professionals at Porto’s IPO cancer hospital who received their first jabs of the BioNTech/ Pfizer vaccine last Wednesday.

In a statement to the press, the hospital has confirmed the woman:

“received the vaccine on December 30, no undesirable effect having been notified, neither at the moment of vaccination nor on the subsequent days. Clarification of cause of death will follow the habitual procedures for these circumstances”.

Says Correio da Manhã tabloid, there is no indication that the woman had “any illness or health complication”.

The woman has now been identified as mother-of-two Sónia Azevedo who had dined with her family the night of New Year’s Eve, and been in what appears to have been ‘perfect health’.

She left after the dinner to visit her boyfriend in Maia (where she was found dead in bed the next morning).

According to her grief-stricken and utterly bewildered father: “she never drank alcohol, didn’t eat anything special or out of the ordinary” and was a “well and happy” individual who had been so proud of having been among the first to be vaccinated, that she had actually shared a photograph of the fact over social media.

Sónia Azevedo’s daughter Vânia Figueiredo told Correio da Manhã: “We don’t know what happened. It all happened quickly and with no explanation. I didn’t notice anything different in my mother. She was fine. She just said that the area where she had been vaccinated hurt, but that’s normal…”

The dead woman’s father Abílio told the paper: “I want to know what caused my daughter’s death”.

This story was not discussed to any degree on last night’s television news.

Read the full article at the Portugal Resident.

Miami coroner reviewing doctor’s death 2 weeks after vaccine

By MIKE SCHNEIDERJanuary 8, 2021

A ‘healthy’ doctor died two weeks after getting a COVID-19 vaccine; CDC is investigating why

By ANDREW BORYGASOUTH FLORIDA SUN SENTINEL |JAN 07, 2021 AT 12:24 PM

Doctor Louise Lagendijk is a medical doctor with an extensive background in molecular genetics and obstetrics in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam and the Harvard Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering who explains how M-RNA vaccines cause auto immune diseases.

WARNING: 3,150 Injuries in First Week of COVID Vaccines Among American Healthcare Workers! Pregnant Women Included

Tiffany Dover

December 17th 2020: Tennessee Nurse Manager Passes Out on Camera After Receiving Pfizer COVID Vaccine. After that all her social media accounts went silent and her name appeared on death certificates. All her family members set their social media accounts on silent. Clearly phony messages have been appearing to convince people she is still alive, feeding suspicions that she has indeed passed away.

see also end times

There you also see how easy it is to fake getting a vaccine

Did she really get the vaccine?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9xvm7wHgpo

The vaccine that was used is a safety syringe.

https://www.nursing.nl/prikken-met-veilige-naalden-het-went-1432806w/

No photo description available.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y665WJrPgM

Let’s hope it won’t be obligated anywhere!

Ex Merck employee Brandy Vaughan warned against vaccines

She was foind dead by her 8 year old son December 7 2020.

See Corruption in Big Pharma

And is this Corona vaccine necessary? In Germany, actually less people died in 2020 than in earlier years.

https://principia-scientific.com/professor-dolores-cahill-people-will-start-dying-after-covid-vaccine/

See also

Corona-kroon

https://www.adhdfraude.net/pdf/

And see also

The case medical doctors and PhD’s make against vaccines

—————————————————————————————————————————————-

Doctor’s Death After Covid Vaccine Is Being Investigated

Dr. Gregory Michael, a 56-year-old obstetrician and gynecologist in Miami Beach, received the vaccine at Mount Sinai Medical Center on Dec. 18 and died 16 days later from a brain hemorrhage, his wife, Heidi Neckelmann, wrote in a Facebook post.

Shortly after receiving the vaccine, Dr. Michael developed an extremely serious form of a condition known as acute immune thrombocytopenia, which prevented his blood from clotting properly.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/health/covid-vaccine-death.html

These Are the COVID Vaccine Side Effects Doctors Are Worried About

SOME SIDE EFFECTS OF THE VACCINE CAN MIRROR A MILD COVID CASE.

Allie Hogan

By ALLIE HOGANNOVEMBER 24, 2020

Woman experiencing side effects from COVID vaccines
Shutterstock

While many people regard the COVID vaccines in the making as miracle salves that will allow us to return to life as we knew it pre-pandemic, doctors are warning that getting the vaccines may not be “a walk in the park.” According to CNBC, both Moderna and Pfizer, the companies responsible for the most promising vaccine trials, have acknowledged that their COVID vaccines could have side effects similar to symptoms of a mild COVID case. People who have participated in the trials have confirmed that there are some adverse effects following the vaccine. Keep reading to learn what doctors want people to know about the vaccine side effects, and to find out who will be first in line to get the shot, These 5 People Will Get the COVID Vaccine First, Dr. Fauci Says.

“We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park,” said Sandra Fryhofer, MD, of the American Medical Association, during a Nov. 23 meeting with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, as reported by CNBC. “They are going to know they had a vaccine. They are probably not going to feel wonderful.”

Both Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines require two doses. Fryhofer fears that people won’t return for their second dose of the vaccine due to unpleasant side effects, which would render the first round of vaccine useless. CNBC reports that during a meeting with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), doctors urged public health officials and drugmakers to be transparent about the potential side effects that may come with the coronavirus vaccine.

In September, some people who participated in vaccine trials told CNBC about the various side effects they were experiencing. The participants maintained that although the side effects were undesirable, they felt getting the vaccine was worth it.

Although the side effects sound scary, scientists knew they would accompany a vaccine. UC Davis virologist Sam Díaz-Muñoz, a participant in the Moderna study, knows from personal experience that side effects can be bad, but “it’s completely natural because [your body is] working overtime to make immune response,” he told ABC. He wants people to understand that the side effects are commonplace and to “be prepared and not freak out that we rushed into this.”

Read on for more on the side effects that have been linked to the vaccines, and to find out when you might be able to get vaccinated, If You’re This Age, You May Be Last to Get the COVID Vaccine, Fauci Says.

1Fever and body aches

man on couch checking his temperature for fever
Shutterstock

Luke Hutchison, who participated in a Moderna study over the summer, told Science Magazine on Nov. 18 that just a few hours after the shot, he experienced bone and muscle aches and an “unbearable” fever of over 102 degrees Fahrenheit. “I started shaking. I had cold and hot rushes,” he recalled. “I was sitting by the phone all night long thinking: ‘Should I call 911?'”

Hutchinson said the symptoms dissipated after 12 hours, but no one had prepared him for the intensity of the experience. And to make sure you’re ready, You Need to Quit This Bad Habit Before Getting a COVID Vaccine, Study Says.

2Nausea and vomiting

young asian woman with nausea covering her mouth
Shutterstock/Onjira Leibe

Ian Haydon, who received the highest dose during Moderna’s first human trial in May, experienced “headache, muscle ache, fatigue, nausea.” He also vomited and fainted in reaction to the vaccine and eventually admitted himself to urgent care. Haydon told Science Magazine that it was a “small price to pay” for the possibility to return to normal life.

“For me, this was a rough day. But if you compare it to what COVID can do, I think it really pales in comparison.” It’s also important to note that due to reactions like Haydon’s, Moderna reduced the dosage of the vaccine from 250 micrograms to 100 micrograms. And for more up-to-date information, sign up for our daily newsletter.

3Migraines

woman laying in bed with migraine
Shutterstock

CNBC reports that a middle-aged woman in North Carolina who participated in the Moderna study reported suffering from a migraine that clouded her focus and drained her energy. The woman said the symptoms were gone the next day but advocated that people take a day off following the shot. And for more on the experience of getting the COVID vaccine, This Is What Getting a COVID Vaccine Feels Like, Volunteers Say.

4Muscle pains and arm soreness

Man with arm discomfort
iStock

During the Nov. 23 meeting, Patsy Stinchfield, a nurse practitioner, said reactions to the vaccine are simply “immune responses,” CNBC reported. “And so if you feel something after vaccination, you should expect to feel that. When you do, it’s normal to have some arm soreness or fatigue,” Stinchfield noted. “It sounds like in some of these trials, maybe even having to stay home from work.”

Additionally, CNBC says both Moderna and Pfizer have acknowledged muscle pain as a side effect of the vaccine. And for a look at life after immunization, Dr. Fauci Says You Shouldn’t Go Here Until a Year After a Vaccine.

https://bestlifeonline.com/covid-vaccine-side-effects/

From the cdc website:

COVID 19 SYMPTOMS——-ADVERSE REACTIONS PFIZER
fever or chills———————-fever
cough——————————- fatigue
Shortness of breath———-—headache
muscle or body ache————chills
headache—————————vomiting
loss of taste————————diarrhea
sore throat—————————muscle pain
congestion or runny nose——-new or worsening joint pain
nausea or vomiting—————lymphadenopathy
diarrhea——————————Bell’s palsy
fatigue

Over 50% of the trial participants had adverse reactions. How were the adverse reactions determined not to be covid 19 symptoms? All of the more common adverse reactions are covid 19 symptoms. See how they could rig the experiment game. The efficacy experiments only trialled whether covid symptoms were reduced or not. I did not include adverse reactions at the injection site or serious adverse reactions.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/pfizer/reactogenicity.html

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/04/5-ways-theyre-trying-to-trick-you-into-taking-the-covid-vaccine/

A Second Public Letter of Warning to Pfizer’s Executive Leadership: The Danger of Indiscriminate COVID-19 Vaccination in The Recently Infected

By Hooman Noorchashm MD, PhD

Covid outbreak in care home after first vaccine.

https://www.rtvutrecht.nl/nieuws/2136787/coronauitbraak-in-verpleeghuis-amersfoort-bewoners-kregen-onlangs-eerste-vaccinatie.html?

Willem Engel is talking to activists in Israel, talking about the many deaths after the Pfizer vaccine and the human rights violations done to force people to vaccinate.

https://www.facebook.com/Viruswaarheid/videos/413795566354625

20210220 Update on nurse Kristi Simmonds who got the Mod C vaccin on Tuesday, January 19 – still no improvement after 1 month!

https://www.facebook.com/monique.dekker.54/videos/10158780843287900/

Many covid outbreaks occur right after being vaccinated:

May be an image of text

Mortality rates among the vaccinated in Israel are 40 times higher than among the unvaccinated

Pfizer vaccine killed around 40 times more elderly than the virus itself would have.

https://www.facebook.com/Viruswaarheid/videos/455785465766319

Reports of Deaths after Covid Vaccines up by 259 in 1 week CDC data show.

Between Dec. 14, 2020, and Mar. 5, 2021, 31,079 reports of adverse events were submitted to VAERS, including 1,524 deaths, 5,507 serious injuries and 390 reports of Bell’s Palsy.

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the number of injuries and deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccines remain consistent with previous weeks, with the exception of a 31% spike in reports of Bell’s Palsy.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received by the system as of Friday of the previous week. Today’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 5, a total of 31,079 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 1,524 deaths — an increase of 259 over the previous 7 days — and 5,507 serious injuries, up 1,083 over the same time period.In the U.S., 85.01 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of March 5.

From the 3/5/21 release of VAERS data.

VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

This week’s 31% increase in reports of Bell’s Palsy marks a break with past trends. Otherwise, today’s data reflect trends that have emerged since The Defender first began tracking VAERS reports related to COVID vaccines.

https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2021/03/13/reports-of-deaths-after-covid-vaccines-up-by-259-in-1-week-cdc-data-show/

 Elísabet Guðmundsdóttir,, plastic and reconstructive and pedriatric surgeon in Iceland , graduated Cum Laude, who has also worked in developing countries to help with cleft pallet surgery and to educate other doctors is Willem Engel’s guest. She has been severely harassed after critisizing the narrative on Covid. She talks about how masks are petri dishes for aspergillus spores which cause cancer. The clinical symptoms of Covid are exactly the same as fungal infections. Asperigillus flavus mpstly and Asperigullus niger in 30% She also says that endometrioses can be cured by anti fungals. People who have this fungal infection would also test positive for Covid. Virus is breakdown of the DNA of the fungus. Asperigillus produces micro toxins. Covid is a fungus in the mask and Vitamin D deficiency. Ivermectin is used against Covid in Africa, that’s why no one in Africa has Covid. We are the animals now, they have done no animal testing for Covid vaccines. It is not a vaccine, it is gene therapy. Every single amino acid in the protein in the vaccine is identical to that in the placenta. Women who start making antiboies are making antibodies against their own placenta and will never be able to have children. Every single amino acid in the spike protein is exactly like the synthesin protein, the main protein in the placenta. SUnthesin is the main protein in the placenta. If women start to make antibodues against this protein, they will never be able to have children again. Pollen and spores make aerosols. Fungi thrive on radiatipn. 1 to 10.000 aspirigillus spores inside a room. You need to shift the house at least 10 times a day. The spores don’t effect you, but a mask is a petri dish for the spores. People with lupus, all had fungus. Same goes with cancer, Breast cancer is vitamin D deficiency. One pill Ivermectin a week prevents Covid 100%, three novel ‘wonder drugs’ artemisinin, ivermectin and praziquantel, mainly used against malaria, lymphatic filariasis (LF)/river blindness and schistosomiasis, respectively. All three, discovered and developed in the 1970s (though extracts of the plant Artemisia – qinghaosu –  See also Artemisia, an effective anti-maleria herb We can cure every disease. Disease does not really exist. The reason the put fluoride in water is to compete with iodine. Fluoride competes with Iodine and makes us immune compromised. https://rocketreach.co/elisabet-gudmundsdottir-email_108090489

https://www.facebook.com/Viruswaarheid/videos/738931030158398/

Ireland halts use of AstraZeneca vaccine following blood clot reports in Norway

Nederland stopt tijdelijk met vaccineren met AstraZeneca

May be an image of text that says 'Toch nog even de indrukwekkende lijst op een rijtje: Denemarken stopt met Astra Zeneca Noorwegen stopt met Astra Zeneca ljsland stopt met Astra Zeneca Letland stopt met Astra Zeneca Litouwen stopt met Astra Zeneca Oostenrijk stopt met astra Zeneca Luxemburg stopt met Astra Zeneca Italie stopt met Astra Zeneca Thailand stopt met Astra Zeneca Zwitserland en Zuid Afrika hebben het nooit goedgekeurd.'
May be an image of text that says 'Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport >Retouradres enHaag De Staten-G Postbus 20018 DEN Tweede Kamer Datum Betreft www.rijksoverheid.nl Kenmerk 1843491-219643-PDC19 14 maart over pauzeren van de toediening van het AstraZeneca-vaccin Bijlage(n) Geachte voorzitter, Vanavond heeft College Beoordeling an Aanleiding gekomen COVID- Geneesmiddelen (CBG) van nieuwe informatie vaccin Het gaat trombosegevallen vaccinatie, geeft totaal nieuwe meldinger zijn binnengekomen uit maar Nederland Astrazeneca. maken hebben na dezem adviezen verband -19 zijn, Kamer daarvan po pauzerer ΕΜΑ. Zodra noogte stellen. adviezen minister van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn Sport, Hugo de Jonge Pagina'

May be an image of map and text that says 'Which Countries Have Stopped Using The AstraZeneca Vaccine? Countries that have stopped using or halted rollouts of the AstraZeneca vaccine* As of 10:00am CET on March 16, 2021. Estonia, Lithuania, and Luxembourg have suspended the use of doses from one batch. Source: News Reports statista'

JANUARY 29, 2020

𝙢𝙍𝙉𝘼 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙚𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙤𝙣 𝘿𝙉𝘼.by Eyrun Thune, University of Oslo.Following a new collaboration between the University of Oslo and research groups in Nottingham and Oxford, it has now been revealed that modified RNA has a direct effect on DNA stability, according to Professor Klungland’s research.

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-rna-effect-dna.html

The late Dr. Andrew Moulden produced a three part series in 2008 called Tolerance Lost. These videos explain the science of vaccine injury.

Dr Andrew Moulden was a neurologist saw that post vaccination, children had the equivalent of a stroke after the vaccine, losing language and showing signs of autism.

He explains how the immune response after vaccines blocks capillary blood vessels because white blood cells are bigger than red ones. Then red blood cells are blocked as well causing oxygen shortage and Ischemia.

He’s

He’s one of a long list of doctors who warn us against vaccines. Here are their arguments.

Pierre Capel, PhD, is an emeritus professor of experimental immunology

Here he explains why the Covid mrna vaccines are not only useless , they are also dangerous:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eV-BS1c8jQ

Normally pathogens are transported to the lymph nodes and antigens are made there in a very organised way.

With the mrna technique used for Covid vaccines however the organs and tissues virus mrna is brought into random cells and the tissues and organs start producing virus proteins causing inflammatory responses in the whole body.

This explains the long list of adverse effects.

The vaccine is not just useless, it is counter productive.

MICHAEL YEADON, EX VICE-PRESIDENT OF PFIZER, SAYS COVID IS FINISHED

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7LVcz8y8tc45/

Mike Yeadon(ex Pfizer CSO) discusses key aspects of the Covid-19 illness – its rise and fall, and also why the MSM information machine has it all wrong – including the UK’s SAGE reporting system. This is the sort of knowledge-based information the MSM will not allow you to see.. He says: stop mass testing. Covid was over a long time ago. Immunity is robust for at least 17 years. possibly for life.He explains the larger number pf deaths in certain countries to mild winters in previous years. causing a smaller number of deaths in the previous year, dry timber, so people are weaker and older and get infected and die sooner. 2020 does not have an excess of deaths. It’s about 8th since in 1993.

Dr Mike Yeadon argues that he doesn’t expect much bad stuff to happen from these first generation vaccines – he said the deaths are probably unintentional and due to mistakes. He thinks the problem would be with the booster shots they’re talking about. He said they could be programmed to have delayed effects which would give plausible deniability. Said there’s no benign reason they’d be rolled out as variants are about 0.02% different to the original. Also said look out for a crisis which the government would claim needs more vaccines to fix and don’t accede to it. Of course he says all this with no knowledge of Q or that ‘You’re watching a movie’ so he’s looking at the doomy side

The way to go forward:

  1. Stop mass testing. There is 1 percent false positives. The testing causes the pandemic, nothiong else.
  2. Fire everyone involved with this pandemic.

Willem Engel speaks to Mike Yeadon, April 5 2021

Former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon: COVID Vaccines Are Designed ‘To Kill You And Your Family’ With ‘Plausible Deniability

April 7, 2021

This “study” confirms exactly what Dr. Yeadon is claiming — that there will be perhaps a two year lapse between the time of the vaccination and when major fatal conditions — such as Prion Disease — start showing up in millions of those vaccinated, creating “plausible deniability” for the vaccines.

These vaccine side effects, of course, will be blamed on a “new variant” of COVID — for which the vaccine did not provide protection — creating an endless cycle of vaccination and disease until the desired depopulation targets are met.

And all of this has been made possible because people have been brainwashed — using medical melodramas — to unquestioningly trust their doctors — as their literal “saviors”.

And, of course, their “trusted” Christian pastors, priests, and clergy are in lockstep with the “expert” doctors — telling their congregations that taking the vaccine is their “Christian responsibility.”

Because this conspiracy is so vast and so evil, as Dr. Yeadon points out, most people will simply refuse to believe it — and former Director of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover once made the exact same observation in an article he wrote for The Elks Magazine in 1956:

“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”

https://christiansfortruth.com/former-pfizer-vp-dr-michael-yeadon-covid-vaccines-are-designed-to-kill-you-and-your-family-with-plausible-deniability/

Posted on: Thursday, May 6th 2021 at 6:15 amWritten By: Sayer Ji, FounderThis article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2021

Deadly Prion Brain Diseases & Experimental mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines: Study Finds Plausible Link

Scientists believe CWD proteins (prions) likely spread between animals through body fluids like feces, saliva, blood, or urine, either through direct contact or indirectly through environmental contamination of soil, food or water.

This is what the CDC says about Prion disease (CWD, Chronic Wasting Disease).

https://www.cdc.gov/prions/cwd/transmission.html

What is Prion disease?

Johns Hopkins says:

Prion diseases comprise several conditions. A prion is a type of protein that can trigger normal proteins in the brain to fold abnormally. Prion diseases can affect both humans and animals and are sometimes spread to humans by infected meat products. The most common form of prion disease that affects humans is Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

Prion diseases are rare. About 300 cases are reported each year in the U.S.

Types of prion diseases include:

  • CJD. A person can inherit this condition, in which case it’s called familial CJD. Sporadic CJD, on the other hand, develops suddenly without any known risk factors. Most cases of CJD are sporadic and tend to strike people around age 60. Acquired CJD is caused by exposure to infected tissue during a medical procedure, such as a cornea transplant. Symptoms of CJD (see below) quickly lead to severe disability and death. In most cases, death occurs within a year.
  • Variant CJD. This is an infectious type of the disease that is related to “mad cow disease.” Eating diseased meat may cause the disease in humans. The meat may cause normal human prion protein to develop abnormally. This type of the disease usually affects younger people.
  • Variably protease-sensitive prionopathy (VPSPr). This is also extremely rare, it is similar to CJD but the protein is less sensitive to digestion. It is more likely to strike people around age 70 who have a family history of dementia.
  • Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease (GSS). Extremely rare, but occurs at an earlier age, typically around age 40.
  • Kuru. This disease is seen in New Guinea. It’s caused by eating human brain tissue contaminated with infectious prions. Because of increased awareness about the disease and how it is transmitted, kuru is now rare.
  • Fatal insomnia (FI). Rare hereditary disorder causing difficulty sleeping. There is also a sporadic form of the disease that is not inherited.

What causes prion disease?

Prion diseases occur when normal prion protein, found on the surface of many cells, becomes abnormal and clump in the brain, causing brain damage. This abnormal accumulation of protein in the brain can cause memory impairment, personality changes, and difficulties with movement. Experts still don’t know a lot about prion diseases, but unfortunately, these disorders are generally fatal.

Who is at risk for prion diseases?

Risk factors for prion disease include:

  • Family history of prion disease
  • Eating meat infected by “mad cow disease”
  • Infection from receiving contaminated corneas or from contaminated medical equipment

What are the symptoms of prion diseases?

Symptoms of prion diseases include:

  • Rapidly developing dementia
  • Difficulty walking and changes in gait
  • Hallucinations
  • Muscle stiffness
  • Confusion
  • Fatigue
  • Difficulty speaking
PNerv_20140304_v0_002

How are prion diseases diagnosed?

Prion diseases are confirmed by taking a sample of brain tissue during a biopsy or after death. Healthcare providers, however, can do a number of tests before to help diagnose prion diseases such as CJD, or to rule out other diseases with similar symptoms. Prion diseases should be considered in all people with rapidly progressive dementia.

The tests include:

  • MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans of the brain
  • Samples of fluid from the spinal cord (spinal tap, also called lumbar puncture)
  • Electroencephalogram, which analyzes brain waves; this painless test requires placing electrodes on the scalp
  • Blood tests
  • Neurologic and visual exams to check for nerve damage and vision loss

How are prion diseases treated?

Prion diseases can’t be cured, but certain medicines may help slow their progress. Medical management focuses on keeping people with these diseases as safe and comfortable as possible, despite progressive and debilitating symptoms.

Can prion diseases be prevented?

Properly cleaning and sterilizing medical equipment may prevent the spread of the disease. If you have or may have CJD, do not donate organs or tissue, including corneal tissue.
Newer regulations that govern the handling and feeding of cows may help prevent the spread of prion diseases.

Living with prion diseases

As prion diseases progress, people with these diseases generally need help taking care of themselves. In some cases they may be able to stay in their homes, but they eventually may need to move to a care facility.

Key points about prion diseases

  • Prion diseases are very rare.
  • Symptoms can progress rapidly requiring help with daily needs.
  • Prion diseases are always fatal.

Next steps

Tips to help you get the most from a visit to your healthcare provider:

  • Know the reason for your visit and what you want to happen.
  • Before your visit, write down questions you want answered.
  • Bring someone with you to help you ask questions and remember what your provider tells you.
  • At the visit, write down the name of a new diagnosis, and any new medicines, treatments, or tests. Also write down any new instructions your provider gives you.
  • Know why a new medicine or treatment is prescribed, and how it will help you. Also know what the side effects are.
  • Ask if your condition can be treated in other ways.
  • Know why a test or procedure is recommended and what the results could mean.
  • Know what to expect if you do not take the medicine or have the test or procedure.
  • If you have a follow-up appointment, write down the date, time, and purpose for that visit.
  • Know how you can contact your provider if you have questions.

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/prion-diseases

While Johns says prion disease cannot be transmitted via blood, this is what yje CGC says about transmission of prion duseaseL

Transmission

Scientists believe CWD proteins (prions) likely spread between animals through body fluids like feces, saliva, blood, or urine, either through direct contact or indirectly through environmental contamination of soil, food or water. Once introduced into an area or farm, the CWD protein is contagious within deer and elk populations and can spread quickly. Experts believe CWD prions can remain in the environment for a long time, so other animals can contract CWD from the environment even after an infected deer or elk has died.

Image of deer

The CWD prion has been shown to experimentally infect squirrel monkeys, and also laboratory mice that carry some human genes. An additional study begun in 2009 by Canadian and German scientists, which has not yet been published in the scientific literature, is evaluating whether CWD can be transmitted to macaques—a type of monkey that is genetically closer to people than any other animal that has been infected with CWD previously.  On July 10, 2017, the scientists presented a summary of the study’s progress (access the recorded presentationExternalExternal and slides Cdc-pdf[PDF 3.88MB]External), in which they showed that CWD was transmitted to monkeys that were fed infected meat (muscle tissue) or brain tissue from CWD-infected deer and elk. Some of the meat came from asymptomatic deer that had CWD (i.e., deer that appeared healthy and had not begun to show signs of the illness yet). Meat from these asymptomatic deer was also able to infect the monkeys with CWD. CWD was also able to spread to macaques that had the infectious material placed directly into their brains.

This study showed different results than a previous study published in the Journal of VirologyExternal in 2018, which had not shown successful transmission of CWD to macaques. The reasons for the different experimental results are unknown. To date, there is no strong evidence for the occurrence of CWD in people, and it is not known if people can get infected with CWD prions. Nevertheless, these experimental studies raise the concern that CWD may pose a risk to people and suggest that it is important to prevent human exposures to CWD.

Additional studies are under way to identify if any prion diseases could be occurring at a higher rate in people who are at increased risk for contact with potentially CWD-infected deer or elk meat. Because of the long time it takes before any symptoms of disease appear, scientists expect the study to take many years before they will determine what the risk, if any, of CWD is to people.

https://www.cdc.gov/prions/cwd/transmission.html

Pub med says: In human beings the abnormal prion has been reported in the brain, tonsils, spleen, lymph node, retina, and proximal optic nerve. Infectivity, although present in peripheral tissues, is at lower levels than in the central nervous system (CNS).

Mice with some human dna, where have I heard that before?

Humanising the mouse genome piece by piece

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09716-7

According to this FEMA nurse, Celeste Solum, the Covid 19 vaccinations (they are developing 48), will contain the following ingredients:

  1. Fetal tissues, fetal stem cells,
  2.  humanized mice, which are mice with human DNA, human blood, human organs, human immune system, in fact a human in a mouse suithuman proteins injected into a plants vascular systemhumanized plants, and they will say that this is to protect you from Covid 19,
  3. the third is humanized plants, transgenic plants is the official term for that.
  4. the fourth is a Darpa hydro gel sensor. It’s injected into you, and because of the particals it starts to assemble and grow, fuses to your system. It becomes one with you, and grows with you. In this way you become one with artificial intelligence. The excuse is that health officials will be alerted as soon as you are ill. Everything will be surveilled with this.

The PCR tests are for DNA harvesting she says. I think it’s for cloning and for procreation of the ones who are allowed to live, to keep the gene pool diverse.

7 million drones were flown over the US in 2020..

More interviews with Fema nurse Celeste Solum. the notes to which you can find here. Very outlandish, and I can imagine that this is what the governing people are aiming for, but I have no reason to Bellevue they are already there.

The Role Transgenic Mice Play In The Race For A Covid Vaccine

Researchers at Texas Tech have been testing their vaccine on the genetically-modified mice. The small mammals have so far provided good responses to antibody testing.
https://atx.audio/3i5P3JF

By Kaysie EllingsonAugust 4, 2020 10:01 amCoronavirusHealth & SciencePartner OrganizationsTexas Tech Public Media

A transgenic mouse at the Jackson Laboratory.

From KTTZ:

Hundreds of COVID-19 vaccines are in development across the world, including at Texas Tech University. After what researchers there consider a promising start, they are moving on to testing it on animals. And for this they need small mammals. For this particular research, they need “transgenic” mice.

Dr. Harvinder Gill leads the team. He’s an associate professor of chemical engineering at Texas Tech.

“We’ve found there’s actually a really good antibody response in mice,” he said, regarding results of their first round of testing.

Gill’s team of four has been working on a vaccine since March, when the first coronavirus cases popped up in Lubbock. They already had a grant from the National Institutes of Health to develop a flu vaccine, that would protect people for life with just one round of doses.

“We also have investigated if we can use the same technology for making a COVID-19 vaccine using a similar concept,” he said.

They’ve been able to see how the antibodies that their vaccine produces in a mouse’s blood interact with the coronavirus proteins. As the research moves to the next level, Gill has to use another lab, because his lab is only approved for work with regular mice – Texas Tech is a biosafety Level 2 facility. To use living animals, infected with the coronavirus, they would need a biosafety level 3 facility.

Regular mice lack a protein found in humans called the human ACE 2 protein. It acts like a doorway into the body for the coronavirus. That’s why genetically modified mice, also known as “transgenic mice” are so important.

“You take any sequence that you want, you could take a human sequence, you could take a fluorescent protein, you could take a plant protein, you could take any gene that you want and you essentially insert it into the mouse genome,” said Dr. Cat Lutz. She is the senior director of the mouse repository at the Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine.

“It’s kind of like designing a house if you will,” she said.

Lutz is a neuroscientist who’s been working with mouse genetics since the early 1990s. Her lab mass produces and distributes these transgenic mice for vaccine research and development. A big part of her job is finding the best mouse models around the world. She’s found one that she thinks might help in finding a vaccine for the coronavirus.

“The model that we have, the K18 model that we have from Stan Perlman, actually is turning out to be sort of the ‘diamond in the rough’.” Dr. Stanley Perlman is a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Iowa Health Care.

Back in the early 2000s, he developed a mouse model for the SARS virus, but it didn’t go well.

“[When infected with the virus] the mice get an overwhelming brain infection and die pretty quickly,” he said. Despite the fact that his mice died when exposed to the virus, Perlman still saves vials of their sperm.

“With SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19, they’re a little more useful because the mice don’t get so much brain infection, they get more lung infection, so they’re nearer to the human disease.”

That means they can be more useful in developing a COVID vaccine. So, once the pandemic hit, Perlman shipped those vials of sperm to Lutz and her team.

Through in vitro fertilization, Lutz’s team produced tens of thousands of these mice for use in labs around the world who are working on a COVID vaccine. There are concerns about the large quantity of animals needed for testing, and whether alternatives can be used.

“A transgenic mouse isn’t checking any boxes, it’s checking one box, can we infect you,” Jeff Brown said.

Brown part of PETA’s regulatory testing department. He points to Moderna’s COVID vaccine as an example of a company that didn’t rely on animal testing before moving onto clinical trials.

“That vaccine entirely skipped over this process where vaccines usually go through this years-long period of development and safety testing in animals,” he said.

According to Nicole Kleinstreuer, there are alternatives to animal testing in the initial stages of vaccine development. She’s the acting director at the National Toxicology Program’s Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. A big part of their mission is to find alternatives to animal testing.

While science has made progress finding ways around animal testing, there are still limitations “in terms of the later stages of the process – vaccine safety testing,” Kleinstreuer said, “The short answer is no. There are no alternatives that are used or accepted for vaccine safety testing other than using animals or people.”

In the Moderna example, they were able to bypass testing of their vaccine on animals in the initial testing. But they did have to use the method later in the process. They’ve moved on to Stage III in the development process and will administer the vaccine to 30 thousand people across the country.

Perlman explains that researchers are not only interested in how a virus grows, they need to understand how it affects different tissues and immune responses. For that they need an immune system.

Back at the Texas Tech lab, Harvinder Gill and his team are discussing a method of delivering the vaccine through a patch. They’re testing the patch, while waiting for the green light to test their vaccine on animals. He’ll do that with a team at Utah State University. They have the facility needed to continue testing. Gill says it’ll take about 60 days to find out if his vaccine works.

https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/the-role-transgenic-mice-play-in-the-race-for-a-covid-vaccine/

Let’s look that up: wiki[edia says: “MRC-5 (Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts, originally developed from research deriving lung tissue of a 14 week old aborted Caucasian male fetus[1][2], the current manufacturing process uses cell factories to grow MRC-5 without the need for any fetal cells”[3].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRC-5

The footnote refers to

“Optimization of a MRC-5 Cell Culture Process for the Production of a Smallpox Vaccine.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449906/

It does not say anything about not using fetal lung tissue, or doing anything to avoid that.

MRC-5 is literally human lung tissue, as you can read here.

So saying you have MRC-5 without human lung tissue is like saying you have eggs without eggs.

Wikipedia does this a lot. Check their footnotes if you want to be sure your information is accurate.

Some of the vaccines currently used to prevent diseases such as rubella, measles, rabies, poliomyelitis, hepatitis A, chickenpox or smallpox are produced using tissues from human abortions.

The vaccines consist of dead or attenuated live viruses that are introduced into the patient’s body to activate the body’s defences against that virus without becoming ill. Thus, if the patient subsequently enters into contact with the live virus, it will be unable infect him, since he has the necessary defences to cope with it, i.e. he is immunised.

To prepare the vaccines, the viruses must be cultured in cells in the laboratory. The ethical difficulty appears when these cells come from surgically-aborted human foetuse. Similarly, the viruses themselves can be obtained from aborted foetuses that have been infected with a particular virus. An article published in 2008 in Cuadernos de Bioetica includes detailed information on the different cells and viral strains originating from these sources.

Cells used and vaccines produced using aborted fetuses

The most widely used foetal cells are WI-38 and MRC-5. The WI-38 cells were derived by Leonard Hayflick in 1962 from the lung of a 3-month female foetus [2].The initials WI refer to the Wistar Institute, a body of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and number 38 to the foetus from which the cells were obtained. The MRC-5 cells were obtained in 1966 from the lungs of a 14-week male foetus [3].The initials MRC indicate Medical Research Council, a body from London. Other cells derived from surgically-aborted foetuses are: WI-1, WI-3, WI-11, WI-16, WI-18, WI-19, WI-23, WI-24, WI-25, WI-26, WI-27, WI-44, MRC-9, IMR-90, and R-17 (obtained from lung); WI-2, WI-12 and WI-20, (skin and muscle); WI-5 (muscle); WI-8 and WI-14, and WS1 (skin); WI-4, WI-9, WI-10, WI-13 and WI-15 (kidney); WI-6, WI-21 and WI-22 (heart); WI-7 (thymus and thyroids), WI-17 (liver); FHs74Int (small intestine); and PER.C6 (retina)1https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/2017/01/is-it-true-that-there-are-vaccines-produced-using-aborted-fetuses/

This is what a 12 week old fetus looks like:

Baby at 12 weeks of pregnancy

At 12 weeks a fetus is about 5.4cm from head to bottom (crown to rump), the size of a lime, and weighs up to 14g .

This is what a 14 week old fetus looks like:

14 weeks pregnant: fetal development - BabyCentre UK

At 14 weeks the fetus is about 8.3 centimeters and weighs about 43 grams.

Latrogenic disease is the result of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures undertaken on a patient. With the multitude of drugs prescribed to a single patient adverse drug reactions are bound to occur. 

Gemelde overlijdens

Tot nu toe zijn er 189 meldingen van overlijden na coronavaccinatie. Het gaat om 157 ouderen van 80 jaar of ouder, 28 tussen de 65 en 79 jaar en 3 onder de 65 jaar. Van één is de precieze leeftijd niet bekend. Het merendeel had een kwetsbare gezondheid vanwege heel uiteenlopende ernstige onderliggende gezondheidsproblemen en/of hoge leeftijd. Het betrof 161 keer vaccinatie met Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech)(waarvan 34 keer de tweede), 14 keer vaccinatie met Moderna (waarvan 3 keer de tweede), 4 keer vaccinatie AstraZeneca en 10 keer was het vaccin onbekend.

Overlijden ná vaccinatie betekent niet dat een bijwerking van het vaccin de oorzaak is van het overlijden. In Nederland overlijden gemiddeld per dag zo’n 350 mensen van 65 jaar en ouder, waarvan zo’n 225 de leeftijd van 80 jaar en ouder hadden.

Het beeld van de klachten na de vaccinatie en/of de onderliggende gezondheidsproblemen is in deze meldingen heel divers en soms ook niet duidelijk. Bij een groot deel lijken andere oorzaken, veelal onderliggende gezondheidsproblemen, de meest voor de hand liggende verklaring van het overlijden. Op dit moment ziet Lareb in de meldingen geen patronen van klachten die wijzen op ernstige bijwerkingen waaraan gevaccineerden kunnen zijn overleden. Om hier nog beter inzicht in te krijgen heeft Lareb meer informatie opgevraagd over de meldingen bij de melders. Daarna worden de meldingen nogmaals nader bekeken en geduid in overleg met externe medische specialisten.

Sommigen kregen in de dagen na vaccinatie klachten die bekend zijn als bijwerkingen, zoals koorts, misselijkheid en algemeen niet lekker voelen. Deze klachten zijn op zichzelf niet de oorzaak van overlijden, maar kunnen bij enkele kwetsbare ouderen mogelijk wel bijgedragen hebben aan verslechtering van hun al fragiele gezondheidstoestand.

https://www.lareb.nl/pages/update-van-bijwerkingen

  • 10 deaths in a German palliative care patients within hours to four days of COVID-19 vaccination were deemed a “coincidence.”
  • 22 of 72 residents of a nursing home in Basingstoke, England have died following vaccination.
  • 24 seniors at a nursing home in Syracuse, NY were reported to have died from COVID-19 as of Jan. 9 despite having been vaccinated beginning Dec. 22.
  • 10 cases of COVID-19 were reported on Jan. 28 among seniors who had received both doses of Pfizer’s vaccine at one care home in Stockholm Sweden. The residents were vaccinated on Dec. 27 and again on Jan.19.
  • The COVID-19 death toll in the small British enclave of Gibraltar numbered 16 before it launched its Pfizer vaccination campaign on Jan. 10 and then shot up to 53 deaths 10 days later and to 70 seven days after that. According to a Reuters report, the Gibraltar Health Authority declared there was “no evidence at all of any causal link” between 6 of the deaths that were investigated and Pfizer’s vaccine, despite the individuals having tested negative for COVID before vaccination, but positive “in the days immediately after.”
  • 4,500 COVID-19 cases in Israel occurred in patients after they had received one dose of Pfizer’s vaccine and 375 of those vaccinated patients required hospitalization, Israeli news media reported on Jan.12.
  • Seven adults living in a care home in Saskatoon tested positive for coronavirus a week after residents were vaccinated at the Sherbrooke Community Centre, the CBC reported. There were no positive cases at the time of vaccination.
  • Seven residents at a Montreal long-term care facility tested positive for COVID- within 28 days of being vaccinated with Pfizer’s vaccine, prompting the province of Quebec to delay the second Pfizer dose.
  • Abercorn Care Home in Scotland, which began COVID-19 vaccinations on Dec. 14 was home to an outbreak of the virus by Jan. 10 and the National Health Service for the region refused to comment on whether vaccinated residents were ill. A care home staff group founder told the Scottish Daily Record: “We have had members of our group whose parents have had the vaccine and then two weeks later have tested positive for coronavirus.”
  • All of the residents at a home in Inverness, Scotland were vaccinated against COVID early in January, but 17 became infected with the virus after the first dose.
  • https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nursing-home-residents-spain-die-pfizer-covid-vaccine/

https://www.wnd.com/2021/04/facebook-corrects-womans-complaint-vaccine-killing-dies/

https://www.facebook.com/desiree.penrod.7

May be an image of text that says 'My Dad had a stroke less than 48 hours after his second Pfizer shot. No way I am getting the vaccine. 12:58 PM 23 Mar 21. Twitter for iPhone'

BREAKING: Dr. Fauci Admits COVID Vaccine May Not Be Safe

The Washington Gazette

The Editors-March 31, 2021

Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms

Pubmed

Published online 2016 Oct 31

This review collects studies on the toxic effects of GFNs in several organs and cell models. We also point out that various factors determine the toxicity of GFNs including the lateral size, surface structure, functionalization, charge, impurities, aggregations, and corona effect ect. In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, (toll-like receptors-) TLR-, transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways.

Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions

Science Magazine, December 21, 2020:

Now, to be clear, the nano particles in vaccines are not grafene, they are

     Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) According to the CDC

PEG is an ingredient in the mRNA vaccines, 

                    

PEG can also be found in your antiperspirants, fragrances, lipsticks,

                    makeup, and most baby shampoos.

                    It is used in cleansers to dissolve oil and grease, as well as to

                    thicken products. Because of its effectiveness, PEGs are often

                    used in caustic spray-on oven cleansers.

                    PEGs strip your skin of its Natural Moisturizing Factor (NMF).

                    What does this mean? It means that PEGs can destroy the

                    natural functioning of your skin which help keep it soft and

                    moist.

                    And what’s worse, products with Polyethylene Glycol are likely

                    to be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane, a carcinogen (cancer

                    causing chemical). Studies show that dioxane easily penetrates

                    into your skin.

                    So how would you know if a product has been contaminated

                    with dioxane? You won’t. Unless you have it tested. The wisest

                    thing to do would be to avoid all products with PEGs.

Dioxane has an LD50 of 5170 mg/kg in rats.  It is irritating to the eyes and respiratory tract. Exposure may cause damage to the central nervous system, liver and kidneys.

Dioxane is classified by the National Toxicology Program as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen“. It is also classified by the IARC as a Group 2B carcinogenpossibly carcinogenic to humans because it is a known carcinogen in other animals. The United States Environmental Protection Agency classifies dioxane as a probable human carcinogen (having observed an increased incidence of cancer in controlled animal studies, but not in epidemiological studies of workers using the compound), and a known irritant (with a no-observed-adverse-effects level of 400 milligrams per cubic meter) at concentrations significantly higher than those found in commercial products.Under California Proposition 65, dioxane is classified in the U.S. State of California to cause cancer.[Animal studies in rats suggest that the greatest health risk is associated with inhalation of vapors in the pure form. The State of New York has adopted a first-in-the-nation drinking water standard for 1,4-Dioxane and set the maximum contaminant level of 1 part per billion.

The CDC says:

If you are allergic to an ingredient in a COVID-19 vaccine

If you have had a severe allergic reaction or an immediate allergic reaction—even if it was not severe—to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, you should not get either of the currently available mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna).

If you have had a severe allergic reaction or an immediate allergic reaction to any ingredient in Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J/Janssen) COVID-19 vaccine, you should not get the J&J/Janssen vaccine.

If you aren’t able to get one type of COVID-19 vaccine because you are allergic to an ingredient in that vaccine, ask your doctor if you should get a different type of COVID-19 vaccine. Learn about the different types of COVID-19 vaccines.

If you had an allergic reaction to a previous shot of an mRNA vaccine

If you aren’t able to get the second shot of an mRNA vaccine because you had an allergic reaction to the first shot, Learn about the different types of COVID-19 vaccines.

If you are allergic to polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate

PEG and polysorbate are closely related to each other. PEG is an ingredient in the mRNA vaccines, and polysorbate is an ingredient in the J&J/Janssen vaccine.

If you are allergic to PEG, you should not get an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. 

If you are allergic to polysorbate, you should not get the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/specific-groups/allergies.html

Pfizer and Moderna have PEG in their vaccines.

Janssen has polysorbate in their vaccine.

Which Covid vaccines are there as of April 8th 2021

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines.html

Insert/ Factsheets Covid vaccines:

Fact sheet Pfizer vaccine:

WHO SHOULD NOT GET THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
You should not get the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine if you:
• had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose of this vaccine
• had a severe allergic reaction to any ingredient of this vaccine.
WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA,
lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2
[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-
phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium
phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.

WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
There is a remote chance that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine could cause a
severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few
minutes to one hour after getting a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. For
this reason, your vaccination provider may ask you to stay at the place where you
received your vaccine for monitoring after vaccination. Signs of a severe allergic
reaction can include:
• Difficulty breathing
• Swelling of your face and throat
• A fast heartbeat
• A bad rash all over your body
• Dizziness and weakness
Side effects that have been reported with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine
include:
• severe allergic reactions
• non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face
• injection site pain
• tiredness
• headache
• muscle pain
• chills
• joint pain
• fever
• injection site swelling
• injection site redness
• nausea
• feeling unwell
• swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy)
• diarrhea
• vomiting
• arm pain
4 Revised: 06 April 2021
These may not be all the possible side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19
Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19
Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.

Fact sheet Moderna vaccine

Each dose of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains the following ingredients: a total lipid
content of 1.93 mg (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG],
cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), 0.31 mg tromethamine,
1.18 mg tromethamine hydrochloride, 0.043 mg acetic acid, 0.20 mg sodium acetate trihydrate,
and 43.5 mg sucrose.

CONTRAINDICATION
Do not administer the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals with a known history of a
severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the Moderna COVID-19
Vaccine (see Full EUA Prescribing Information).

Risk Summary
All pregnancies have a risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general
population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically
recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively. Available data on Moderna
COVID-19 Vaccine administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccineassociated risks in pregnancy.
In a developmental toxicity study, 0.2 mL of a vaccine formulation containing the same quantity
of nucleoside-modified messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) (100 mcg) and other ingredients
included in a single human dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine was administered to female rats
by the intramuscular route on four occasions: 28 and 14 days prior to mating, and on gestation
days 1 and 13. No vaccine-related adverse effects on female fertility, fetal development, or
postnatal development were reported in the study.

14.1 Mechanism of Action
The nucleoside-modified mRNA in the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is formulated in lipid
particles, which enable delivery of the nucleoside-modified mRNA into host cells to allow
expression of the SARS-CoV-2 S antigen. The vaccine elicits an immune response to the S
antigen, which protects against COVID-19.

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Adverse reactions reported in a clinical trial following administration of the Moderna COVID-19
Vaccine include pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, chills,
nausea/vomiting, axillary swelling/tenderness, fever, swelling at the injection site, and erythema
at the injection site. (See Full EUA Prescribing Information)
Severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been reported following administration of
the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine during mass vaccination outside of clinical trials.
Additional adverse reactions, some of which may be serious, may become apparent with more
widespread use of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.

Fact sheet Janssen

Each 0.5 mL dose of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine is formulated to contain 5×1010 virus particles
(VP) and the following inactive ingredients: citric acid monohydrate (0.14 mg), trisodium citrate
dihydrate (2.02 mg), ethanol (2.04 mg), 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD) (25.50 mg),
polysorbate-80 (0.16 mg), sodium chloride (2.19 mg). Each dose may also contain residual
amounts of host cell proteins (≤0.15 mcg) and/or host cell DNA (≤3 ng).
Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine does not contain a preservative.
The vial stoppers are not made with natural rubber latex.
14 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
14.1 Mechanism of Action
The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine is composed of a recombinant, replication-incompetent human
adenovirus type 26 vector that, after entering human cells, expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)
antigen without virus propagation. An immune response elicited to the S antigen protects against
COVID-19.

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Adverse reactions reported in a clinical trial following administration of the Janssen COVID-19
Vaccine include injection site pain, headache, fatigue, myalgia, nausea, fever, injection site
erythema and injection site swelling. In clinical studies, severe allergic reactions, including
anaphylaxis, have been reported following the administration of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine
(see Full EUA Prescribing Information).
Additional adverse reactions, some of which may be serious, may become apparent with more
widespread use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine.
USE WITH OTHER VACCINES
There is no information on the co-administration of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine with other
vaccines.

COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen

EMA Logo

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/covid-19-vaccine-janssen#ecl-accordion-header-pan28

In The Netherlands, Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen are also used, as well as Astra Zeneca:

Astra Zeneca Insert

Wanneer mag u dit middel niet toegediend krijgen?

  1. Mogelijke bijwerkingen
    Zoals elk geneesmiddel kan ook dit vaccin bijwerkingen hebben, al krijgt niet iedereen daarmee te
    maken. Merkt u bijwerkingen die niet in deze bijsluiter staan, vertel het dan uw arts, apotheker of
    verpleegkundige.
    Zoek dringend medische hulp als u verschijnselen krijgt van een ernstige allergische reactie. De
    volgende klachten, of een combinatie ervan, kunnen wijzen op zo’n reactie:
  1. Inhoud van de verpakking en overige informatie
    Welke stoffen zitten er in dit middel?
    Eén dosis (0,5 ml) bevat:
    Chimpansee Adenovirus coderend voor de spike-glycoproteïne ChAdOx1-S van SARS-CoV-2*
    , niet
    minder dan 2,5 × 108 infectieuze eenheden. *
    Geproduceerd in genetisch gemodificeerde menselijke embryonale 293-niercellen (human embryonic
    kidney, HEK) en door recombinant-DNA-technologie.
    Dit product bevat genetisch gemodificeerde organismen (GMO’s, genetically modified organisms).
    De overige hulpstoffen zijn L-histidine, L-histidine-hydrochloridemonohydraat,
    magnesiumchloridehexahydraat, polysorbaat 80 (E 433), sucrose, dinatriumedetaat(dihydraat), water
    voor injecties (zie rubriek 2 ‘COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca bevat natrium en alcohol’).
    Hoe ziet COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca eruit en hoeveel zit er in een verpakking?
    Suspensie voor injectie (injectie). De suspensie is kleurloos tot lichtbruin, helder tot licht
    ondoorzichtig

Vaxzevria: AstraZeneca attempts to save its experimental shots by changing the name

The AstraZeneca COVID-19 shot is called “Covishield” in India. It is now called “Vaxzevria” in the European Union.

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM — The Nisour Square massacre took the lives of 17 Iraqi civilians on September 16, 2007. Six Blackwater employees faced murder and manslaughter charges. Four of them were sentenced to 30 years or life in prison. The incident left a major stain on the U.S. military contractor’s reputation and brand. No problem.

Blackwater changed its name to Xe Services, LLC. in 2009. It changed its name again to Academi in 2011, before merging with Constellis Holdings in 2014. Today “Blackwater” is still getting multi-billion dollar government contracts without anyone ever mentioning its real name and history. AstraZeneca is employing the same strategy hoping for the same results.

The Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 “vaccine” has by far the worst reputation of all the experimental shots. We’ve covered at least 10 deaths related to the AstraZeneca shots. Virtually every country using the experimental AstraZeneca shots suspended administration of them pending investigations. Authorities in some of said countries seized the shots as part of criminal investigations.

The British-Swedish pharmaceutical company is desperate to save its signature COVID-19 product and salvage its brand in the pharmaceutical world. So it changed its name.

AstraZeneca COVID-19 shot is now Vaxzevria

The Swedish Medical Products Agency (Läkemedelsverket) announced that the name change was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on March 25. The product itself remains unchanged. But Vaxzevria has different labeling and packaging that is distinct from the old AstraZeneca branding. The whole idea is to deflect attention from the flawed and deadly shots and start anew with different marketing strategies.

AstraZeneca is betting on the same results it has obtained in India. The Serum Institute of India produces the AstraZeneca shot under the brand name Covishield. Thus there has been no AstraZeneca news in India. The trademark application for “Vaxzevria” commenced in December. So this was not a spontaneous reaction to the bad publicity for the AstraZeneca shots. The name was likely intended for another product. But it was already available for this “emergency use” if you will.

It’s safe to say that most Europeans associate AstraZeneca with poison and danger. A YouGov survey released on March 21 found that 61% of French citizens view AstraZeneca/Vaxzevria shots as unsafe. A majority of Germans (55%) also believe the AstraZeneca/Vaxzevria shots are unsafe. Only 36% and 38% of Italians and Spaniards respectively, think the shots are safe. Interestingly, 77% of British survey participants think the AstraZeneca/Vaxzevria shots are safe.

https://www.pfizer.com/products/product-detail/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine
for Health Care Professionals: has color info


modernahttps://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/eua-fact-sheet-providers.pdf
white off white color

https://www.janssenlabels.com/emergency-use-authorization/Janssen+COVID-19+Vaccine-HCP-fact-sheet.pdf

colorless to slightly brown clear to slightly opaque

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-product-information-approved-chmp-29-january-2021-pending-endorsement_en.pdf

Better advice? Don’t get vaccinated at all! There are safe ways to really protect yourself against disease, also against Covid19.

virologist Shane Crotty, PhD on immunity after having had Covid/ The immunity is highest right after the disease.

The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis

By Prof Michel ChossudovskyGlobal Research, April 07, 2021

Professor of Public Health Allyson Pollock of New Castle University says PCR tests are not suitable for mass testing.

“The true test of intelligence is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don’t know what to do.” [8] The billions of pounds spent on contracts for tests without formal tender and bypassing tendering procedures reveals that thus far commercial interests have trumped the public health concerns. 

Communicable disease know-how built up over a century and more has been ignored. Experts in public health and communicable disease control and on the UK National Screening Committee have been sidelined, and replaced by captains of industry, most notably the appointment of Dido Harding and outsourcing of testing and tracing to Serco, Deloitte, and Amazon.

The long established rules and standards for scientific evaluation have not been followed. And nowhere is this more evident than in the reporting of UK test and trace data on cases. These make no distinction between people who are asymptomatic, presymptomatic, paucisymptomatic, and symptomatic, or whether infectious or not. A case is simply a positive test, regardless of symptoms and purpose of testing. And yet a case definition is key to evaluating the effectiveness of screening, contact tracing, and estimating secondary attack rates. [9] To add to the confusion and blur, since 27 January 2021 people testing positive with lateral flow tests (LFTs) are counted as cases under track and trace, and confirmatory PCR is no longer required. [10]

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/02/09/allyson-pollock-testing-testing-for-sars-cov-2-in-asymptomatic-people/

https://mewe.com/8714c466-e269-4330-a8a9-135bb53539b6

https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-race-for-a-covid-19-vaccine-explained

More Evidence Israelis Are Using Placebo COVID Vaccines — And Changed PCR Test To Prove Vaccines Are Working

February 5, 2021

Conclusion

Covid19 is a preventable, curable disease with a 97.83% survival rate world wide.

The vaccines, on the other hand, are objectionable and dangerous, no matter from which angle you approach it.

  1. So many people suffer side that articles are being written to reassure the vaccine works even if you have no side effects.
  2. Listed adverse reactions, include death, anaphylaxis, blood clots. facial palsey, deafness, blindness and the list goes on.
  3. Some doctors point out that the ingredients in the vaccines can cause prion disease, and if you look at the ingredients, this is not an outrageous claim, since transgenic cells are an ingredient of the vaccines and they are known to cause prion disease.
  4. Many doctors are warning against the vaccines and telling us there is no danger of Covid.
  5. It’s only because pf the change of the definition of pandemic which since 2009 includes any epidemic that spreads to more than one country, not just deadly ones, that covid19 is considered a pandemic. The International Epidemiology Association’s Dictionary of Epidemiology defines a pandemic as “an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people” Notably this definition makes an explicit reference to national borders.
  6. The ingredients of the vaccines are highly unethical: aborted baby tissue, gmo’s from transgenic mice tussies..
  7. The PEG’s and nano particles are known carcinogens.
  8. For those who know the Bible and see Yeshua as their Lord and Savior, there is a whole other level of awareness that should have all their alarms going off at the vaccine, the vaccine passports, and the whole system of oppression built around Covid19, which will be discussed here.

This means that when you are getting a Covid vaccine you are taking a 100% chance of getting injected with carcinogens from objectionable sources, to prevent a disease with a 2.17% fatality rate that can also be prevented and treated benignly.

It says in the insert that you should not take the vaccine if you are allergic to any of the ingredients. That means no one should take it, because carcinogens are deadly to everyone.

If you have a boss who requires you take it or lose your job, ask yourself if you really want to work for someone who is that ignorant or that cruel.

Data has shown that you can still get coronavirus even after you’re fully vaccinated, which means if you do get an infection, you could still spread it.

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/can-you-spread-covid-after-receiving-vaccine/2478894/

Worden ze wakker? Of is dit zelfs voor hun niet meer goed te praten?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xykNBLYMw8


Ze hadden nooit aan vaccins moeten beginnen. Zie:
https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2020/11/18/the-truth-about-the-corona-vaccines/


Wat vies is dit. Heb je één prik gehad ben je juist een broedplaats voor virussen beweren ze nu.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQukxuYsUgE


Trap er niet in! Hoe meer prikken, hoe slechter je af bent. Dit is hoe je echt beschermd bent tegen alle vormen van

c

https://scentses4d.wordpress.com/2020/11/28/flax-seeds-and-sunflower-seeds-can-prevent-illness-from-covid19/

May be an image of text that says '98% of French teachers say 'non' to AstraZeneca: Mass vaccination centre offering jab to over-55s is forced to close after just 58 people out of 3,000 signed up By Peter Allen In Paris and Chris Pleasance for MailOnline 13:15 18 Apr 2021, updated 15:24 18 Apr 2021'
May be an image of text

https://www.healthimaging.com/topics/diagnostic-screening/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-breast-mri

Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images in 72-year-old woman 10 days                 after she was vaccinated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A, Maximum                 intensity projection image, B, coronal multiplanar reformatted image, C, CT scan,                 and, D, fusion image show focally increased uptake in right deltoid muscle                 (arrowhead in B and D) and moderately increased uptake in two right axillary lymph                 nodes of normal size (arrows in A and C) that correspond with her recent COVID-19                 vaccination.

https://appliedradiology.com/articles/patients-vaccinated-for-covid-19-may-have-false-positive-imaging-results

https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.2020210030

Paris prosecutors seek involuntary manslaughter charges over AstraZeneca deaths

Issued on: 28/04/2021 – 15:55

And still they try to pretend that the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risks. Well, they obviously don’t. And besides, there are natural ways to really protect yourself from disease, also from Covid 19, without any side effects whatsoever. Vaccines are dangerous and unnecessary.

A month earlier, Italy had also charged Astra Zeneca with manslaughter after the death of a naval officer due to a covid vaccine.

Patricia Dijkema explains how the Covid vaccines disturb the cyclus and cause infertility.

-The cells in the uterus where the egg nestles after fertilization have the same spikes as those in the corona vaccine. —That means that when eggs get fertilized the body starts attacking the cells that cause fertility.

-In the spikes there are proteins that are also necessary for the formation of the placenta.

The cyclus is disturbed by the pressure that the swab puts on the pituitary gland, which regulates the cyclus. Also the turning of the swabs so deep in the nose gives wounds and infections, creating a gate way to the brain.

But what causes the menstrual cycles of women who come near the vaccinated people to be disturbed? Could there be a shedding of the spike vaccines? It looks like that is happening.

No research has been done on the effects of the covid vaccines on pregnancy.

VAERS says there have been 129 spontaneous abortions in the US due to the vaccines.

In men swelling of the scrotum and erectile problems can follow the vaccine, as well as emotional disturbances.

info@patriciadijkema.nl

If you live in the Netherlands report adverse reactions at lareb.nl

some people say you should wait 3 weeks before visiting vaccinated people te prevent adverse reactions from spike protein shedding.

https://www.facebook.com/115600180276143/videos/2205880102878587

Image
Exosome-associated Syncytin-1 and -2 allow specific entry of exosomes into target cells. Exosomes that harbor Syncytin-1 and -2 specifically target SCL1A4/5- and/or MFSD2a-expressing cells. The recognition and binding of Syncytins to their specific receptor, probably in association with other adhesion proteins (Steps 1 and 2), induce exosome endocytosis (Step 3), being potentially clathrin-mediated. Then, endosome maturation (from early to late endosomes) might bring a conformational change of Syncytins, thereby provoking fusion between exosomal and endosomal membranes (4 and 5). The exosome content is subsequently released in the cytoplasm of target cells, leading to cellular alteration. 

https://rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/5/R167.xml

Willem Engel in conversation with Andres Ferrante about the Covid vaccine. In Uruguay, May 1 2021. The spike protein binds to ACE2, That causes tromboses in the heart, it causes infertility in men, because ACE 2 is involved in sperm production, The mrna is implanted in the gene, and that gives a permanent change in the receptors. One of the objectives in the agenda 2030 us depopulation. Monkey vero cells are cancerous as well. These are in the vaccines also.

Andres Ferrante talks about the five laws of Dr Hamer. Dr Hamer showed there is a relationship between the psyche, brain and organs.

Dr Li changed the narrative pretending there was an ACE receptor in the lungs. But the ACE receptors are not in the lungs. they are in the reproductive systems.

They pretend that the virus binds to the ACE receptor, but there are no studies confirming this.

ACE is not expressed in the lungs, but it is in the heart, the testes ovaries and kidneys.

Look here for the full report from

JUNTA ARGENTINA DE REVISIÓN CIENTÍFICA

report

COVID-19 VACCINE TARGET
CHRONOLOGY

Here are some citations:

4.3) Preferential expression of ACE2: reaffirmation in testis
On January 28, 2002, Chad Vickers cites the work of Dr. Tipnis and reinforces the concept that
the distribution of ACE2 is restricted to “few tissues”, including kidney, heart, and testis.
The researcher who is the first author is Dr. Mary Donoghue.

In the next figure (Fig. 3), where it says A, there is a sequence of 23 human tissues. All this first
row of images corresponds to ACE2 where it can be seen, in slide N° 4, which is lung tissue, that
there is no expression at all. It shows again that the ACE2 enzyme is not expressed in lung
tissue. On the other hand, we can see an expression in slides N° 12 and N° 13, which again shows
that ACE2 is expressed in testicular tissue, and also in the ovaries.

This is the chart they are talking about:

They go on to say:

Then , out of the blue, on November 27th, 2003, almost 3 years after the publication in which the ACE2 enzyme was
discovered, where the main expression is in the testis (a concept reinforced by other authors in
subsequent years), it was published in Nature a work entitled “Angiotensin-converting enzyme
2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus” whose first author is Dr. Wenhui Li1
from
the Department of Medicine (Microbiology and Molecular Genetics), AIDS Research Center,
Bringham and Women’s Hospital. In his work he claims to have discovered that the S1 subdomain
of the SARS-CoV protein S “binds efficiently” with the metallopeptidase ACE2, thus constituting the
enzyme ACE2 as its cellular receptor mediating infection in target cells.

Dr Li provides no evidence for this, no research to counter what Dr Tipnis and other researchers said, what is the consensus:

Dr. Tipnis, discoverer of ACE2, and other groups, maintained at the same time, that
ACE2 is an enzyme of priority expression in testis …, and absent in lung.

Their conclusion of Dr Li’s study: “Due to these previous points, we consider that this article has no validity whatsoever, and that
it has to be urgently submitted to the consideration of the scientific community and especially
molecular biologists.”

4.6) Detection of intentionality or fraud analysis
The intention of all this, from our analysis and what we have been detailing, is that when an enzyme
is discovered that is practically expressed, not exclusively but mainly in the reproductive organs of
the human being, and it is tried, without complete scientific argument, through a chronological
sequence, shows that this enzyme is widely distributed in the human body, and that it would be the
entry point for a corona virus. This would serve as a strategy to hypothesize that an infection, by a
mutated coronavirus, could have a multi-organ effect and, eventually, a higher rate of mutability of
a corona virus by zoonotic transfection (that is, that, when jumping from one species to another,
the variant would become more lethal). In this way, it can be observed how the line of argument
has been prepared to say that a mutated corona virus could have a multi-organ involvement and,
on the other hand, divert the scientific community from the original knowledge that this enzyme
actually has strong functions reproductive factors in humans (and perhaps this is their main
function).

August 12th 2009, it was Fauci himself who was involved in changing the definition of pandemic so that it was not necessary to have many deaths: This was published in the magazine “The Journal Infectious
Diseases”

In fact, the number of deaths in the entire world, when the pandemic was declared had a global
mortality rate of 0.003%.

Dr. Fauci was related to the research and dissemination of HIV, and in the article in the journal
Nature by Wenhui Li (see point 4.5), where he was part of an HIV research team, a very suggestive
relationship is established between HIV (pandemic that the world was leaving), and influenza and
corona (next pandemics that the world was going to enter)
.

4.9) Forecasting scenarios for future pandemics
In May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Global Business Network, issued a report entitled
“Scenarios for the future of technology and International development” proposing and
anticipating a future scenario of pandemics (among others), with the need to implement consequent
actions (population control) .

5) Actual situation chronology

In the year 2000, a research group at the University of Leeds (England) discovered and characterized
an enzyme from the human body which is related to human reproduction, ACE2, which was only found in the ovaries, the testes, the heart and the kindneys.

Since 2003 a narrative was constructed that this enzyme widely distributed throughout the
body. (while there is no complete and scientific proof to support it),

.From this flimsy base, a vaccine was whose target of action would not be a virus, but the hypothetical
natural ligand of this virus, which is the ACE2 enzyme, and that enzyme, which is in the
reproductive organs of the human being, would be inhibited by applying a vaccine
.

https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)89003-6/fulltext

https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)89002-4/fulltext

https://rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/161/2/REP-20-0523.xml

https://rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/158/4/REP-19-0060.xml

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Exosome-associated-Syncytin-1-and-2-allow-specific-entry-of-exosomes-into-target-cells_fig3_268874980

Apparently , the 2003 study was not the first to claim ACE2 or ACEH was ubiquitous, as this article from 2002, not a scientific publication but one in Elsevier, makes the same claim.:

Elsevier August 12, 2002

Quantitative mRNA expression pro¢ling of ACE 2, a novel homologueof angiotensin converting enzyme More recently, parallel independent publications from two groups [6][7] revealed a novel gene which encodes a previously unidentified homologue of ACE which has been termed ACE 2 [6] or ACEH [7]. In its catalytic domain, this novel enzyme has approximately 42% identical residues with endothelial ACE. Both the groups reporting the discovery of this novel metalloproteinase also made significant strides in the initial characterisation of its activity. Importantly, ACE 2 is insensitive to classical small molecule inhibitors of human endothelial ACE such as captopril, lisinopril and enalaprilat [7]. Thus, if ACE 2 is shown to be of pathophysiological importance, it represents a novel target for medicinal chemistry driven drug discovery. In terms of enzymatic activity, ACE 2 also differs significantly from endothelial ACE in that it does not catalyse the formation of angiotensin II. Indeed, ACE 2 cleaves the C-terminal amino acid of angiotensin II to form angiotensin 1–7 [7][8] suggesting that ACE 2 may act to provide negative feedback regulation on the activity of the renin–angiotensin system. However, it has been shown that ACE 2 can also efficiently cleave the C-terminal residue from several peptides (apelin-13, dynorphin A 1–13) unrelated to the renin–angiotensin system [8]. Both of the groups which independently identified ACE 2 [6][7] used multi-tissue Northern blotting to gain an initial impression of tissue distribution and found that ACE 2 is expressed in human heart, kidney and testis, consistent with a possible role in cardio-renal function. However, further clarification and quantification of the tissue distribution of ACE 2 is important to help highlight the tissues to study to help elucidate the physiological role(s) of this novel enzyme and possible therapeutic target. In the present study, the quantitative and highly sensitive technique of quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) has been applied to study the transcriptional expression profile of ACE-2 (relative to the other known isoforms of ACE) throughout the human body.

And here is the study from Dr Harmer’s group in 2002:

Fig. 1. Stellar plot illustrating the mRNA copy number in logarithmic form for ACE (black), ACE 2 (red) and ACE testicular (blue) in 72 human tissues. Each point represents the geometric mean copy number from determinations in three donors. Gene copy number increases logarithmically moving from the centre to the periphery of the circle. The tissues used are: 1. heart: left atrium; 2. heart: left ventricle; 3. blood vessel: coronary artery; 4. oesophagus; 5. stomach: fundus; 6. stomach: body; 7. stomach: antrum; 8. stomach: pyloric canal; 9. duodenum; 10. jejunum; 11. ileum; 12. adipose: omental ileum; 13. blood vessel: mesenteric (colon); 14. caecum; 15. colon; 16. rectum; 17. gallbladder; 18. pancreas; 19. liver: parenchyma; 20. brain: cerebellum; 21. brain: hippocampus; 22. brain: locus coeruleus; 23. brain: medulla oblongata; 24. brain: amygdala; 25. brain: caudate; 26. brain: hypothalamus anterior; 27. brain: hypothalamus posterior; 28. brain: cortex: cingulate anterior; 29. brain: cortex: cingulate posterior; 30. brain: cortex: frontal-lateral; 31. brain: cortex: frontal-medial; 32. brain: cortex: occipital; 33. brain: cortex: parietal; 34. brain: cortex: temporal; 35. brain: nucleus accumbens; 36. brain: substantia nigra; 37. brain: dorsal raphe nucleus; 38. spinal cord; 39. dorsal root ganglion; 40. pineal gland; 41. pituitary gland; 42. blood vessel: choroid plexus; 43. blood vessel: cerebral: middle cerebral artery; 44. trachea; 45. lung: parenchyma; 46. lung: bronchus: primary; 47. lung: bronchus: tertiary; 48. blood vessel: pulmonary; 49. kidney: cortex; 50. kidney: medulla; 51. kidney: pelvis; 52. blood vessel: renal; 53. ureter; 54. bladder; 55. bladder: trigone; 56. ovary; 57. fallopian tube; 58. uterus: myometrium; 59. uterus: cervix; 60. prostate; 61. vas deferens; 62. testis; 63. spleen: parenchyma; 64. cell: blood mononuclear; 65. lymph gland: tonsil; 66. muscle: skeletal; 67. skin: foreskin; 68. adrenal gland; 69. thyroid gland; 70. umbilical cord; 71. placenta; 72. breast.

Whatever the case may be, it is worrisome that a vaccine targets a protein that has vital functions in the body. The fact that ACE2 is in the reproductive systems of both males and females would explain why females are experiencing problems with their cycles and experiencing miscarriages, and males are struggling with low sperm counts after having been injected with the covid shots.

Image
Chart showing the number of countries using each vaccine. Updated 15 March.

Countries that stopped roll out Astrea Zeneca

Infographic: Which Countries Have Stopped Using The AstraZeneca Vaccine? | Statista

South Africa halts rollout of AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine after shot falters against variant

 Feb. 7, 2021

Tinnitus reports grow amid COVID-19 vaccinations

The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database cites 152 reports of tinnitus among 25,072 COVID-19 recipients of vaccines from Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna. The database also has 11 reports of sudden hearing loss and 39 reports of hypoacusis (loss of hearing acuity).

Senator Hall, Senate committee on State Affairs

https://senate.texas.gov/cmte.php?c=570

-Covid vaccines are not FDA approved.

-VAERS reports that there are 30 vaccine deaths a day. usually that is 1 percent of what happens. In the 4 months of Covid vaccines, there have been more deaths from vaccines than in the 16 years before from all vaccines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSaCYVU6zH4

May be an image of text

HEALTH AND SCIENCE

The Seychelles is the most vaccinated nation on Earth. But Covid has surged

PUBLISHED THU, MAY 13 20211:23 AM EDTUPDATED THU, MAY 13 20215:09 AM EDT

Peter Doshi, one of the editors of the British Medical Journal :“Because lest we forget, all covid-19 vaccines currently in use in the US are available under emergency access only.””The situation is similar in Europe, where four covid-19 vaccines have been granted “conditional marketing authorisations,” a fast track mechanism that can be used in emergencies. These can be converted into standard “marketing authorisations” pending positive data after authorisation, but this has not yet happened for any covid-19 vaccine being administered.””…as of April 13, all placebo participants have been offered the Moderna covid-19 vaccine and 98% of those have received the vaccine.”2 In other words, the trial is unblinded, and the placebo group no longer exists.”

https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1244.full

There’s a lot you can do against covid. See also https://scentses4d.wordpress.com/2020/11/28/flax-seeds-and-sunflower-seeds-can-prevent-illness-from-covid19/

Bpris Johnson speaks of robots the faction of the size of red blood cell, swimming in our blood streams atatcking disease. Neural interface technology.

It seems these little robots are also in covid vaccines monitoring us, hooking us upo to big data and big finance:

Dolores Cahill warns of the dangers of heavy metals in vaccines, from 20210524: autism,.neuro cognitive decline, brain fog, neuro cognitive decline. When people who are injected, put on the mobile phone it becomes clear they have been digitally tattoo. ID 2020. They can be hooked up to digital interconnecting system. Patents have been given out for this.

De Ligt weigerde coronavaccin bij Oranje: ‘Baas over eigen lichaam zijn’

29 mei 2021

https://www.nu.nl/ek-voetbal/6136316/de-ligt-weigerde-coronavaccin-bij-oranje-baas-over-eigen-lichaam-zijn.html

William Shakespeare – the 81-year-old man who became the second person in the U.K. to receive a COVID-19 vaccine – has died.

Shakespeare, who goes by Bill, died of a stroke, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust said, according to BBC News.

In December, Shakespeare became the first man to receive a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, following 91-year-old Margaret Keenan, the first person in the country to get the shot. “It could make a difference to our lives from now on, couldn’t it?” he said at the time. “It’s started changing our lives and our lifestyle.”

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/william-shakespeare-covid-vaccine-first-man-uk-died/

SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans

Nature

Published: 

SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune response in humans.

in patients who experienced mild infections (n=77), serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antibodies decline rapidly in the first 4 months after infection and then more gradually over the following 7 months, remaining detectable at least 11 months after infection.

Byram W. Bridle, PhD , Immunologist May 31. 2021

The Spike protein itself is a toxin that circulates in the whole nody causing cardiovascular damage in the heart, crossing the blood brain barrier and causing brain clots. It also ninds to the ovaries and makes people infertile. It reaches babies through the breastmilk and makes babies ill. Children who receive the vaccine are getting heart inflamation.

The spike protein either causes bleeding or clotting. It binds to the platelet and accumulates in the spleen, the ovaries.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFLoptzGD6i0/

https://www.naturalnews.com/

Omega 6 binds the Spike Protein, so that might be a way to counter Covid shot damage, although it is always better to not take the shot of course

. See

How Flax seeds and Sunflower seeds can prevent illness from Covid19!

14 jun. 2021

Annemiek overleed na haar vaccinatie: ‘Neem ons verhaal serieus, scheep ons niet zomaar af’

De 74-jarige moeder van Jasper en Femke van Eck uit Breda is een van de 381 mensen die geregistreerd staan als ‘overleden na coronavaccinatie’. De zoektocht naar antwoorden verloopt moeizaam, en dat voelt eenzaam. ,,Er zit spanning op.”

https://www.ad.nl/binnenland/annemiek-overleed-na-haar-vaccinatie-neem-ons-verhaal-serieus-scheep-ons-niet-zomaar-af~a2766c44/

The WHO ,admits science is never settled.

Opening of the WHO global conference on communicating science during health emergencies, June 7, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHQugtsARyU

Zo ziet Vaccinatie-schade eruit. Het persoonlijke drama van Lisette Verhoeven…13 april ging Lisette Verhoeven voor de prik. Het AstraZeneca vaccin viel haar ten deel en dat terwijl en toch al de nodige ophef was in naburige landen rondom trombose bij jonge vrouwen. Lisette studeert Archeologie maar werkt ook parttime in een verzorgingstehuis met ouderen. Ze nam het vaccin voor hen maar besefte niet dat het haar eigen leven zou verwoesten. Ruim een week later kreeg ze een hersenbloeding waardoor ze op de IC belandde en lange tijd niet meer kon lopen. Dat gaat inmiddels weer redelijk maar haar mobiliteit aan de linkerzijde van haar lijf is miniem. Zo kan ze haar linkerhand niet meer gebruiken en vreest ze voor haar toekomst. VerdrietigProgrammamaker Flavio Pasquino bezocht Lisette in haar ouderlijk huis in Eindhoven en maakte een portret van de 28 jarige, die de wanhoop nabij is. Haar grote passies, zilversmeden en sieraden maken zal ze mogelijk nooit meer kunnen uitvoeren en dat maakt haar intens verdrietig. OudersDoor de weeks revalideert ze in een kliniek maar in de weekenden is ze bij haar ouders, Huub en Riëtte Verhoeven die speciaal voor deze uitzending naar de blckbx studio kwamen om hun verhaal te doen en te reflecteren op de reportage die we maakten over hun dochter.Misleidende CampagneRiëtte: “Heel die campagne, je doet het voor een ander, vind ik erg misleidend. Je kunt nog steeds anderen besmetten. Dus ja…je doet het voor een ander is leuk, maar kijk eens hoe Lisette er nu aan toe is”.Juridische ImplicatiesVolgende week volgt deel 2 waarin we de juridische implicaties gaan bespreken met twee advocaten, een voormalige GGD directeur en een huisarts. De vraag is namelijk…wie is aansprakelijk voor de schade die Lisette nu heeft opgelopen? Volgens de landsadvocaat – die 24 februari – een uitspraak deed – is dat de arts onder wiens BIG nummer er die dag geprikt wordt en daarmee zullen vragen rondom “informed consent”, de “eed van hippocrates” oftewel de artse-eed en de “Code van Neurenberg” zeker ter tafel komen.https://www.blckbx.tv/videos/zo-ziet-vaccinatie-schade-eruitNB Wat wij het meest heftig vinden aan dit gesprek? Dat is dat deze mensen duidelijk verwoorden dat er eigenlijk geen werkelijk vrije keuze meer is en hoe ‘Informed Consent’ al helemaal niet aan de orde is. Dat keuzes gemaakt worden gebaseerd op vakantie plannen, of het goed willen doen voor de ander. En daarbij wegen slachtoffers zoals deze vrouw blijkbaar minder zwaar dan covid slachtoffers.Wat een gevaarlijke hellend vlak is in de samenleving, en wat deze mensen nu opeens zien.#vrijekeuze#blckbx#VrouwenVoorVrijheid

May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'blckbx.tv Zo ziet Vaccinatie-schade eruit. Het persoonlijke drama van Lisette Verhoeven... 38:51'

Received: 2 June 2021 / Revised: 19 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021

Update: “For three deaths prevented by vaccination, we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination.”

The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy

Background: COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination.

Dr Sherri Tenpenny explains how the vaccines will start working in 3 to 6 months, which is from July 7, 2021.

You must ask what’s coming through the needle.

A vaccine is a molecule that is injected into your body and creates an antibody

The problem uis that the antibodies the covid vaccines produce are toxic.

72 vaccines that are approved in the US.

Messenger RNA has never been used in vaccines.

Normally whole virusses are used.

But with Covid, just a part of the genetics / Just the spike.

Ubstead of antibodies, Antinody Depoendent Engancement.

In binds to your transcriptase, and replicates over and over.

The way the spike protein causes harm is

Y FAS fragments, FAC fragment: they neutralize the antibodies.

It hooks on to the macrofage, and replicates over and over again.

It has an on switch, but not an off switch.

It is called trohan horse.

2. The second mechanism, the FAC can go into the lungs and cause diffuse aveolar damage. it starts to break doen the lungs. the anti bodies cause puss, and bleeding to the lungs. The anytibody damages lungs

3. the spike protein antibody starts to attack the type 2 white bloodcells. TType 1 macrofages are type 1 infection fighters. Highly inflammatory. The type 2 macrofages are non inflammatory. Type 1 fights infecrion, type 2 heals it. The spike protein inactivates the type 2 macrophages.

In vaccinated animals, there were no type 2 macrophages.

People will start dying within 3 to 6 months.

The reexposure causes the disease.

There are 36 corona virusses.

The non binding corona virusses.

People will die from anafylactic shock.

Some will die immediately. Most after 42 days.

6 part series on corona virus. You can see that on her blog on the vaxxter website, mentioned below.

Pfizer has three new ingredients that have never been used before. And they have never been tested together.

Grade 3 and 4 side effects.

https://videobanned.nl/aiovg_videos/explains-how-the-depopulation-mrna-vaccines-will-start-working-in-3-6-months-2021-07-07-dr-8-2-2021/

Dr Sherri Tenpenny’s website:

VAXXTER

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES EXPOSING VACCINE MYTHS AND PHARMA FOIBLES

https://vaxxter.com/category/drt_blog/

How side effects are graded:

https://i-base.info/ttfa/4-side-effects-of-arvs/12-how-side-effects-are-graded/

Watch 1-Hour Version of Censored Interview With Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Technology

Watch this 1-hour version of the original “Dark Horse Podcast” featuring an interview with Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology. YouTube and other platforms censored the video.

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the dayIt’s free.

In June, Dr. Bret Weinstein interviewed Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, and Steve Kirsch, philanthropist and tech entrepreneur who has become a respected force in the quest to give voice to people who have been harmed by COVID vaccines.

The 3.5 hour “DarkHorse Podcast” interview was censored on YouTube and other major social media platforms. Five days after the DarkHorse podcast was published, Malone’s scientific accomplishments and contributions were scrubbed from Wikipedia.

Thanks to filmmaker Mikki Willis and his team for creating this 1-hour version of the original podcast exclusive for The Defender.

During the podcast, Malone, Weinstein and Kirsch touch on the implications of the controversial Japanese Pfizer biodistribution study, made public earlier this month by Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist.

The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle showed lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine did not stay in the deltoid muscle where they were injected as the vaccine’s developers claimed would happen, but circulated throughout the body and accumulated in large concentrations in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and  — in “quite high concentrations” — in the ovaries.

Malone also discusses the lack of proper animal studies for the new mRNA vaccines, and the theory, espoused by virologist Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D., that mass vaccination with the mRNA vaccines could produce ever more transmissible and potentially deadly variants.

Normal number of vaccine deaths, and number of covid vaccine deaths.

Covid vaccine is judged unfit for humans.

Mark Rutte ‘Vaccin mogelijk dodelijker dan virus onder 60’ (AZ) – Persconferentie Corona maatregelen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xykNBLYMw8

Vaccinatie van daklozen, illegalen en asielzoekers begint eind mei met vaccin van Janssen

Ook daklozen, ongedocumenteerden, bewoners van asielzoekerscentra en andere doelgroepen die buiten de boot dreigden te vallen voor de beschermende prik, komen in aanmerking voor vaccinatie.Charlotte Huisman12 mei 2021, 06:51

 WO 26 MEI, 12:48

België vaccineert 41-minners voorlopig niet met Janssen na overlijden vrouw

 WO 26 MEI, 12:48

Een priklocatie in Dordrecht ANP

CORONAVACCINNOS NIEUWS • BINNENLAND • WO 2 JUNI, 20:07

Is het Janssen-vaccin nu afgeschreven? En drie andere vragen

We zitten in een nieuwe fase van de vaccinatiestrategie, stelt de Gezondheidsraad. Daarin moeten jongere mensen die nog niet zijn geprikt het vaccin van Pfizer of Moderna krijgen. En dus géén Janssen. Belangrijke redenen zijn dat het vaccin een zeer zeldzame maar ernstige bijwerking heeft en dat het minder effectief is dan de mRNA-vaccins.

Betekent dit het einde van het Janssen-vaccin in Nederland?

Niet per definitie. Volgens de Gezondheidsraad bevinden we ons nu in een luxe positie waarin we kunnen kiezen uit verschillende vaccins, en waarin Janssen niet de beste optie is. “Dat Janssen-vaccin is effectief, is voldoende veilig, maar als je een keuze hebt is het onlogisch om het vaccin met een potentiële bijwerking te kiezen”, zei Gezondheidsraad-voorzitter Bart-Jan Kullberg in Nieuws & Co op NPO Radio 1.

Ook benadrukt de raad dat er groepen zijn waarvoor Janssen wél de beste keuze kan zijn. Dat geldt bijvoorbeeld voor “groepen die via de reguliere kanalen moeilijk te bereiken zijn voor een tweede vaccinatie.” De minister liet vanmiddag weten dat Janssen nog wel wordt ingezet voor bijvoorbeeld zeevarenden en daklozen.

Maar op de lange termijn wil de Europese Commissie vooral mRNA-vaccins inzetten in Europa. De Europese Commissie besloot vorige maand om geen AstraZeneca meer in te kopen, maar bestelde wel zo’n 1,8 miljard extra doses van Pfizer. Of de Commissie Janssen blijft bijbestellen, moet nog blijken.

Hoeveel is er al geprikt met Janssen?

Er zijn ongeveer 160.000 prikken gezet met Janssen. Volgens GGD GHOR Nederland stonden er nog 167.000 vaccinaties met Janssen gepland.

De geplande vaccinaties kunnen nog wel afgezegd worden, maar mensen kunnen die ook op “een verantwoorde manier laten doorgaan,” stelt het ministerie van VWS. Ook mensen die al gevaccineerd zijn met Janssen kunnen “gerust zijn op die keuze”, want volgens VWS blijft het vaccin veilig en effectief.

Nederland loopt ‘maar’ een week vertraging op. Hoe zit dat?

Die week vertraging komt uit modelleringen van het RIVM. De Gezondheidsraad schrijft dat uit die modellen blijkt dat doorprikken met alleen Pfizer en Moderna ongeveer een week vertraging oplevert voor het vaccinatieprogramma.

Een woordvoerder van het RIVM nuanceert die uitspraak. “Die week geldt in het scenario zoals de Gezondheidsraad het adviseerde en waarin alle ingeplande afspraken met Janssen blijven staan.” Maar demissionair minister De Jonge heeft besloten dat iedereen zijn Janssen-afspraak mag omboeken.

“Het effect van het omboeken wordt nu gemodelleerd”, aldus de RIVM-woordvoerder. Sommige mensen zullen snel een nieuwe afspraak kunnen maken. De GGD verwacht dat 10 tot 15 procent van de mensen met een afspraak voor het Janssen-vaccin zal afzien van die prik. Dat zei GGD-directeur Sjaak de Gouw in het radioprogramma Dit is de Dag.

Ook speelt een rol dat we veel meer vaccins van Pfizer ontvangen dan van Janssen. Dat was al de planning, maar vanaf eind april ging Pfizer meer vaccins leveren dan gepland. Aan de andere kant levert Janssen juist minder dan beloofd. De Jonge verwacht ook daarom dat deze wijziging een klein effect heeft op de vaccinatiesnelheid.

Wat doen we met vaccins die we overhouden?

Die gaan uiteindelijk waarschijnlijk naar landen die ze nog hard nodig hebben. Zo stuurt Nederland waarschijnlijk volgende week 40.000 AstraZeneca-vaccins naar Suriname, omdat het land zwaar is getroffen door de coronapandemie. Het is de bedoeling dat er in totaal 500.000 tot 750.000 doses verzonden worden.

In juli hebben alle volwassenen in Nederland die dat willen hun eerste prik gehad, is nu de verwachting. Vanaf dat moment hebben we waarschijnlijk vaccins over. Overschotten zal Nederland voornamelijk doneren aan lage- en middeninkomenslanden die zelf geen vaccins kunnen kopen.

WHO-baas Tedros spreekt over ‘schandalige ongelijkheid’ bij de distributie van vaccins. Rijke landen hebben bijna alle vaccins opgekocht, waardoor veel armere landen nagenoeg niemand hebben ingeënt.

Wat houdt die zeldzame bijwerking nou precies in? NOS op 3 legt het uit:

https://nos.nl/collectie/13850/artikel/2383350-is-het-janssen-vaccin-nu-afgeschreven-en-drie-andere-vragen

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FIRqA183NqJL/

Zo ziet Vaccinatie-schade eruit. Het persoonlijke drama van Lisette Verhoeven… 13 maart ging Lisette Verhoeven voor de prik. Het AstraZeneca vaccin viel haar ten deel en dat terwijl en toch al de nodige ophef was in naburige landen rondom trombose bij jonge vrouwen. Lisette studeert Archeologie maar werkt ook parttime in een verzorgingstehuis met ouderen. Ze nam het vaccin voor hen maar besefte niet dat het haar eigen leven zou verwoesten. Ruim een week later kreeg ze een hersenbloeding waardoor ze op de IC belandde en lange tijd niet meer kon lopen. Dat gaat inmiddels weer redelijk maar haar mobiliteit aan de linkerzijde van haar lijf is miniem. Zo kan ze haar linkerhand niet meer gebruiken en vreest ze voor haar toekomst. Verdrietig Programmamaker Flavio Pasquino bezocht Lisette in haar ouderlijk huis in Eindhoven en maakte een portret van de 28 jarige, die de wanhoop nabij is. Haar grote passies, zilversmeden en sieraden maken zal ze mogelijk nooit meer kunnen uitvoeren en dat maakt haar intens verdrietig. Ouders Door de weeks revalideert ze in een kliniek maar in de weekenden is ze bij haar ouders, Huub en Riëtte Verhoeven die speciaal voor deze uitzending naar de blckbx studio kwamen om hun verhaal te doen en te reflecteren op de reportage die we maakten over hun dochter. Misleidende Campagne Riëtte: “Heel die campagne, je doet het voor een ander, vind ik erg misleidend. Je kunt nog steeds anderen besmetten. Dus ja…je doet het voor een ander is leuk, maar kijk eens hoe Lisette er nu aan toe is”. Juridische Implicaties Volgende week volgt deel 2 waarin we de juridische implicaties gaan bespreken met twee advocaten, een voormalige GGD directeur en een huisarts. De vraag is namelijk…wie is aansprakelijk voor de schade die Lisette nu heeft opgelopen? Volgens de landsadvocaat – die 24 februari – een uitspraak deed – is dat de arts onder wiens BIG nummer er die dag geprikt wordt en daarmee zullen vragen rondom “imformed consent”, de “eed van hippocrates” oftewel de artse-eed en de “Code van Neurenberg” zeker ter tafel komen. Klokkenluider Sinds kort hebben we een klokkenluider project gelanceerd. Heb jij belangrijke & betrouwbare informatie uit eerste hand, maar wil je om welke reden dan ook wél anoniem blijven voor het publiek? Dat kan! Kijk voor meer info hier: https://www.blckbx.tv/klokkenluider

Na een trage start is Nederland de laatste tijd in hoog tempo gestegen op de wereldwijde vaccinatieranglijsten. Enorme delen van de bevolking lijken volledig langs elkaar heen te leven; waar velen zielsgelukkig lijken met hun prik, volledig in de veronderstelling dat zij daarmee hun oude leven hebben herwonnen, zijn anderen als de dood voor de mogelijke gezondheidsrisico’s die de injecties met zich meebrengen. Op basis van het mediadieet dat wordt gevolgd houden mensen er de meest uiteenlopende ideeën op na. Medische verrichtingen dienen echter altijd te gebeuren onder voorwaarde van ‘informed consent’: een informatieplicht van de arts en een toestemmingsvereiste van de patiënt. Wie een verrichting ondergaat dient vooraf, op begrijpelijke en volledige wijze, ingelicht te worden over de aard en het doel van de behandeling, wat de diagnose en prognose zijn, welke risico’s aan de behandeling verbonden zijn en welke alternatieven mogelijk zijn. Dankzij de op volle toeren draaiende propagandamachine van de staat lijkt een groot deel van de bevolking hier amper bij stil te staan – inclusief artsen en andere specialisten. En dat terwijl een van de door Viruswaarheid gevoerde rechtszaken tegen de staat saillant genoeg heeft uitgewezen dat het diezelfde artsen zijn bij wie de verantwoordelijkheid voor ‘informed consent’ wordt neergelegd… Om ervoor te zorgen dat men daadwerkelijk tot een goedgeïnformeerd en weloverwogen besluit kan komen met betrekking tot het al dan niet accepteren van een injectie heeft mr. Sven Hulleman een vragenlijst opgesteld die meegenomen kan worden naar de prikafspraak. Jordy Zwarts van de Nationale Bond tegen Overheidszaken was te gast om de vragenlijst te bespreken én direct in de praktijk te brengen. Vragenlijst informed consent: https://eenoorlogreedsverloren.nl/vra… Overige links: KNMG-richtlijnen informed consent: https://www.knmg.nl/advies-richtlijne… Van vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid | #3.10: https://youtu.be/mexgHGJNbG0 Nationale Bond tegen Overheidszaken: https://bondoverheidszaken.nl/

We mogen, en misschien ook wel terecht, mopperen op de registratie van vaccinatieschade. Een onderzoek van Harvard wees eerder uit dat “slechts” 1% van de bijwerkingen überhaupt, en 1 tot 13% van de zeer ernstige en dodelijke bijwerkingen wordt gemeld.

Echter: binnen Europees verband scoort Lareb wel het hoogste aantal gemelde bijwerkingen van de Kroon-prikjes.

Of Nederlanders kleinzerig zijn, angstiger of is gewoon “ons” Lareb beter dan de andere registratiebureaus? … Wie zal het zeggen.

May be an image of text that says 'ICSR per 100K Vaccinations Doses Administered Comparing member states against Total Data: |Source: ECDC Netherlands Estonia Luxembourg Iceland Austria Latvia Norway Denmark 412 411 353 331 268 254 236 199 Portugal 8.840K 663K 329K 231K 4.768K 473K 1,404K 3.065K 32.099K Bulgaria EUToa France Croatia Lithuania Sweden Spain Belgium Finland Czechia 5.181K 2.339K 1.262K 32.801K 1.605K 1.472K 4.764K 25.284K Greece Cyprus Slovenia Hungary Germany Slovakia Romania Liechtenstein Poland 30 6.266K 806K 4.956K 458K 5.200K 533K 949K 4.859K UAve 45.1 3K 250% 300% 350% Relative 450% 30% 2.436K 7.334K 17K 20% 15% Doses Relative Total 19.172K 10% 5% 0%'

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky on spike protein shedding

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcAXxeWK-Ew

Apr 21, 2021

The government’s chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance said 60% of those taken to hospital with COVID-19 have been vaccinated twice,

https://news.sky.com/5cd60841-9909-42fa-acdb-ce9bf6a2696f

Infections and deaths after vaccination

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr7AO2NvalI

Apr 17, 2021

Perspectives on the Pandemic | “Blood Clots and Beyond” | Episode 15

In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections. Since then, two of the four injections have been suspended or recalled in Europe and the United States for just that reason. In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the problem, why it is not just limited to the products already suspended, and why in the long term we may be creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subject

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyPjAfNNA-U

𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖘𝖊 𝕸𝖆𝖈𝖆𝖇𝖗𝖊

Apr 16, 2021

JULY 22, 2021 Eric Clapton Says He Won’t Play Venues That Require Proof of VaccinationBy Reuters Staff2 MIN READLOS ANGELES (Variety.com) – Eric Clapton will not perform at venues that require proof of vaccination.“Following the PM’s announcement on Monday the 19th of July 2021, I feel honour bound to make an announcement of my own: I wish to say that I will not perform on any stage where there is a discriminated audience present. Unless there is provision made for all people to attend, I reserve the right to cancel the show,” Clapton said via statement posted onto architect, film producer and anti-vaxxer Robin Monotti Graziadei’s Telegram account.The news follows U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s announcement Tuesday that as restrictions on social gatherings lift, nightclubs must require guests to show a Covid Pass from the U.K.’s National Health Service upon entry for everyone over the age of 18.Clapton has been releasing anti-vaccination and anti-lockdown statements and songs for close to a year now. In December 2020, Clapton joined fellow classic rocker turned anti-vaxxer Van Morrison on his song, “Stand and Deliver.” The song features lyrics including, “Do you wanna be a free man / Or do you wanna be a slave?” and “Dick Turpin wore a mask too.” See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DirL4RI1448In an earlier release Clapton detailed a “disastrous” experience with the AstraZeneca vaccine for which he blamed “propaganda” for pushing on him. The musician continued on revealing that he suffers from “peripheral neuropathy and should never have gone near the needle.”A rep for Clapton did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

18 REDENEN WAAROM IK HET COVID-VACCIN NIET GA HALEN

Most COVID deaths in England now are in the vaccinated

July 15, 2021

20210724

No photo description available.

Arts: gevaccineerde moet weten dat hij coronavirus kan doorgeven

20 juli 2021, 18:18 • Binnenland

De Delta-variant van het coronavirus verspreidt zich mogelijk sneller onder volledig gevaccineerden, maar hier is nog te weinig aandacht voor in de maatschappij. Dat zegt arts-microbioloog Heiman Wertheim van het Nijmeegse ziekenhuis Radboud UMC. Hierdoor “blijft het probleem mogelijk langer doorsudderen”.

https://www.lc.nl/binnenland/Arts-gevaccineerde-moet-weten-dat-hij-coronavirus-kan-doorgeven-26950739.html

Dit is een krantenkop uit 1989 en gaat over kippen. Veel wetenschappers verwachten wel dat het huidige Covid vaccin nieuwe ziektes zal veroorzaken vanwege het adenovirus wat erin zit wat van apen komt en wilde virussen erin kan hebben. . Maar dat is nog onvoldoende onderzocht.

May be an image of text that says 'Verrassende conclusie van Universiteit Utrecht Vaccin tegen corona- virus veroorzaakt nieuwe ziekten waait" UTRECHT (COR) Het accineren van kippen tegen coronavirus (IBM) brengt accin bestrijdt moment optredende buitenland. zoals kop evend vinus, namelijk gemaakt genetisch materiaal buiten vormen, grote ge- ናදn ziektebeelden. Nieuw vaccin rzou nieuw virussen Wat afdoende bescherming bicden. Gedrag afdocnde. Oplossing oplos- tegen Bultenland'

This is when the test periods of the vaccines will end:

May be an image of text that says 'Moderna Pfizer / BioNtech december 2022 Janssen december 2023 31 december 2023 AstraZeneca / VaxZevria 31 maart 202 20:02/ 20:02/45:25'

Way back in March 2020,Dr John Ioannidis of Stanford University already said it would be a horrible idea to skip the test fase, because the last time Corona vaccines were tested 30 years ago in felines, the vaccinated population actually had worse disease outcomes than the unvaccinated, because they were over sensitized to Covid, exactly what Sucharit Bhakdi says.

Investigative journalist Sam Husseini has had a storied career asking world leaders questions they would prefer to dodge, on subjects ranging from missing weapons of mass destruction to very real nuclear stockpiles. Now he takes on the “elephant in the room”: the extreme dangers posed by bio-research facilities not just in China, but all over the world…

In this “monopoly edition” of Perspectives, Matt Stoller, author of Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy, forecasts the actual amount of the Wall Street bailout; the coming disappearance of most small business; the problems that emerge when monopolies control health care; the emergence of a Wall Street-oriented “planned economy”; the failure of progressives to stop the theft of trillions, and much more.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spi-m-o-summary-of-further-modelling-of-easing-restrictions-roadmap-step-2-31-march-2021

At 11:42 Mike Yeadon says that you’re immune for life if you have ever encountered a SARS virus. Not only for the virus., but also for all variants.

17″00 There is never a reason for you to need to know someone’s vaccine status.The reason for the vaccine passport is total control and will take away our liberties for as long as theye xist.

For the whole Perspectives on the Pandemic series by Journeyman, look here.

https://www.thepressandthepublic.com/latest

Farmaconcern Pfizer produceerde tot nu toe ruim een miljard coronavaccins. Daarmee verdiende het in de eerste helft van dit jaar ruim 3 miljard dollar. Koos Schwartz28 juli 2021, 19:47

<img src="https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/224458086_1404897879888343_846217255763564165_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=wUYS84Hvfn0AX_N5n3c&_nc_ht=scontent-cdg2-1.xx&oh=eb2bb06ae362b5cce347c630e9464b52&oe=61277DB3&quot; alt="May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'Maxime Beltra 22 ans Hier à 14h il recevait sa 1ère injection Pfizer pour pouvoir se rendre en Grece avec un ami, à 23h il décédait (choc allergique) Message de Frédéric le papa:

22 Jaar. Eergisteren (dinsdag 26 juli 2021) om 14 uur eerste injectie Pf.z.r om op vakantie te kunnen gaan in Griekenland met een vriend. Om 23 uur overleden (allergische shock)

Boodschap van zijn vader:
Dat zijn gezicht de hele wereld over gaat en dat hij het vaandel mag zijn voor vrijheid om te leven, te denken en de opstand.

Le décès de Maxime Beltra relance le débat sur la vaccination des jeunes

Comme souvent, l’information est d’abord apparue sur les réseaux sociaux, dans la soirée du mardi 27 juillet, avec la vidéo d’un homme indiquant que son fils de 22 ans est décédé quelques heures après avoir reçu une dose de vaccin. Une information que certains partisans de la vaccination à marche forcée ont d’abord nié, comme Jean-Louis Gagnaire, soutien de la première heure d’Emmanuel Macron et auteur d’un tweet scandaleux que nous relayons ici, qui a aussitôt prétendu que la mort du jeune homme était une « invention des antivax ».

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3lvTWlEos8

À Sète (Hérault), un jeune homme de 22 ans, Maxime Beltra, est décédé le lundi 26 juillet après avoir reçu sa première dose du vaccin Pfizer. Le père de Maxime Beltra incrimine le gouvernement : «Ce sont des criminels, des criminels de mettre sur le marché des vaccins qui n’ont pas été vérifiés. Cette corruption est à vomir, à vomir. J’ai perdu mon fils, mon aîné, pour un virus […] Vous êtes des criminels, des criminels corrompus, vous êtes des criminels et vous savez très bien ce que vous êtes en train de faire !» Le parquet de Montpellier a ouvert une enquête judiciaire et ordonné une autopsie afin de déterminer la cause précise du décès. https://www.laminutedericardo.com/LMD…https://twitter.com/barbeauroch5/stat… PayPal : https://paypal.me/LMIsoutiens?locale…. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Mediaindepen… Tiktok : https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMdgrdp5Q/ Twitter : https://twitter.com/LeMediaLMI?s=09 Snapchat : https://www.snapchat.com/add/lemediai… Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/invites/con…SHOW LESS

Pfizer data suggest third dose of Covid-19 vaccine ‘strongly’ boosts protection against Delta variant

July 28 2021

In this video it is claimed that Pfizer and Moderna Covid19 contain Graphene Oxide.

Pegalations with alpha numeric code, claims former Pfizer employee Karen Kingston.

Graphene oxide is not on the patent. It is the main ingredient in hydro gel, and it is poisonous. Hydrogel is wjat links humans yo the internet. Seems like a dose finding study. We are going to get boostes every month. Then they have enough for thought control,

4 lipids in vaccines:. They are there to protect the MRNA. MRNA is very vulnerable. 4 lipids and graphene oxide.l That is virtually indistructable.

https://rumble.com/vkgdq7-deadly-shots-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-covid-vaccine.htm

𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖘𝖊 𝕸𝖆𝖈𝖆𝖇𝖗𝖊

Kary Mullis: Inventor Of The PCR Test! 4 Fun Facts!

Listen To Elon Musk Talk About Synthetic mRNA & Where It’s Heading!

May be an image of text that says 'Compulsory workplace vaccination rules cannot apply to vegans Warning by lawyers highlights ethical issues in trying to force all workers to have jabs'

Is that because of the aborted fetus cells or because of the animal cells?
*asking for a friend— at Asking For A Friend.

May be an image of text that says 'Brenda Manning Just now Pfizer is making a killing! According to Nazdaq, they made $18.98 billion in the second quarter 2021 alone (obviously huge profit from the vax) BUT their drug Eliquis rose 13% (that's for blood clots) & their drug Vyndaquel rose by 77% (that's for cardiomyopathy).. see how Big Pharma works? What a strategy!'

20,595 DEAD 1.9 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=394235971808907

May be an image of text
May be an image of one or more people and text that says 'THE LANCET Login CORRESPONDENCE ONLINEFIRST Spike-antibody waning after second dose of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 Madhumita Shrotri Annalan MD Navaratnam Vincent Nguyen Thomas Byrne Cyril eismar tal Show all authors Ellen Fragaszy Published: July 15, 2021 DOI: http:/o.or/.1.101/04-736201642 PlumX Metrics Antistoffen na Pfizer en AstraZeneca vaccinatie beginnen af te nemen na 6 weken, zo blijkt uit een nieuwe publicatie in The Lancet. Na 10 weken kan het aantal antistoffen al met meer dan 50% zijn gedaald. htts://wwhelanet.com/oumals/anet /rtice/PlSO10-673621)1642-1/ulet 0223:13 23:13'

Zeven mensen in Zaventum overleden aan covid 19 terwijl ze volledig gevaccineerd waren

20210806 om 07:02 door sgg | Bron: RADIO 1 – Print – Corrigeer

Bijna 7.000 Belgen toch nog besmet na dubbele vaccinatie: kunnen we dan nóóit het normale leven hervatten? “Kom zeker buiten, maar wees voorzichtig”

25/07/2021 om 15:30

Corona-uitbraak in woonzorgcentrum Nijvel ondanks vaccinatie, 12 mensen overleden:

23 juni 2021

May be an image of text that says 'Wekelijkse trend % Positief getest Bron: RIVM en NICE -% Ziekenhuis opnames IC Opnames % Overleden Daling % positieve testen relatie geen ZwartAngstpraat disco voor Code Testen mlefan นออย tilefae นออะ Stabiel sinds 1-sept 0707 9-3-2020 30-3-2020 20-4-2020 11-5-2020 6620 1-6-2020 22-6-2020 13-7-2020 -7-20 8-202 0-8-2020 3-8-2020 24-8-2020 14-9-2020 5-10-2020 26-10-2020 16-11-2020 7-12-2020 28-12-2020 18-1-2021 8-2-2021 1-3-2021 22-3-2021 12-4-2021 3-5-2021 5-5-2021 24-5-2021 14-6-2021 5-7-2021'
May be an image of one or more people and text that says 'The Definition of the word VACCINE Has now been changed They have now included gene modification vaccine noun Save Word vac-cine vak- yak- sẽn Definition vaccine Merriam- Webster by injection) response against specific infectious disease: anantigenic typically nactivated ATTENUATEDs stimulate the body's immune attenuated vius)o preparation RNA) ue (such fragment toxin) of asd strand synthesized body produce anantigenicsubstance virus spike protein)'

The speaker in the following video is Dr Dan Stock,577 West 7 Mccordsville Indiana.

https://twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1424603849952829442

Image

https://meaww.com/who-is-dan-stock-indiana-docs-claims-about-futility-of-masks-in-covid-19-in-video-go-viral

Here is his talk again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7v_0K3kV60

Here you can see the whole meeting:

MVCSC School Board Meeting – 8/6/21

448,085 viewsStreamed live on Aug 6, 2021

The Mt. Vernon Community School Corporation is located in Fortville, IN and is home of five award-winning schools. Engage, Educate and Empower Students!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUjkSaedN4g

http://www.greenfieldreporter.com/2021/08/07/mt-vernon-mulling-covid-19-protocols-after-feedback/

Edward Nirenberg wrote this as a reaction to Dr. Dan Stock’s talk:

https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/addressing-dr-daniel-stock-claims

Who is Edward Nirenberg?

About Edward Nirenberg

I write about vaccines here. You can find me on Twitter @enirenberg and at deplatformdisease.com (where I publish the same content without a paywall)

https://edwardnirenberg.medium.com/about

This is his blog

https://www.deplatformdisease.com/?author=5f1c5fadcac6060c5891958f

This is his twitter account:


Edward Nirenberg@ENirenberg·I have a bigger audience now (still don’t get how that happened) than I’m used to so I need to clarify some things about me. Firstly, I am not a public health expert, nor an expert on COVID-19, pandemics generally, virology, infectious disease, or medicine.

Edward Nirenberg is quite a busy pro vax blogger. So in the anti vax camp, we have medical doctors and PhD’s, in the provax camp we have big pharma minions and apparently someone like Edward Nirenberg who does this as a hobby?

Or I wonder on who’s payroll he is.

He starts off with trying to discredit Dr Dan Stock, for using the term functional family medicine physician,a personalized, systems-oriented model that empowers patients and practitioners to achieve the highest expression of health by working in collaboration to address the underlying causes of disease.

With this Edward Nirenberg implies Dr Stock has no right to say anything, as if he is not a liscensed MD, but Dr Stock’s linked in profile shows he most certainly is an MD. See https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-stock-62b72074/

Indiana University School of Medicine

Doctor of Medicine (MD)

Medicine

1984 – 1988

So the one who discredits himself early on is not Dr Stock, it is Edward Nirenberg, by slandering an honest and courageous doctor!

Comment:

The reactions to the vaccine are what you would expect from a poison.

There are only negative things to say about the Covid vaccines, nothing positive. It is not a case of there are risks to everything. The ones giving these dangerous shots have zero liability. You should not even want to buy a cauliflower under those conditions! There are safe ways to become and stay healthy, with no nasty side effects, Use those, not these toxic vaccines!

When you are looking for a remedy against a disease, you want something that fights the disease without harming the body. Vaccines are not it.

They neither protect you nor your surroundings from Covid19, a disease which, unlike the effects and many side effects of vaccines listed above, is preventable and treatable.

If you want something to protect you from Covid, make some tea from olive leaf, and drink that as a preventative measure. Oleuropin, which is in Olive leaf, is highly effective against Covid, and does not harm the body.

Wat Flaxseeds and sunflower seeds. Omega 6 destroys Covid. Look here to see how.

And if you get symptoms anyway, use some eucalyptus globulus essential oil. Rub it on your neck, inhale it through steam, You will notice the symptoms disappear in minutes.

Also in contrast with vaccines, these natural remedies are not only healthy , they are also beneficial for conditions as diabetes, heart disease, and any chronic disease, because they build the bodies systems instead of attacking them! That’s also why you feel great while and after using them, because that’s how our bodies react to what is good for them. Pir bodues get sicj from toxins, not from medicine!

If it makes you sick, it’s not medicine, it’s a toxin! We don’t need toxins to heal!

See also : Artsen, Wetenschappers, Juristen, Politici, Politie Agenten, Verple(e)g(st)ers, Militairen, Ambtenaren en andere Deskundigen die zich uitspreken tegen de Covidmaatregelen en voor Fundamentele Mensenrechten

First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2


International Journal of Infectious Diseases

Volume 107, June 2021, Pages 172-175

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221003647


de Volkskrant@volkskrant

26 augustus 2021

Wie corona heeft gehad, is vijf tot zeven keer beter beschermd tegen de deltavariant dan mensen die volledig zijn gevaccineerd met Pfizer, concluderen Israëlische wetenschappers

August 26, 2021

Those who have had corona are five to seven times better protected against the delta variant than people who have been fully vaccinated with Pfizer, Israeli scientists conclude

A new trend since the Covid vaccines: soccer players collapsing and dropping dead on the field.

May be an image of 2 people and text that says 'Nieuws Economie Sport Entertainment Deense voetballer Eriksen zakt elkaar tijdens duel met Finland Besiktas-verdediger Fabrice N'Sakala zakt in elkaar veld Aangepast: 2juni 2021 19:14 TELESPORTREDACTIE Bordeaux-aanvaller Samuel Kalu zakt ineen op het veld 2021 日 Deense Christian tijdens EK- tegen Finland vlak elkaar gezakt. Ex-voetballer Franck Berrier (37) overleden na hartstilstand ©AFP Christian Eriksen tijdens het oetbalz vers Tijdensd wedstrijd Voetballer Samuel Kalu van Girondins Download Log.in voetballer Sign Aad uijn ex-club vrijdag bevestigd. ingang stoppen voetballen door Drama Nederlands voetbalveld, amateurspeler Jens (27) zakt elkaar en overlijdt @BLIKOPENER333 @Kijverder1 dagen Twitter better the app Tweet. Open this witter'

Health Services in Urk withdraw, barely (positive) tests and vaccinations

Health Services in Urk withdraw, barely (positive) tests and vaccinations
With the lowest vaccine action rate in the country and in the meantime hardly any positive corona tests, Urk continues to amaze experts. The GGD has decided to close test and vaccination locations in the fishing village. Is Urk really corona-free or is there more behind these figures? “The infection has circulated fairly extensively in Urk and then it is not unlikely that something of herd immunity will play a role,” says virologist Ab Osterhaus
.

Jasper van Loo, Dominique Voss, Job Oldegbers 10-09-21, 16:51
According to Osterhaus, herd immunity works slightly better than vaccination in the fight against the virus. “If the families in Urk are large, the vaccination rate is low, then there is a good chance that the virus has a free run within the families, but to speak of herd immunity you need to do a lot more research.” Nationally, Urk had by far the most infections in November and December last year, and residents of Urk have hardly tested positive in recent months.

Shedding is a reportable safety event.

FDA documents reveal Covid incidence increases after vaccination.

Wie corona heeft gehad, is vijf tot zeven keer beter beschermd tegen de deltavariant dan mensen die volledig zijn gevaccineerd met Pfizer, concluderen Israëlische wetenschappers.

https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/onderzoek-eerdere-infectie-beschermt-veel-beter-dan-vaccin~b638bfbd/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2F

‘You Sir, Are The One Ignoring Science’: Rand Paul Battles Becerra Over COVID-19 Rules

Sep 30, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MI_Dm3pj3dQ

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) grilled HHS Sec. Xavier Becerra during a Senate Health Committee hearing on Thursday.

Why a Leaky COVID Vaccine Could Be the World’s Next Nightmare | Steve Deace Show

Steve Deace Show  Published September 21, 2021 191,203 Views

Rumble — Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole joins the program to talk about the latest news on the COVID “vaccines.”

https://rumble.com/vmss9j-why-a-leaky-covid-vaccine-could-be-the-worlds-next-nightmare-steve-deace-sh.htmlVacand

Vaccination percentages and cases per country:

Leaky Vaccine.

There is a reason we never had a corona vaccine before becuas ethe virus conatntlmutates, just asAIDS.

There is a mutational drift.

The antibody becomes your enemy.

The vaccine makes an antibody and enhances a disease.

A leaky vaccine does not stop viruses. The vaccine does not give people immunity.

Instead of a good antibody, it becomes a bad one.

The vaccinated have the highest viral loads and are the ones giving the asymptomatic spread.

The vaccinated are higher opportunity viral load holders than the unvaccinated.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 30 : 1–4.doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7 [Epub ahead of print]PMCID: PMC8481107PMID: 34591202

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States

In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/

Funeral Director: Mass Vaccine Deaths, Child Danger, COVID Camps, Genocide Planned


Stew Peters Show
 
Published September 23, 2021

According to funeral director John O Looney says only 15% of people are getting the real j b, 85% of people are getting a placebo, and they become advocates for the vccn.

The old people have been given sedatives. The children are getting heart problems, And they will say it was Covid.

What we are headed to, the unvccntd being rounded up in internment camps and killed.

The government will be going from door to round up the unvaccinated and put them internment camps.

When the children will start dying, parents will rise up, and that will be the excuse to impose Marshall law/

https://rumble.com/vmvgb3-funeral-director-mass-vaccine-deaths-child-danger-covid-camps-genocide-plan.html

In the video in is said The Hippocratic oath has been changed in 2011 , to exclude the words: I will do no harm.

The earliest version ofthe Hippocratic Oath is from 275 AD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath

The only changes to the Hippocrtatic oath I found were in 1964 and in 2017.

https://thedoctorweighsin.com/hippocratic-oath/

In a court hearing, this Dutch doctor Deemans from Horst aan de Maas 1tells about the results of analysing the bodies of people who died after receiving the Covid vaccine.

Strange shapes that have never been seen in the blood before.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is blood-samples-from-dead-people-after-vaccination.png

Pictures of miocarditis, a common ailment after the Covid vaccine. Who ever has these symptoms is dead within ten years.

The composition of the Covid vaccines has been declared a national secret by the health minister in the Netherlands, but the ingredients are known now: graphene oxide nano particals, againstwhich our immune system cannot defend itself, aluminum nano particles, that cause Alzheimer, Mercury, ribosomes, that cumilate in the follicles of girls and make them infertile, monkey kidney particles, foetus particles,

1https://www.facebook.com/ron.fonteine/videos/476064403715972

Another case study of someone who died of Covid 19 after vaccination

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/

Madhya Pradesh: 19-year-old dies within 48 hours of taking COVID-19 vaccine; post-mortem conducted at AIIMS

By: PTI | November 10, 2021 3:13 PM

According to the local health administration, the necessary vaccine protocol had been followed, and the cause of death will be ascertained once the report of the post-mortem conducted by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in Bhopal arrives.

covid 19 vaccine deathThe block medical officer of Ashta Dr Praveer Gupta said Shubham’s health was monitored as per the post-vaccination protocol, and the cause of death will be probed. (Representational image: IE)

A 19-year-old man died within 48 hours of being administered the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine at a village in Madhya Pradesh’s Sehore district, an official said on Wednesday. According to the local health administration, the necessary vaccine protocol had been followed, and the cause of death will be ascertained once the report of the post-mortem conducted by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in Bhopal arrives.

Shubham Parmar was administered the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine at Bhanvra village on the afternoon of November 6, and had returned home after being monitored by the health team for half an hour, it was stated.

The next morning, Shubham started vomiting and was taken to a civil hospital in Ashta and was later referred to Sehore district hospital, where he died on Monday morning, the deceased man’s family said.

The block medical officer of Ashta Dr Praveer Gupta said Shubham’s health was monitored as per the post-vaccination protocol, and the cause of death will be probed.

A post-mortem was conducted by doctors at AIIMS in Bhopal and the exact reason for the death will be known once the report arrives, he said. The deceased man’s father Man Singh said that AIIMS doctors have informed that the report will be submitted in eight days to the concerned police station in the area.

https://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/health/madhya-pradesh-19-year-old-dies-within-48-hours-of-taking-covid-19-vaccine-post-mortem-conducted-at-aiims/2366267/

VAERS confirmed over 6000 additional COVID-19 vaccine death reports

ATLANTA (Precision Vaccinations)

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed an increased number of deaths reported after a COVID-19 vaccination. Between December 14, 2020, through July 19, 2021, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) received 12,313 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.

UPDATE: As of 2:30 PM CT on July 21, 2021, the CDC’s website modified the number of VAERS reports related to COVID-19 vaccination deaths from 12,313 to 6,079, through July 13, 2021. The CDC’s webpage’s Last Update date remains July 19, 2021.

UPDATE #2: As of 6:30 PM CT on July 21, 2021, the CDC’s website stated through July 19, 2021, VAERS had received 6,207 reports of death (0.0018%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. The CDC’s webpage’s Last Update date reflects July 21, 2021.

Since more than 338 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the USA, this data reflects a vaccination-death ratio of 0.0018%.

The CDC’s website says, ‘Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. This is because the U.S. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after a COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause.

Furthermore, a review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines, says the CDC.

Additionally, VAERS had received 1,148  reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 and younger who received a COVID-19 vaccine as of July 19th. The CDC and its partners are investigating these reports to assess whether there is a relationship to COVID-19 vaccination.

Through follow-up, including medical record reviews, the CDC and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have confirmed 674 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis. In both cases, the body’s immune system causes inflammation in response to an infection or some other trigger. 

Most of these heart inflammation cases have been reported to the CDC after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Comirnaty or SpikeVax), particularly in male adolescents and young adults. 

VAERS is the USA’s early warning system that monitors the safety of vaccines after they are Authorized or Licensed for use by the U.S. FDA.

As of July 21, 2021, the FDA had issued three Emergency Use Authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines. However, these experimental vaccines have not been approved by the FDA. 

VAERS is part of the more extensive vaccine safety system, co-managed by the CDC and FDA. VAERS accepts and analyzes reports of possible health problems—also called “adverse events”—after vaccination. 

https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/covid-19-vaccine-related-fatalities-updated

Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021 Jul; 51: 101895.Published online 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101895PMCID: PMC8052499PMID: 33895650

Deaths associated with newly launched SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Comirnaty®)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052499/

Clin Infect Dis

. 2021 Aug 18;ciab707. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab707. Online ahead of print.

Intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine can induce acute myopericarditis in mouse model

Background: Post-vaccination myopericarditis is reported after immunization with COVID-19 mRNA-vaccines. The effect of accidental intravenous injection of this vaccine on the heart is unknown.

Methods: We compared the clinical manifestations, histopathological changes, tissue mRNA expression and serum levels of cytokine/chemokine in Balb/c mice at different time points after intravenous(IV) or intramuscular(IM) vaccine injection with normal saline(NS) control.

Results: Though significant weight loss and higher serum cytokine/chemokine levels were found in IM group at 1 to 2 days post-injection(dpi), only IV group developed histopathological changes of myopericarditis as evidenced by cardiomyocyte degeneration, apoptosis and necrosis with adjacent inflammatory cell infiltration and calcific deposits on visceral pericardium, while evidence of coronary artery or other cardiac pathologies was absent. SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen expression by immunostaining was occasionally found in infiltrating immune cells of the heart or injection site, in cardiomyocytes and intracardiac vascular endothelial cells, but not skeletal myocytes. The histological changes of myopericarditis after the first IV-priming dose persisted for 2 weeks and were markedly aggravated by a second IM- or IV-booster dose. Cardiac tissue mRNA expression of IL-1β, IFN-β, IL-6 and TNF-α increased significantly from 1dpi to 2dpi in IV but not IM group, compatible with presence of myopericarditis in IV group. Ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes was consistently found in IV group. All other organs appeared normal.

Conclusions: This study provided in-vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA-vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; intramuscular; intravenous; mRNA vaccine; mouse model.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34406358/

October 31: WHO does not recommend vaccines for children or vaccine passports

Rabbi

May be an image of 1 person and text that says '"Het vaccin werkt niet goed tegen transmissie, dus het maakt niet uit of je als zorgpersoneel gevaccineerd bent of niet" Door De Wereld Vandaag Professionals letwork 17-11-21 Diederik Gommers "Het heeft helemaal geen zin of je wel of niet gevaccineerd bent"'

Tweet

Nieuwe Tweets bekijken

Gesprek

Radio 1@radio1be“Het vaccin werkt niet goed tegen transmissie. Dus heeft het geen zin of je als zorgpersoneel nu gevaccineerd bent of niet. ” Diederik Gommers Voorzitter Nederlandse Intensivisten, vindt verplichte vaccinatie geen goed idee. #dwv

https://twitter.com/radio1be/status/1460993044749168647

Uitgelicht

Marc Bonten (OMT) verzwijgt connectie met Pfizer en AstraZeneca, experts kritisch

20 april 2021door Jannes van Roermund

GesprekRadio 1@radio1be“Het vaccin werkt niet goed tegen transmissie. Dus heeft het geen zin of je als zorgpersoneel nu gevaccineerd bent of niet. ” Diederik Gommers Voorzitter Nederlandse Intensivisten, vindt verplichte vaccinatie geen goed idee. #dwvv

https://twitter.com/radio1be/status/1460993044749168647

May be an image of 1 person and text that says '"Het vaccin werkt niet goed tegen transmissie, dus het maakt niet uit of je als zorgpersoneel gevaccineerd bent of niet" Door De Wereld Vandaag Professionals letwork 17-11-21 Diederik Gommers "Het heeft helemaal geen zin of je wel of niet gevaccineerd bent"'

November 23, 2021

In Japan, August 13 2021, Ivermectine was allowed without restriction. Two weeks later the Covid 19 cases plummeted.

Japan has a high vaccination percentage, but so does South Korea, and the cases there are soaring.

Persconferentie van Geert Vanden Bossche, viroloog, vaccinoloog.

Geert van den Velde is a virologist and immunologist who worked for Gavi and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.

He says:

-Vaccines destroy children”s natural immunity

-Vaccines have zero effect in gaining herd immunity

-booster vaccines are nonsense, since every contact with viruses means you get an automatic boost. That is because the Covid vaccines are not a medicine, They reprogram your immune system and every contact with viruses will mean you get an overload of antibodies.

-Covid 19 is not a disease for healthy individuals. People who get seriously ill from Covid19 already had compromised immune systems.

-Other health care workers feel the same as he but either don t dare to speak up for fear of the repercussions,or they have toes to the pharmaceutical industry.

His advice: don t compromise your immune system! Don’t take the vaccine! It has zero value, it only harms!

Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants.
Geert Vanden Bossche

Urgent call to WHO: time to switch gears

Cry of distress of Vaccinologist Geert van den bossche

He calls the vaccination a collosal blunder, and calls for a debate amongst his colleagues to reconsider the disastrous path they are taking.

A vaccine that gives 80% protection against a disease that without vaccination you have 90% protection against means that the chance of disease increases with 10%with vaccination.

A vaccine that gives 66% protection against a disease that without vaccination you have 90% protection against means that the chance of disease increases with 24%with vaccination. Is anyone else doing the math?

https://www.rivm.nl/en/covid-19-vaccination/vaccines/efficacy-and-protection

4 cases in Botswana.All 4 vaccinated.

May be an image of text that says '(COVID-19) force 188-1195 Repubico Botswana Telephone: (+267)3631700/2164730 (+267) 3906105 BW C*VID 19 TASK FORCE Media Release November2021 Presidential COVID-19 Task known reported among four of new COVID-19 Monday November 2021. tested RS-COV positive routine routine genomic surveillance contact tracing nformed vaccinated initial exercise. COVID-19, part transmissions, and the variant impact masks, the public advised been severity continue circulating pharmaceutical travels remain effective COVID-19 reports which these being studied made participants. from investigated would These premature o conclusively The public urged take necessary precautions protect themselves from COVID-19a advised from time ime. Ûhkou Dr.KMasupu Coordinator, Presidential COVID-1 Task Force BWGovernment'

Tedros: “Some countries are giving boosters to kill children. Which is not right”.

When the New World Order was created there were 3 billion people on earth. The goal was to reduce the numbers to 1 billion. Now there are 6 billion. the goal is to kill 6 billion and to prevent them from having children.

Covid is peanuts. Young people don t get ill from it.

Schwab boasting about the influence of the World Economic Forum: they have the media, they have governments, the have ngo s, they have social entrepreneurs.

The government is out of control. They are using an experimental vaccine to vaccinate people. This is illegal

Afbeelding
Afbeelding
Afbeelding

Posted 3 hours agoHe just got the booster according to his podcast from 12/11. Since I’ve a couple friends who were in fine health die right after the jabs, it’s not coincidence that it happened to him. Probably a jab related heart attack, internal bleeding or blood clot.

https://www.ibtimes.sg/bob-saget-sudden-death-caused-by-covid-19-booster-shot-wild-theory-surfaces-cause-death-62173

Saget was found unresponsive in his hotel room by staff at the Ritz-Carlton.

Heather Mc Donald boasts about getting all vcns, and then collapses on stage, getting a fractured skull.

Just like Bob Saget

Fall

After bstr

She notices the parallels as well.


Tyler Carditis@TyCardon
Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any. 3 doses with a booster offer reasonable protection against hospitalization and deaths. Less protection against infection.” @US_FDA -Come get your boy!

Miri AF@miri_af·“Dancing on Ice’s Sean Rice dies aged 49 as celebs pay tribute”. These ‘sudden death’ reports are now not just daily, but virtually hourly.liverpoolecho.co.ukDancing on Ice’s Sean Rice dies aged 49 as celebs pay tributeCo-stars and other skating professionals have rushed to convey their sadness at Sean’s passing

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

After receiving his MPH, McCullough was a cardiovascular fellow at William Beaumont Hospital in the Detroit metropolitan area until 1997. He then worked successively at the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute in Detroit until 2000, served as section chief of cardiology of the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Medicine, and returned to William Beaumont Hospital where he worked from 2002 to 2010.[7] He spent the next four years as chief academic and scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System, Detroit, before joining the Baylor University Medical Center in 2014.

McCullough is a founder and current president of the Cardio Renal Society of America[9][12] and co-editor-in-chief of the Society’s journal, Cardiorenal Medicine[13] and editor of the journal Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.[14][15] He has conducted several studies on running and heart disease,[16] and co-described the term Phidippides cardiomyopathy, a heart condition found in some high endurance athletes.[17][18][19] Other research has included the relationship between heart disease and kidney disease[20] and risk factors for heart disease.[21] He is a member of the conservative advocacy group Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.[22][3]

https://rumble.com/vsmzp4-the-official-big-pharma-big-media-covid19-narrative-completely-crumbling-dr.html

Rumble — Dr. Peter McCullough sat down with WND’s Art Moore for an extensive interview covering a range of COVID19 topics.

He recommends iodine, zinc vitamin D, Vitamin C, Quercetin is contained in abundance in apples, honey, raspberries, onions, red grapes, cherries, citrus fruits, and green leafy vegetables [2]. Among vegetables and fruits, quercetin content is highest in onions., and instead of Pepsin, these are better options: kefir, pineapple.

The ElephantI The Room

How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots

This1 is what the Pfizer boss, another veterinarian says of vaccines. The shots everyone was supposed to take are not effective anymore, but the last one is. The NHS says it is only effective for 10 weeks.

Why veterinarians as pharma giants? Is it perhaps because we are not seen as people. Weare seen as cattle, because of the DNA changes they give us with their vaccines. Because of the shrinking and damaging our brains, because of the mixing of our DNA with animal DNA. They see themselves as people and us as a disease the earth must be delivered from in order for them the people, tosurvive.

So who are these people? The art work in the headquarters is very revealing. 2 Occult Egyptian symbols of power and hegemony3.

The Eye of Horus, wedjat eye or udjat eye is a concept and symbol in ancient Egyptian religion that represents well-being, healing, and protection. It derives from the mythical conflict between the idol Horus with his rival Set, in which Set tore out or destroyed one or both of Horus’s eyes and the eye was subsequently healed or returned to Horus with the assistance of another deity, such as Thoth. Horus subsequently offered the eye to his deceased father Osiris, and its revivifying power sustained Osiris in the afterlife. The Eye of Horus was thus equated with funerary offerings, as well as with all the offerings given to deities in temple ritual. It could also represent other concepts, such as the moon, whose waxing and waning was likened to the injury and restoration of the eye.4

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-18.png

The Eye of Horus symbol, a stylized eye with distinctive markings, was believed to have protective magical power and appeared frequently in ancient Egyptian art. It was one of the most common motifs for amulets, remaining in use from the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BC) to the Roman period (30 BC – 641 AD). Pairs of Horus eyes were painted on coffins from the First Intermediate Period (c. 2181–2055 BC) and Middle Kingdom (c. 2055–1650 BC).

It is also a depiction of the pineal gland, that is calcified by fluoridation of the water and toxins of vaccines, so it can’t undo the damage done to the brain and the amygdala by mercury and aluminum and all the other toxins in vaccines.

The other image is Sargon of Akkad, also known a Sargon the Great. He was the first ruler of the Akkadian Empire, known for his conquests of the Sumerian city-states in the 24th to 23rd centuries BC.[2] He is sometimes identified as the first person in recorded history to rule over an empire..

Sargon of Akkad as depicted in Pfizer headquarters in New York.

Bronze head of an Akkadian ruler, discovered in Nineveh in 1931, presumably depicting either Sargon or Sargon’s grandson Naram-Sin (Rijksmuseum van Oudheden)1

1https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bronze_head_of_an_Akkadian_ruler,_discovered_in_Nineveh_in_1931,_presumably_depicting_either_Sargon_or_Sargon%27s_grandson_Naram-Sin_(Rijksmuseum_van_Oudheden).https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bronze_head_of_an_Akkadian_ruler,_discovered_in_Nineveh_in_1931,_presumably_depicting_either_Sargon_or_Sargon%27s_grandson_Naram-Sin_(Rijksmuseum_van_Oudheden).jpg

Sargon of Akkad King of the Universe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to navigationJump to searchKing Sargon II of the Neo-Assyrian Empir  (right) had the full titulature of Great King, Mighty King, King of the Universe, King of Assyria, King of Babylon, King of Sumer and Akkad. Stele housed at the British Museum, London.An inscription of the Akkadian kingRimush on the shell of a rock snail of the genus Murex, reading “Rimush, King of Kish“. By Rimush’s time, “King of Kish” would have meant “King of the Universe”. Now housed in the Louvre, Paris.

King of the Universe also interpreted as King of Everything, King of the TotalityKing of Allor King of the World,was a title of great prestige claiming world domination used by powerful monarchs in ancient Mesopotamia. The title is sometimes applied to God in the Judeo-Christian and Abrahamic tradition.The etymology of the title derives from the ancient Sumerian city of Kish(Sumerian:Akkadian:kiššatu), the original meaning being King of Kish. Although the equation ofšar kiššatimas literally meaning “King of the Universe” was made during the Akkadian period, the title of “King of Kish” is older and was already seen as particularly prestigious, as the city of Kish was seen as having primacy over all other Mesopotamian cities. In Sumerian legend, Kish was the location where the kingship was lowered to from heaven after the legendary Flood.

The first ruler to use the title of King of the Universe was the Akkadian Sargon of Akkad (reigned c. 2334–2284 BC) and it was used in a succession of later empires claiming symbolical descent from Sargon’s Akkadian Empire. The title saw its final usage under the Seleucids, Antiochus I reigned 281–261 BC) being the last known ruler to be referred to as “King of the Universe”.

Horus, Egyptian idol of Kingship and the Sky.

Horus is recorded I  Egyptian hieroglyphs as ḥr.w “Falcon”;.Additional meanings are thought to have been “the distant one” or “one who is above, over5”.

The Leviathan Cross

The Leviathan Cross is sometimes referred to the cross of Satan, which means the “Satans Cross”. Depicted on the bottom is an infinity sign (∞), and above is a double cross (‡). The Double cross symbolizes protection and balance between persons. The infinity sign underlines the constant and infinite nature and most likely symbolizes the eternal universe, this may have been used by Anton LaVey in The Satanic Bible to as a mockery of the cross, to show that humans are their own centrum of balance, and truth. This is what the ideology of Anton LaVey and the followers of the Church of Satan believe, and this is what this symbol represents in this association.

An upside-down crucifix is also a symbol embraced by Satanists. That confuses some people as it is seen as the Petrine Cross or “The Cross of St. Peter” since, according to Origin of Alexandria, Simon Peter was crucified upside down. However, turning a symbol like a cross upside-down is symbolic on it’s own and the interpretation of doing so differs among Catholics and Satanists.

In Alchemy, the Leviathan’s cross is a symbol for sulfur, which is one the three essential elements of nature.

In Asia, its name is the Brimstone Symbol.

The association with the Leviathan makes it a symbol of depth and surfacing. The multiple crossroads of two crosses can be interpreted as a sign of free choice, it can also be seen as a stroke-through “equal-to” (=) to show that every person has their own life.

Sulfur (“Leviathan Cross”) A symbol for the alchemical element Sulfur, (Brimstone) which is spiritually analogous to the human soul. Alchemically, sulfur has the qualities of masculine, hot and dry. Combined with Mercury (feminine, cool and moist), the pair were considered the parents of all metals.

Alchemical drawings often portray Sulfur as the sun. (In some views, sulfur and salt are the parents of Mercury) The symbol of sulfur is often used as an identifying symbol by Satanists, due to sulfur’s historical association with the devil.

This glyph is often referred to incorrectly as the “pontifical cross of Satan” by Christian tract writers, due to its adoption as an emblem of Satanism by Anton LaVey in the 1960s. The emblem has no history as a symbol of Satanism outside of LaVey’s usage, and the attribution is most likely a product of anti-Catholic sentiment, as it is often compared in this context to the Catholic Pontifical Cross. A more common symbol for sulfur is a fire triangle surmounting a cross of earth.

Origins

The Leviathan Cross was created by The Knights Templar. The symbol was then adopted by Anton LaVey, founder of the Church of Satan. Previous associations with the cross and Satanic foundations are unable to be identified.6

On the right Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, to the left Michel de Montagne1, or William Shakespeare2.

1https://youtu.be/-RDGPulBwkI and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_de_Montaigne

2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shakespeare


Louis Pasteur.


Perhaps Field Marshal Viscount Garnet Wolseley7, Queen Victoria\ s most loyal soldier?


Field Marshal Viscount Wolseley 1

1https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garnet_Wolseley,_1st_Viscount_Wolseley#/media/File:Viscount_Garnet_Joseph_Wolseley.jpeg

Field-Marshal Viscount Wolseley, The Story of A Soldier’s Life, Westminster, 1903 1

1https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garnet_Wolseley,_1st_Viscount_Wolseley#/media/File:Garnet_Wolseley.jpg

A picture of a nun in a nurse’s uniform1, and a man with a white beard, much like the emperor in tarot2, pointing a sword at her. A symbol of militarized healthcare? A symbol of the occult conquering tradition and religion, and compassion?

1https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/421790321338341685/

2https://www.alamy.com/major-arcana-tarot-cards-the-emperor-man-with-crown-and-long-white-beard-fur-cape-and-sword-at-the-waist-image242535617.html

All this is beneath large test tubes, like they are gods that take all the knowledge and power of humanity

Check the text: “Breakthroughs that change patients.”

Not “that heal people”, but “that change patients”.

Change patients into what?


If you look at the animal DNA in vaccines, the way they change the brain, the toxins that destroy neurons, the fluor that calcifies the pineal gland and shrink the amygdala, as well as the brain damage done by vaccines, it’s a change into a shadow of our true selves.

They want to be gods, not by becoming better, but by dehumanizing us.

The Pfizer website also says: “We’re in relentless pursuit of scientific breakthroughs and revolutionary medicines that will create a healthier world for everyone1”.

1https://www.pfizer.com/



And the other, “science never rests”.

Should this put as at ease?

we are in the womb, they probably don’t consider us people. They consider us as the disease. A disease that must be eliminated to cure people. That’s them, not us.

Will win a war on our humanity, symbolized by our DNA.

On January 5, 2021, Pfizer introduced a new logo. The strands clearly symbolize DNA, but make a 666 pattern when you include the P as an upside down mirrored 6.

They seem to feel like they are gods saving the earth ridding it from us, the disease. When they say they want to cure people more than disease wants to exist, they mean curing themselves from us.

So that’s why real remedies are not implemented and hidden from us, even if they win Nobel Prizes. that’s why someone like Rhoads works at chemical warfare, at the OSS, and then sets up a cancer research center, where he gets his inspirationfor making chemo therapy drugs from mustard gas.

That alone should worry you. Substances that heal should inspire medicine, not substances that kill.

But we are seen as the enemy, and that’s why toxins are brought as medicine. Our elimination is seen as the necessary step to heal the earth.

On the inside, there is a 4,833 square ft glass mosaic.

The artist description: “These are all HIV cells budding from healthy cells, and as you walk from the lobby into the main hall, you move from HIV to terminal cancer’.”

The Tesla of a Pfizer emplotee parked outside of the Pfizer headquarters.

JAB-5714 – Strong’s Concordance says 57=Mourning9, 14=To be willing10, and 5714=Timely11. Could mean it’s time to be willing to go into mourning over people getting the JAB.

Jab fest 5714 Old Concord Rd, 5714 Old Concord Road, Charlotte, United States

https://happeningnext.com/event/jab-fest-eid4snskku2vx1

Gravitas: Revealed: How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots.12

Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna making $1,000 profit every second while world’s poorest countries remain largely unvaccinated.13

But Companies Keep the Patents

Despite the tremendous taxpayer investments, typically the drug companies fully own the patents. That means that companies can decide how and where the vaccines get manufactured and how much they cost. As the CureVac contract explains it, the company “shall be entitled to exclusively exploit any such” property rights.

This has been a matter of contention for months. A coalition of countries, led by India and South Africa, have petitioned the World Trade Organization to waive intellectual property rights so generic drug makers can begin producing the vaccines. The World Health Organization has endorsed the idea, but it is all but doomed by opposition from the United States and Europe, whose drug makers say patents, and the profits that flow from them, are the lifeblood of innovation.

“Governments are creating artificial scarcity,” said Zain Rizvi of the watchdog group Public Citizen. “When the public funds knowledge that is required to end a pandemic, it shouldn’t be kept a secret14.”

By insisting that their pricing remains confidential, the drug makers have the upper hand over government negotiators who do not know what other countries are paying15.

While governments accepted that provision, leaks and some official reports show some of the disparities. The European Commission paid $2.19 for every dose of the vaccine developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca, while South Africa paid more than twice as much, $5.25, according to media reports.

Drug companies did not respond to requests to view their unredacted contracts or explain why secrecy was necessary. A spokeswoman for Moderna pointed only to a regulatory document that said the contract “contains terms and conditions that are customary16.”

That is why it caused such a stir last month when a Belgian official mistakenly revealed a price list, which showed that United States taxpayers were paying $19.50 per dose for the Pfizer vaccine, while Europeans paid $14.70.

Dag Inge Ulstein, Norway’s minister of international development, said countries and international organizations must do more to make contracts public. He also called on countries to share vaccine technology and said rich governments should donate vaccines to poor countries early — even while still vaccinating their own citizens,as Norway plans to do.17

“There must be transparency related to the agreements on procurements,” he said in an interview. To that end, he shared with The New York Times his country’s purchase agreement with Covax. That organization has refused to make public its deals — either with the drug makers or with the countries it is selling to.18

Covax contracts with countries assume a cost of $10.55 per dose but warn that the final cost could be higher after including an “access/speed premium,” which Covax said is used to help companies rush their vaccines to market.

Donations and Resales Are Restricted

Public health advocates have called on wealthy countries — which have all but cornered the market on the early doses — to donate or sell vaccines to poor countries. But contracts may restrict buyers’ ability to export doses, which could depress drug company sales.19

The CureVac contract, for example, prohibits European countries from reselling, exporting or donating doses — including to Covax — without permission from the company. Some contracts in the United States have similar restrictions.20

WASHINGTON, Nov. 17 (Xinhua)2021 21 U.S. multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporation Pfizer has been bullying governments around the world in COVID-19 vaccine contracts, said a recent report.

“The contracts offer a rare glimpse into the power one pharmaceutical corporation has gained to silence governments, throttle supply, shift risk and maximize profits in the worst public health crisis in a century,” said the report published in late October by Washington-based non-profit, progressive consumer rights advocacy group and think tank Public Citizen.

Citing six examples, the report pointed out that Pfizer not only reserves the right to silence governments, tightly controls vaccine donations, and uses anyone’s intellectual property it pleases largely without consequence, but also bypasses domestic legal processes by empowering private arbitrators to decide disputes in secret, enables itself to go after state assets, and enjoys unilateral authority for key decisions.

“Pfizer’s dominance over sovereign countries poses fundamental challenges to the pandemic response,” the report noted, adding the corporation’s demands have been slowing purchase agreements and even pushing back the delivery schedule of vaccines.

“Public health should come first,” it said, urging governments worldwide to push back22. Enditem

An extreme demand’23

Pfizer asked for an additional indemnity from civil cases, meaning that the company would not be held liable for rare adverse effects or for its own acts of negligence, fraud or malice. This includes those linked to company practices — say, if Pfizer sent the wrong vaccine or made errors during manufacturing.

“Some liability protection is warranted, but certainly not for fraud, gross negligence, mismanagement, failure to follow good manufacturing practices,” said Gostin. “Companies have no right to ask for indemnity for these things.”

Mark Eccleston-Turner, a lecturer in global health law at Keele University in England, said Pfizer and other manufacturers have received government funding to research and develop the vaccines and are now pushing the potential costs of adverse effects back on to governments, including those in low- and middle-income countries. (Pfizer’s partner, BioNTech, was given $445 million by the German government to develop a vaccine and the U.S. government agreed in July to preorder 100 million doses for nearly $2 billion, before the vaccine had even entered Phase 3 trials. Pfizer expects to make sales of $15 billion worth of vaccines in 2021.)

In Eccleston-Turner’s opinion, it looks like Pfizer “is trying to eke out as much profit and minimize its risk at every juncture with this vaccine development then this vaccine rollout. Now, the vaccine development has been heavily subsidized already. So there’s very minimal risk for the manufacturer involved there.”

Covid-19 vaccination rates follow the money in states with the biggest wealth gaps, analysis shows24

The Bureau spoke to officials from two countries, who all described how meetings with Pfizer began promisingly but quickly turned sour, and reviewed a report by the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

The Argentinian Ministry of Health began negotiating with the company in June 2020 and President Alberto Fernández held a meeting with the company’s general manager for Argentina the following month. During subsequent meetings Pfizer asked to be indemnified against the cost of any future civil claims, said an official from the president’s office. Although this had never been done before, the country’s Congress passed a new law in October allowing for it. However, Pfizer was not happy with the phrasing of the legislation, according to the official, who declined to be identified because the negotiations were confidential. The government believed Pfizer should be liable for any acts of negligence or malice. Pfizer, said the official, disagreed.

The government did offer to amend the existing law to make it clear “negligence” meant problems in the distribution and delivery of the vaccines. But Pfizer was still not satisfied. It asked the government to amend the legislation through a new decree; Fernández refused.

“Argentina could compensate for the vaccine’s adverse effects, but not if Pfizer makes a mistake,” said the official, who has detailed knowledge of the negotiations. “For example, what would happen if Pfizer unintentionally interrupted the vaccine’s cold chain [of -70 Celsius during transport and storage] … and a citizen wants to sue them? It would not be fair for Argentina to pay for a Pfizer error.”

The official said talks soon became tense and complicated: “Instead of giving in on some points, Pfizer demanded more and more.” In addition to the changes sought in the new law, it asked Argentina to take out international insurance to pay for potential future cases against the company (countries were also asked by vaccine makers and the WHO to do this during the H1N1 outbreak).

In late December, Pfizer made another unexpected request: that the government put up sovereign assets — which might include federal bank reserves, embassy buildings, or military bases — as collateral.

“We offered to pay millions of doses in advance, we accepted this international insurance, but the last request was unusual: Pfizer demanded that the sovereign assets of Argentina also be part of the legal support,” the official said. “It was an extreme demand that I had only heard when the foreign debt had to be negotiated, but both in that case and in this one, we rejected it immediately.”

The failed negotiations mean Argentinian citizens, unlike those in neighboring countries, do not have access to Pfizer’s vaccine, leaving them with Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine, AstraZeneca’s vaccine, and those delivered through COVAX. The government is also negotiating to acquire vaccines from Moderna, Sinopharm, and CanSino.

“Pfizer misbehaved with Argentina,” said Ginés González Garcia, Argentina’s former minister of health. “Its intolerance with us was tremendous25.”

Bristol CEO Giovanni Caforio on new drug launches and acquisitions in 202226

Good cop, bad cop’

The same demands were made of Brazil’s Ministry of Health, according to a ministry statement. Pfizer asked to be indemnified against all civil claims and asked the ministry to put up sovereign assets as collateral, as well as create a guarantee fund with money deposited in a foreign bank account. In January, the ministry refused these terms,describing the clauses as “abusive27.”

An official from the Latin American country that cannot be named described talks unfolding similarly. This person said the government began negotiating with Pfizer in July, before the vaccine was approved. There was a perception that Pfizer’s negotiators had a “good cop, bad cop” routine, with the “bad cop” pressing the government to buy more doses.

“[At that time] there was not a single drug or vaccine in the world with this kind of technology that had been shown to be safe and effective. … You had this lady putting pressure saying: ‘Buy more, you’re going to kill people, people are going to die because of you,’” the official said.

Negotiations became fraught when the company asked for additional indemnity, for civil cases alleging Pfizer’s acts of negligence, fraud, or malice. The government had never awarded any kind of indemnity before and did not want to waive liability, but Pfizer said this was non-negotiable. Negotiations continued and eventually a deal was signed that included the additional indemnity provisions, but after a delay of three months.

As Pfizer has only 2 billion doses to sell across the world this year — apparently on a first-come, first-served basis — the official is angry about a delay that likely pushed the country further back in the queue.

One of the reasons the government wanted Pfizer’s vaccines was because the company said they could be delivered quickly. Yet in the contract, Pfizer wanted to reserve the right to modify the schedule. There was no room for negotiation. “It was take it or leave it,” said the official.

The official added: “Five years in the future when these confidentiality agreements are over, you will learn what really happened in these negotiations28.”

Based in the U.K., the Bureau of Investigative Journalism is an independent, not-for-profit organization. This story was produced by its Global Health desk29.

Pfizer has been accused of bullying governments in Latin America over coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine negotiations, a recent investigative article revealed.30

The accusations involve the company’s requests that some countries establish sovereign assets as a guarantee against the costs associated with future legal suits made on behalf of citizens who experience an adverse event after the shot.

The story published in The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, states that demands made by the global pharmaceutical giant Pfizer resulted in a three-month delay in a vaccine deal for one country. In the case of Argentina and Brazil, the countries made no national deals with the company.

These slowdowns in deals may be leading to holdups in people receiving much-needed COVID-19 vaccines, particularly in areas with high levels of viral spread. Some experts believe this could lead to a delay in ending this pandemic, as analyses in the U.K. have found that treatment with the Pfizer vaccine have led to an approximate 70% drop in infectionsjust after the first shot.

Argentina and officials from other countries in Latin America claim that negotiators on behalf of Pfizer demanded additional indemnity against civil claims citizens might file if they report experiencing vaccine-related adverse effects. Sovereign assets are being requested by the company, including military bases and embassy buildings, as a guarantee against potential legal costs.

According to the investigative article, an official from an unnamed country has described Pfizer’s demands as “high-level bullying” and noted that the country’s government perceived it was being “held to ransom” before it could receive a supply of COVID-19 vaccines.

Legal experts are reportedly raising concerns that the company’s demands are quickly accumulating to an abuse of power.

Despite this prevailing perception amongst these government officials, most government organizations across the world are offering Pfizer (and other COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers) indemnity.

In these cases, the government would be responsible for paying compensation to a citizen who experiences an adverse effect following vaccination, regardless of whether the citizen files a claim against the manufacturer itself. This is generally the case for most vaccines that are released during a pandemic; the AS03-adjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccine, for instance, was recently linked to an increased risk of narcolepsy.

“Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be using their power to limit life-saving vaccines in low- and middle-income countries,” according to a statement made by Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization’s Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law and published in The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. “[This] seems to be exactly what they’re doing.”

Since the beginning, Pfizer has been collaborating with over 100 countries as well as supranational organizations on COVID-19 vaccine deals. The company has reached supply agreements with a total of nine Latin American and Caribbean countries, including Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru and Uruguay. Detailed terms of these supply deals have not yet been fully disclosed.

“Some liability protection is warranted, but certainly not for fraud, gross negligence, mismanagement, failure to follow good manufacturing practices,” said Gostin in The Bureau article. “Companies have no right to ask for indemnity for these things.”

Because of the failed negotiations, many Argentinian citizens will not have access to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Instead, these citizens will have the option to receive Russia’s Sputnik Vvaccine, AstraZeneca’s vaccine and vaccines delivered via Covax. Currently, the Argentina government is in talks with Moderna, Sinopharm and CanSino to acquire their COVID-19 shots.31

So Pfizer is bullying countries in South America. What about North America and Europe?

According to thisarticle in the New York Times. January 28, 2021, the same story of secrecy, crazy profits, total control and no liability:

Governments Sign Secret Vaccine Deals. Here’s What They Hide.

Multibillion-dollar contracts give drug makers liability shields, patent ownership and leeway on delivery dates and pricing — and promises that much of it will not be made public.

.

Credit… Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times

Matt Apuzzo
Selam Gebrekidan

By Matt Apuzzo and Selam Gebrekidan

Published Jan. 28, 2021Updated Feb. 24, 2021

BRUSSELS — When members of the European Parliament sat down this month to read the first publicly available contract for purchasing coronavirus vaccines, they noticed something missing. Actually, a lot missing.

The price per dose? Redacted. The rollout schedule? Redacted. The amount of money being paid up front? Redacted.

And that contract, between the German pharmaceutical company CureVac and the European Union, is considered one of the world’s most transparent.

Governments have poured billions of dollars into helping drug companies develop vaccines and are spending billions more to buy doses. But the details of those deals largely remain secret, with governments and public health organizations acquiescing to drug company demands for secrecy.

Just weeks into the vaccination campaign, that secrecy is already making accountability difficult. The drug companies Pfizer and AstraZeneca recently announced that they would miss their European delivery targets, causing widespread concern as dangerous virus variants spread. But the terms of their contracts remain closely guarded secrets, making it difficult to question company or government officials about either blame or recourse.

Available documents, however, suggest that drug companies demanded and received flexible delivery schedules, patent protection and immunity from liability if anything goes wrong. In some instances, countries are prohibited from donating or reselling doses, a ban that could hamper efforts to get vaccines to poor countries.

Governments are cutting at least three types of vaccine deals: Some are buying directly from pharmaceutical companies. Others are buying through regional bodies like the European Union or the African Union. Many will turn to the nonprofit Covax program, an alliance of more than 190 countries, which is buying from the drug makers with an eye toward making vaccines available worldwide, especially to poor countries free or at reduced cost. Some governments have signed deals with manufacturers and Covax alike.

The United States has secured 400 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, enough for 200 million people, and is close to arranging 200 million additional doses by summer, with options to buy up to 500 million more. It also has advance purchase agreements for more than 1 billion doses from four other companies whose inoculations do not yet have U.S. regulatory approval.

The European Commission, the European Union’s executive branch negotiating on behalf of its 27 member states, has nearly 2.3 billion doses under contract and is negotiating for about 300 million more, according to data collected by UNICEF and Airfinity, a science analytics company.

Covax says it has agreements for just over 2 billion vaccine doses although it, too, is keeping its contracts secret. Only about a dozen of the 92 countries that qualify for vaccine subsidies under the alliance have managed to secure separate deals with individual companies, for a combined 500 million doses.

Despite the secrecy, government and regulatory documents, public statements, interviews and the occasional slip-up have revealed some key details about the vaccine deals. Here is what we learned.

Waiting in line to receive Moderna’s vaccine in San Diego. The company said its vaccination program was fully funded by the federal government.Ariana Drehsler for The New York Times

Governments Helped Create Vaccines

Vaccine development is a risky venture. Companies rarely invest in manufacturing until they’re sure their vaccines are effective and can win government approval. That’s part of why it typically takes so long to develop and roll them out.

To speed up that process, governments — primarily the United States and Europe — and nonprofit groups like the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, or CEPI, absorbed some or all of that risk.

The United States, for example, committed up to $1.6 billion to help the Maryland-based company Novavax develop its coronavirus vaccine, according to regulatory filings. CEPI kicked in up to about $400 million in grants and no-interest loans.

Other companies have received even more help.

The Massachusetts biotech company Moderna not only used government-developed technology as the foundation of its vaccine, it also received about $1 billion in government grants to develop the drug. In August, the government then placed an initial order for the vaccine for $1.5 billion. The company has said that the project was paid for entirely by the federal government.

These types of arrangements were designed to help companies jump-start manufacturing and cover costs such as clinical testing.

But Companies Keep the Patents

Despite the tremendous taxpayer investments, typically the drug companies fully own the patents. That means that companies can decide how and where the vaccines get manufactured and how much they cost. As the CureVac contract explains it, the company “shall be entitled to exclusively exploit any such” property rights.

This has been a matter of contention for months. A coalition of countries, led by India and South Africa, have petitioned the World Trade Organization to waive intellectual property rights so generic drug makers can begin producing the vaccines. The World Health Organization has endorsed the idea, but it is all but doomed by opposition from the United States and Europe, whose drug makers say patents, and the profits that flow from them, are the lifeblood of innovation.

“Governments are creating artificial scarcity,” said Zain Rizvi of the watchdog group Public Citizen. “When the public funds knowledge that is required to end a pandemic, it shouldn’t be kept a secret.”

Image

Administering the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in France earlier this month. The European Union is paying much less than the United States for each dose of the shot.Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times

Prices Will Vary

One of the key terms of the vaccine contracts — the price per dose — is frequently redacted in the public versions of government contracts. The companies consider this a trade secret. Some drug companies have included clauses in their supply contracts that allow them to suspend deliveries if countries reveal the price.

By insisting that their pricing remains confidential, the drug makers have the upper hand over government negotiators who do not know what other countries are paying.

While governments accepted that provision, leaks and some official reports show some of the disparities. The European Commission paid $2.19 for every dose of the vaccine developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca, while South Africa paid more than twice as much, $5.25, according to media reports.

Drug companies did not respond to requests to view their unredacted contracts or explain why secrecy was necessary. A spokeswoman for Moderna pointed only to a regulatory document that said the contract “contains terms and conditions that are customary.”

That is why it caused such a stir last month when a Belgian official mistakenly revealed a price list, which showed that United States taxpayers were paying $19.50 per dose for the Pfizer vaccine, while Europeans paid $14.70.

Dag Inge Ulstein, Norway’s minister of international development, said countries and international organizations must do more to make contracts public. He also called on countries to share vaccine technology and said rich governments should donate vaccines to poor countries early — even while still vaccinating their own citizens, as Norway plans to do.

“There must be transparency related to the agreements on procurements,” he said in an interview. To that end, he shared with The New York Times his country’s purchase agreement with Covax. That organization has refused to make public its deals — either with the drug makers or with the countries it is selling to.

Covax contracts with countries assume a cost of $10.55 per dose but warn that the final cost could be higher after including an “access/speed premium,” which Covax said is used to help companies rush their vaccines to market.

Donations and Resales Are Restricted

Public health advocates have called on wealthy countries — which have all but cornered the market on the early doses — to donate or sell vaccines to poor countries. But contracts may restrict buyers’ ability to export doses, which could depress drug company sales.

The CureVac contract, for example, prohibits European countries from reselling, exporting or donating doses — including to Covax — without permission from the company. Some contracts in the United States have similar restrictions.

A spokesman for the European Commission has said the companies included that provision to guarantee that, wherever their drugs were used, they were covered by the same legal protections.

And governments are trying to find other ways to restrict exports.

On Tuesday, Germany lobbied the European Commission to allow its member states to block exports of vaccines to countries outside of the bloc after the stuttering start of vaccine distribution in Europe.

Packing boxes of Covishield, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine, at an assembly line in Pune, India.Atul Loke for The New York Times

Vaccines Arrive When They Arrive

Delivery times are considered proprietary information, so there are no public benchmarks to measure a company against.

Nowhere is that clearer than in the European Union’s fight with AstraZeneca over the company’s announcement that it would not deliver the expected number of doses in the first quarter of this year. European officials say they received specific, contractual assurances for such deliveries. The company says it promised only to make its best efforts to hit those targets.

European officials, who initially agreed to keep the contract secret, have now asked the company to make it public. Unless that happens, there’s no way to assess who is responsible.

But there is no question that the drug makers have built themselves plenty of wiggle room for such an ambitious, complicated rollout. The CureVac contract says that the delivery dates (which are all redacted) should be considered estimates. “No product or only reduced volumes of the product may be available at the estimated delivery dates,” the contract reads. Similar provisions exist in other contracts.

Nearly every vaccine maker has similarly told investors that they might not hit their targets. “We may not be able to create or scale up manufacturing capacity on a timely basis,” Pfizer warned in a corporate filing last August.

That uncertainty has frustrated health officials. When Pfizer recently told Italy that it was temporarily cutting deliveries by 29 percent, the government said it was considering taking the company to court. That lawsuit, if it materializes, could make public some details of the European Union’s contract with Pfizer, which remains entirely secret.

“At one point they promised more vaccines or faster vaccines,” said Steven Van Gucht, the Belgian government’s top virologist. “And in the end they couldn’t deliver.”

Some Governments Are Profiting

Early in the pandemic, the European Investment Bank, the lending arm of the European Union, provided a $100 million loan to the German company BioNTech, which partnered with Pfizer in producing a vaccine.

In addition to the interest on the loan, the European bank will receive up to $25 million in vaccine profits, according to a redacted version of the contract that BioNTech filed with securities regulators.

The bank said profit-sharing arrangements reflect the risk involved in early financing. Mr. Rizvi, of Public Citizen, argued that it puts governments on the same side as the drug makers and reduces any incentive to make drugs cheap and widely available.

Companies Get Liability Protection

In the United States, drug companies are shielded from nearly all liability if their vaccines don’t work or cause serious side effects. The government covered Covid-19 drug makers under the PREP Act, a 2005 law intended to speed up access to medicine during health emergencies.

That means that people cannot sue the companies, even in cases of negligence or recklessness. The only exceptions are cases of proven, “willful misconduct.”

Drug companies are seeking similar liability waivers in negotiations with other countries. European negotiators have balked at such requests. Covax also insists that countries accept all liability as part of its contracts.

The CureVac-E.U. contract does shield the company from significant liability, but with exceptions. Those exceptions are redacted.32

Monika Pronczuk contributed reporting.

The Fight to Beat a Pandemic

Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker

Waste, Negligence and Cronyism: Inside Britain’s Pandemic Spending

Matt Apuzzo is a two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter based in Brussels. He has covered law enforcement and security matters for more than a decade and is the co-author of the book “Enemies Within.” @mattapuzzo

Selam Gebrekidan is an investigative reporter for The New York Times based in London. She previously was a data and enterprise reporter for Reuters where she wrote about migration to Europe and the war in Yemen, among other stories. She has also covered U.S. oil markets. 33

And so how are these vaccines doing?

Experts weigh in after suing FDA for access to Pfizer trial data34

21 December 2021|COVID-19

By Maryanne Demasi, PhD35

In Dec 2020, the US drug regulator (FDA) granted emergency use authorisation to Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine with limited data from phase III trials.

Amid the urgency of the pandemic, the review of the trial data was conducted faster than usual. What would normally take an average of 10 months to review, only took the FDA 108 days.

Immediately, it raised doubts about the speed with which the agency made its decision.

Fast forward to Aug 2021 and the FDA granted full approval to Pfizer’s (Comirnaty) mRNA vaccine, without releasing the full data set to the public for independent scrutiny.

Experts became concerned that all the publicly available information on a fully licensed product, was limited to journal articles, press releases, and assessments by drug regulators – all of which are subject to conflicts of interest and bias.

Scientists rally for transparency

A group of over 80 public health officers and medical researchers formed an alliance to obtain and disseminate the data upon which the FDA made its decision to license Pfizer’s vaccine.

The non-profit group, called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Fort Worth, Texas in September 2021. US-based physician, Dr Aaron Kheriaty, is one of the members leading the charge.

“A group of us were concerned about the trial design, the shortened duration of the clinical trial, and the patchwork system that was in place for the post-marketing surveillance of adverse events,” said Dr Kheriaty.

For example, Pfizer was allowed to terminate its control group after only two months.

“The placebo group was basically eliminated because the vaccine was offered to everyone who had the placebo, so they failed to maintain a control group,” said Dr Kheriaty.

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit stipulated that, under federal law, the data and information in the documents filed with the FDA should be available for public disclosure unless extraordinary circumstances are shown. 

The purpose was to ensure government transparency and accountability.

Prof Tom Jefferson is another member of PHMPT and of the WHO’s Covid-19 Infection Prevention and Control Research Working Group. He says the importance of an independent review of the scientific data cannot be overstated. 

“Censorship and lack of transparency have always been the enemies of progress. In the case of Covid-19 vaccines, the importance of transparency in heightened by the mass administration to healthy populations and their unknown long-term effects,” said Prof Jefferson.

“Given the insufficient and hurried testing and the culture of secrecy, it is arguable whether any informed consent is valid, prior to making public all of the documents the FDA has in its possession,” he added.

Pfizer’s vaccine has been the subject of vigorous debate, including claims of under-reporting adverse events, falsification of data, and a lack of efficacy.

FDA asks to delay document release

While the FDA says it’s committed to transparency, the agency proposes to drip feed Pfizer’s documents to the public over several decades.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers representing the FDA asked the federal judge to allow them 75 years to process the FOIA request, which takes the end date for the final release of documents to 2096.

They argued that releasing 451,000 pages of documents immediately would be too burdensome because the agency was insufficiently staffed and that it would only be able to release just 500 pages per month to allow for redactions of exempt material such as trade secrets.

“The idea that the FDA with 18,000 employees and $6.5 billion in funding cannot produce the documents more expeditiously is absurd,” says Aaron Siri, US attorney acting on behalf of PHMPT, the plaintiff.

“It is dystopian for the government to give Pfizer billions, mandate Americans to take its product, prohibit Americans from suing for harm, but yet refuse to let Americans see the data underlying its licensure.”

“The FDA has not disputed that it should produce these documents” said Mr Siri, “rather, it proposes doing so at a rate so slow that the documents will not be fully produced until almost all of the scientists, attorneys, and most of the Americans that received Pfizer’s product, will have died of old age.”

In rebuttal, the FDA said it is unreasonable to expect them to meet the demands because it only has 10 employees processing FOIA requests. Mr Siri says that’s no excuse.

“There are numerous instances of other agencies, when dealing with a production that is eligible for expedited processing, that have transferred staff, or hired more staff, in order to promptly comply with their statutory obligations,” says Mr Siri. 

Indeed, in the DOJ’s = response to the court, it conceded that since 2018, the FDA has responded to federal subpoenas, with quick turnarounds for productions that had required hundreds of thousands of pages each.

What did the initial release of documents show?

A batch of Pfizer’s documents has already been released by the FDA.

Dr Kheriaty said there was a lot of hype in the media over the meaning of the documents, but there is still a lot of missing information and therefore, is cautious not to over-interpret the data so far.

For example, there were claims that the documents showed 1223 people had died from the vaccine, within the first 90 days of the vaccine rollout, but the reality is more nuanced.

“Basically, we just have raw numbers. If you look at that document, they redacted information about how many Pfizer doses had been shipped out. So, if we don’t know how many total doses were given, we cannot establish what percentage of people who got the vaccine, may have had those adverse events,” explained Dr Kheriaty.

That said, the number of ‘reported’ deaths received by Pfizer in the early stages of the vaccine rollout did strike Dr Kheriaty as ‘high.’

“It’s a huge spike there that should be taken as a significant safety signal”, said Dr Kheriaty. 

“If you look at vaccine adverse events that have been reported for the Covid vaccines compared to the flu vaccine over the last 20 years, we’ve seen orders of magnitude larger numbers of adverse events, including deaths, reported.” (see graph)

Further, he pointed to the appendix in one of the Pfizer documents (page 30) that listed nine pages of reported adverse events.

While causation cannot be inferred, Dr Kheriaty suggested that there are some concerning signals in the list.

“I’m seeing a lot of neurological issues and I’m seeing a lot of autoimmune issues, “he said.

“If you look at the fact sheet given to people receiving the Pfizer vaccine, it lists something like 21 potential side effects from the trial, most of them benign. In contrast, the adverse events reported in those first 90 days of post surveillance are very concerning.”

Until the entirety of the data are released, a definitive assessment cannot be made.

Prof Jefferson shares a similar view.

The Pfizer documents submitted to the FDA are likely to follow an international standard structure – called the Common Technical Document (CTD), which consist of five modules.

“Partial, incomplete, or batch release of parts of the CTD impede assessment of the application in a coherent way and may lead to errors in the interpretation of its content,” says Prof Jefferson.

Releasing the modules out of sequence – which is what the FDA is doing now – will adulterate the analysis.

“Missing even a single dataset could corrupt any analysis by scientists seeking to conduct a proper review of Pfizer’s data, that is why it should all be released immediately,” he said.

What now?

While the FDA has already released a batch of Pfizer’s documents, Mr Siri says the judge is yet to decide on how the FDA should proceed.

“There has been no decision issued in this case yet and any documents produced to date have been produced by the FDA apparently in the hopes of softening any decision the Court may render,” he says.

A final ruling by the judge on the time frame that the FDA must release its documents could be determined within weeks unless the hearing is adjourned.36


Washington Post , October 19, 2021: In secret vaccine contracts with governments, Pfizer took hard line in push for profit, report says37.

A report released Tuesday by Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group that gained access to a number of leaked, unredacted Pfizer contracts, sheds light on how the company uses that power to “shift risk and maximize profits,” the organization argues.

Public citizen, OCTOBER 19, 2021

Pfizer’s Power

In February, Pfizer was accused of “bullying” governments in COVID vaccine negotiations in a groundbreaking story by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism38. A government official at the time noted, “Five years in the future when these confidentiality agreements are over you will learn what really happened in these negotiations39.”

Public Citizen has identified several unredacted Pfizer contracts that describe the outcome of these negotiations. The contracts offer a rare glimpse into the power one pharmaceutical corporation has gained to silence governments, throttle supply, shift risk and maximize profits in the worst public health crisis in a century. PC describes six examples from around the world below40.

TABLE 1: SELECT PFIZER CONTRACTS REVIEWED[4]
PurchaserDateTypeDosesPrice Per DoseTotal Cost
AlbaniaDraft41Draft Definitive Agreement500,000$12$6 million
Brazil03/15/2142Definitive Agreement100 million$10$1 billion
Colombia02/02/2143Definitive Agreement10 million$12$120 million
Chile12/01/2044Definitive Agreement (Redacted)10 millionRedactedRedacted
Dominican Republic10/29/2045Binding Term Sheet468 million$12$96 million
European Commission11/20/2047Custom Advance Purchase Agreement200 million$18.6048$3.7 billion
Peru09/17/2049Binding Term Sheet10 million$12$120 million
United States07/21/2050Custom Advance Purchase Agreement (Redacted)100 million$19.5$1.95 billion
United Kingdom10/12/2051Custom Advance Purchase Agreement (Redacted)30 millionRedactedRedacted

Pfizer’s demands have generated outrage around the world, slowing purchase agreements and even pushing back the delivery schedule of vaccines.52If similar terms are included as a condition to receive doses, they may threaten President Biden’s commitment to donate 1 billion vaccine doses.53

High-income countries have enabled Pfizer’s power through a favorable system of international intellectual property protection.54High-income countries have an obligation to rein in that monopoly power. The Biden administration, for example, can call on Pfizer to renegotiate existing commitments and pursue a fairer approach in the future. The administration can further rectify the power imbalance by sharing the vaccine recipe, under the Defense Production Act, to allow multiple producers to expand vaccine supplies55. It can also work to rapidly secure a broad waiver of intellectual property rules (TRIPS waiver) at the World Trade Organization56. A wartime response against the virus demands nothing less.

1. Pfizer Reserves the Right to Silence Governments.

In January, the Brazilian government complained that Pfizer was insisting on contractual terms in negotiations that were “unfair and abusive57.”The government pointed to five terms that it found problematic, ranging from a sovereign immunity waiver on public assets to a lack of penalties for Pfizer if deliveries were late. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism soon published a scathing story on Pfizer’s vaccine negotiations58.

Less than two months later, the Brazilian government accepted a contract with Pfizer that contains most of the same terms that the government once deemed unfair59.Brazil waived sovereign immunity; imposed no penalties on Pfizer for late deliveries; agreed to resolve disputes under a secret private arbitration under the laws of New York; and broadly indemnified Pfizer for civil claims60.

The contract also contains an additional term not included in other Latin American agreements61 reviewed by Public Citizen: The Brazilian government is prohibited from making “any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement” or commenting on its relationship with Pfizer without the prior written consent of the company62. Pfizer gained the power to silence Brazil.

Brazil is not alone. A similar nondisclosure provision is contained in the Pfizer contract with the European Commission and the U.S. government63.In those cases, however, the obligation applies to both parties.

For example, neither Pfizer nor the U.S. government can make “any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of this Agreement, the transactions contemplated by it, or the relationship between the Pfizer and the Government hereunder, without the prior written consent of the other64.”The contract contains some exceptions for disclosures required by law. It is not clear from the public record whether Pfizer has elected to prohibit the U.S. from making any statements thus far. The E.C. cannot include in any announcement or disclosure the price per dose, the Q4 2020 volumes, or information that would be material to Pfizer without the consent of Pfizer65.

2. Pfizer Controls Donations.

Pfizer tightly controls supply66.The Brazilian government, for example, is restricted from accepting Pfizer vaccine donations from other countries or buying Pfizer vaccines from others without Pfizer’s permission67.The Brazilian government also is restricted from donating, distributing, exporting, or otherwise transporting the vaccine outside Brazil without Pfizer’s permission68.

The consequences of noncompliance can be severe. If Brazil were to accept donated doses without Pfizer’s permission, it would be considered an “uncurable material breach” of their agreement, allowing Pfizer to immediately terminate the agreement69.Upon termination, Brazil would be required to pay the full price for any remaining contracted doses70.

3.Pfizer Secured an “IP Waiver” for Itself.

The CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, has emerged as a strident defender of intellectual property in the pandemic. He called a voluntary World Health Organization effort to share intellectual property to bolster vaccine production “nonsense” and “dangerous71.”He said President Biden’s decision to back the TRIPS waiver on intellectual property was “so wrong72.”“IP, which is the blood of the private sector, is what brought a solution to this pandemic and it is not a barrier right now,” claims Bourla73.

But, in several contracts, Pfizer seems to recognize the risk posed by intellectual property to vaccine development, manufacturing, and sale. The contracts shift responsibility for any intellectual property infringement that Pfizer might commit to the government purchasers. As a result, under the contract, Pfizer can use anyone’s intellectual property it pleases—largely without consequence.

At least four countries are required “to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer” from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, damages, costs, and expenses related to vaccine intellectual property74.For example, if another vaccine maker sued Pfizer for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract requires the Colombian government to foot the bill. At Pfizer’s request, Colombia is required to defend the company (i.e., take control of legal proceedings75.)Pfizer also explicitly says that it does not guarantee that its product does not violate third-party IP, or that it needs additional licenses.

Pfizer takes no responsibility in these contracts for its potential infringement of intellectual property. In a sense, Pfizer has secured an IP waiver for itself. But internationally, Pfizer is fighting similar efforts to waive IP barriers for all manufacturers76.

4.Private Arbitrators, not Public Courts, Decide Disputes in Secret.

What happens if the United Kingdom cannot resolve a contractual dispute with Pfizer? A secret panel of three private arbitrators—not a U.K court—is empowered under the contract to make the final decision77.The arbitration is conducted under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Both parties are required to keep everything secret:

The Parties agree to keep confidential the existence of the arbitration, the arbitral proceedings, the submissions made by the Parties and the decisions made by the arbitral tribunal, including its awards, except as required by Law and to the extent not already in the public domain78.

The Albania draft contract and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, and Peru agreements require the governments to go further, with contractual disputes subject to ICC arbitration applying New York law79.

While ICC arbitration involving states is not uncommon, disputes involving high-income countries and/or pharmaceuticals appear to be relatively rare80.

In 2012, 80% of state disputes were from Sub-Saharan Africa, Central and West Asia, and Central and Eastern Europe81.The most common state cases were about the construction and operation of facilities82.

In 2020, 34 states were involved in ICC arbitrations83.The nature of state disputes is not clear, but only between 5 to 7% of all new ICC cases, including those solely between private parties, were related to health and pharmaceuticals84.

Private arbitration reflects an imbalance of power. It allows pharmaceutical corporations like Pfizer to bypass domestic legal processes. This consolidates corporate power and undermines the rule of law.

5.Pfizer Can Go After State Assets.

The decisions reached by the secret arbitral panels described above can be enforced in national courts85. The doctrine of sovereign immunity can sometimes, however, protect states from corporations seeking to enforce and execute arbitration awards.

Pfizer required Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, and Peru to waive sovereign immunity86. In the case of Brazil, Chile and Colombia, for example, the government “expressly and irrevocably waives any right of immunity which either it or its assets may have or acquire in the future” to enforce any arbitration award (emphasis added)87. For Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and the Dominican Republic, this includes “immunity against precautionary seizure of any of its assets88.”

Arbitral award enforcement presents complex questions of law that depend on the physical location and type of state asset89. But the contract allows Pfizer to request that courts use state assets as a guarantee that Pfizer will be paid an arbitral award and/or use the assets to compensate Pfizer if the government does not pay90.

For example, in U.S. courts, these assets could include foreign bank accounts, foreign investments, and foreign commercial property, including the assets of state-owned enterprises like airlines and oil companies91.

6.Pfizer Calls the Shots on Key Decisions.

What happens if there are vaccine supply shortages? In the Albania draft contract and the Brazil and Colombia agreement, Pfizer will decide adjustments to the delivery schedule based on principles the corporation will decide. Albania, Brazil, and Colombia “shall be deemed to agree to any revision92.”

Some governments have pushed back on Pfizer’s unilateral authority for other decisions. In South Africa, Pfizer wanted to have the “sole discretion to determine additional terms and guarantees for us to fulfill the indemnity obligations93.”South Africa deemed this “too risky” and a “potential risk to [their] assets and fiscus94.”After delays, Pfizer reportedly conceded to remove this “problematic term95.”

But others have not been as successful. As a condition to entering into the agreement, the Colombian government is required to “demonstrate, in a manner satisfactory to Suppliers, that Suppliers and their affiliates will have adequate protection, as determined in Suppliers’ sole discretion” (emphasis added) from liability claims96.[60] Colombia is required to certify to Pfizer the value of the contingent obligations (i.e., potential future liability), and to start appropriating funds to cover the contingent obligations, according to a contribution program97.

Pfizer’s ability to control key decisions reflects the power imbalance in vaccine negotiations. Under the vast majority of contracts, Pfizer’s interests come first.

A Better Way

Pfizer’s dominance over sovereign countries poses fundamental challenges to the pandemic response. Governments can push back. The U.S. government, in particular, can exercise the leverage it holds over Pfizer to require a better approach. Empowering multiple manufacturers to produce the vaccine via technology transfer and a TRIPS waiver can rein in Pfizer’s power. Public health should come first.98

The Pfizer documents,

Dr. John Campbell, March 9. 2022

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, Pfizer / FDA FOI https://phmpt.org Request, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/IR0546-FDA-Pfizer-Approval-FINAL.pdf Against FDA https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/001-Complaint-101021.pdf The court order https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/056-ORDER-GRANTING-IN-PART-THE-MOTION-TO-MODIFY-THE-PRODUCTION-SCHEDULE-AND-ADDOPTS-THE-JOINT-STATUS-REPORT-MODIFIED-AGREED-PRODUCTION-SCHEDULE.pdf List of downloadable documents https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/ 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021 Adverse event reports 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021 Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1,913), France (1,506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756) the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries. Fatal, 1,223 Since Dec. 11, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has been available under EUA https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine (Approval, 21st August 2021) Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. While millions of people have already safely received COVID-19 vaccines, we recognize that for some, the FDA approval of a vaccine may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated. Today’s milestone puts us one step closer to altering the course of this pandemic in the U.S. System Organ Classes (SOCs) that contained the greatest number (≥2%) of events, in the overall dataset, were General disorders and administration site conditions (51,335 AEs), Nervous system disorders (25,957), Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (17,283), Gastrointestinal disorders (14,096), Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (8,476), Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (8,848), Infections and infestations (4,610), Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (5,590), and Investigations (3,693). Cardiovascular AESIs Number of cases: 1403 (3.3% of the total PM dataset), of which 241 are medically confirmed and 1162 are non-medically confirmed; 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2. Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research “Our scientific and medical experts conducted an incredibly thorough and thoughtful evaluation of this vaccine. We evaluated scientific data and information included in hundreds of thousands of pages, conducted our own analyses of Comirnaty’s safety and effectiveness, and performed a detailed assessment of the manufacturing processes, including inspections of the manufacturing facilities,” “….. the public is counting on safe and effective vaccines. The public and medical community can be confident that although we approved this vaccine expeditiously, it was fully in keeping with our existing high standards for vaccines in the U.S.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-releases-pfizer-vaccine-documents/?itm_term=home Austria https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/03/09/world/covid-19-mandates-cases-vaccine Karoline Edtstadler the law, passed in January, in force since early February, not proportionate, relatively mild symptoms experienced by most people who contract Omicron

Pfizer Documents reveal potential side effects, March 11, 2022,

These are the 1291 “side effects” reported from the Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine. Please see articles below for more information. I am not a medical professional and make no claims regarding these effects, just supplying information that appears to be credible to me at this time. #pfizer #vaccine #vaxpassport #fda https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil… https://health-infobase.canada.ca/cov… https://www.reuters.com/legal/governm… https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-…

Pfizer Covid vaccine has 1,291 side effects reveals official documents

This release of documents follows U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman’s decision on January 6 to deny the request from the FDA to suppress the data for the next 75 years, which the agency claimed was necessary, in part, because of its “limited resources.”

By

 The Rio Times

 –

March 7, 2022

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – In a 55,000-page set of documents released on Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is for the first time allowing the public to access data Pfizer submitted to FDA from its clinical trials in support of a Covid-19 vaccine license.

This follows U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman’s decision on January 6 to deny the request from the FDA to suppress the data for the next 75 years, which the agency claimed was necessary, in part, because of its “limited resources.”

Read also: Check out our coverage on curated alternative narratives

When Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were aware of almost 158,000 adverse events. This really does not paint them in a favorable light. And now, a 38-page report features an appendix with a list that says Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has 1,291 side effects.

Food and Drug, Pfizer Covid vaccine has 1,291 side effects reveals official documents

The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto’s encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.

“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland.

“At least now we know why the FDA and Pfizer wanted to keep this data under wraps for 75 years. These findings should put an immediate end to the Pfizer Covid vaccines. The potential for serious harm is clear, and those injured by the vaccines are prohibited from suing Pfizer for damages….”

Download the documents here.

https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/pfizer-covid-vaccine-has-1291-side-effects-reveals-official-documents/

https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

‘Paramount importance’: Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs

By Jenna Greene

Vial and sryinge are seen in front of displayed Pfizer and Biontech logo

A vial and sryinge are seen in front of a displayed Pfizer and Biontech logo.REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

  • Companies
  • Law firms
  • Related documents

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

Jan 7 -2022 Score one for transparency.

A federal judge in Texas on Thursday ordered the Food and Drug Administration to make public the data it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, imposing a dramatically accelerated schedule that should result in the release of all information within about eight months.

That’s roughly 75 years and four months faster than the FDA said it could take to complete a Freedom of Information Act request by a group of doctors and scientists seeking an estimated 450,000 pages of material about the vaccine.

The court “concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance,” wrote U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, who was appointed to the bench by former President Donald Trump in 2019.

The FDA didn’t dispute it had an obligation to make the information public but argued that its short-staffed FOIA office only had the bandwidth to review and release 500 pages a month.

While Pittman recognized “the ‘unduly burdensome’ challenges that this FOIA request may present to the FDA,” in his four-page order, he resoundingly rejected the agency’s suggested schedule.

Rather than producing 500 pages a month — the FDA’s proposed timeline — he ordered the agency to turn over 55,000 a month. That means all the Pfizer vaccine data should be public by the end of the summer rather than, say, the year 2097.

Even if the FDA may not see it this way, I think Pittman did the agency — and the country — a big favor by expediting the document production.

I’ve been chronicling this fight since November and have heard from of readers who said they felt something was suspicious, even nefarious, in the FDA’s proposed slo-mo timeline. Making the information public as soon as possible may help assuage the concerns of vaccine skeptics and convince them the product is safe.

Pittman in his order nodded to this as well, including a quote from the late senator John McCain, who said that excessive administrative secrecy “feeds conspiracy theories and reduces the public’s confidence in the government.”

Still, the FDA is likely to be hard-pressed to process 55,000 pages a month.

The office that reviews FOIA requests has just 10 employees, according to a declaration filed with the court by Suzann Burk, who heads the FDA’s Division of Disclosure and Oversight Management. Burk said it takes eight minutes a page for a worker “to perform a careful line-by-line, word-by-word review of all responsive records before producing them in response to a FOIA request.”

At that rate, the 10 employees would have to work non-stop 24 hours a day, seven days a week to produce the 55,000 pages a month (and would still fall a bit short).

But as lawyers for the plaintiffs Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency pointed out in court papers, the FDA as of 2020 had 18,062 employees. Surely some can be dispatched to pitch in at the FOIA office.

Aaron Siri of Siri & Glimstad, who represents the plaintiffs, in an email said the decision “came down on the side of transparency and accountability.”

His clients — a group that includes more than 200 doctors, scientists, professors and public health professionals, including some who have publicly questioned the efficacy of lockdown policies, mask mandates and the vaccine itself — have pledged to publish all the information they receive from the FDA on their website.

The Justice Department, which represented the FDA in the litigation, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday evening. Pfizer, not a party to the suit, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Pittman in his order made clear that the FOIA request, even if burdensome, has to be a priority for the FDA.

Quoting from remarks made during the hearing before him on December 14, he wrote that “there may not be a ‘more important issue at the Food and Drug Administration . . . than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated,” and assuring the public that the vaccine was not “‘rush[ed] on behalf of the United States.'”

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/paramount-importance-judge-orders-fda-hasten-release-pfizer-vaccine-docs-2022-01-07/

FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/

Free Newsletter Sign UpLoginBROWSEAdvanced SearchGo

Health Law & Business

Photographer: Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images

Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto

Jan. 18, 2022, 10:00 AMListen

A group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. Plaintiff’s attorney Aaron Siri, who is representing the group, explains the fight that led a federal court to order expedited release of documents the agency claimed it would take decades to process.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

That is not a typo. The FDA wanted court approval to have up to 75 years to publicly disclose this information.

In its attempts to build public support for Covid-19 vaccinations, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency,” and reaffirmed its “commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

With that promise in mind, after the vaccine’s licensure in August 2020, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, a group of highly credentialed scientists submitted a FOIA request to the FDA for the data submitted by Pfizer. The scientists explained that, until all the data is produced, a proper review cannot be conducted because missing even a single data set could throw off any analysis.

In response, the FDA produced nothing. Therefore, in September 2021, the scientists, represented by their attorneys at Siri & Glimstad, sued the FDA demanding it produce this data by March 2022.

The agency originally estimated it would need to produce 329,000 pages, and asked the court for permission to produce just 500 pages per month, which would have taken 55 years. In its final brief to the Court, the FDA admitted that the total page count was at least 451,000, but still sought permission to produce just 500 pages per month. Meaning that it could have taken 75 years, when most Americans alive today would be dead, to fully publicly disclose this information.

On Jan. 6, a federal court in the Northern District of Texas ordered the expedited release. As of Jan. 12, the FDA hasn’t indicated it intends to appeal.

Scientists Requested Data After FDA Licensing

The FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine on Aug. 23, 2021, just 108 days after Pfizer started producing the records to the agency. During that period, the FDA asserts it conducted an intense, robust, and thorough analysis of those documents to assure the public that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective.

Yet, when asked to share those documents with the public, the FDA claimed it needed over 20,000 days. The FDA’s production schedule clashed with its promise of transparency.

The purpose of FOIA is government transparency. When it comes to the Pfizer vaccine, the need for transparency is unprecedented. A majority of Americans are now mandated to receive a Covid-19 vaccine under penalty of losing a job, or worse.

This has never been done before. Typically adult vaccine mandates have been limited; even the seminal U.S. Supreme Court vaccine mandate decision, Jacobson v. Massachusettsonly involved a state-imposed $5 penalty, and school vaccine mandates have historically had liberal religious or personal belief exemption policies.

Even more problematic is that Americans, if injured, cannot sue Pfizer. There is virtually no other product where a consumer is prohibited from suing the company that manufactures, markets, and profits from the product.

Decoupling a company’s profit interest from its interest in safety creates a moral hazard and departs from centuries of product liability doctrine. Thus, it is extraordinary that Americans must take this product under penalty of expulsion from work, school, the military and civil life, but they cannot sue Pfizer for any resulting injuries.

The federal government created this unprecedented situation. It granted the immunity, licensed the product, and aggressively sought mandates. This situation therefore warrants unprecedented transparency.

As then-presidential candidate Joe Biden told the American people, “You’ve got to make all of it [the vaccine data] available to other experts across the nation so they can look and see.” He repeated that need to share the data numerous times. So did senators and representatives on both sides of the aisle.

FDA Claimed It Can’t Comply, Judge Orders Compliance

The FDA apparently disagreed. During a hearing on Dec. 14, 2021, its counsel steadfastly maintained that the court should not require the agency to produce more than 500 pages per month, harping on the FDA’s purported limited resources, its need to redact personal information, and duty to protect Pfizer’s trade secret interests, all the while ignoring the interests of the American people.

The FDA’s excuses were incredible. The FDA has more than 18,000 employees and a budget of over $6.5 billion. It would be laughable if any multibillion-dollar company came before a court and claimed poverty to escape making a document production, but that was the FDA’s position.

U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman, Northern District of Texas, expressed dismay at the FDA’s proposed rate of production. He found the duration requested by the FDA unreasonable, comparing it to the actions of totalitarian nations. As such, the judge on Jan. 6 ordered the FDA to produce at least 55,000 pages per month.

In his ruling, the judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities. He quoted James Madison as saying a “popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy” and John F. Kennedy as explaining that a “nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

America has some of the greatest institutions of learning the world has ever known. We need the scientific community, both inside and outside the government, to address the serious ongoing issues with the vaccine program, including waning immunity, variants evading vaccines, and that vaccinated individuals can still transmit the virus.

The FDA’s attempt to close the door and lock out independent scientists from the data necessary to address these issues was irresponsible.

Transparent, Independent Review Is Needed

The failure of the government’s closed-door approach is exemplified by the fact that the FDA did not send a representative to the court hearing because, as the government attorney explained, the FDA’s Covid-19 protocols would not permit it.

Meaning, despite a reported vaccination rate of over 96% across federal health agencies back in November 2021, and the FDA’s claim that the vaccines are “effective,” Covid-19 is still disrupting everyday life. This brings into stark focus the need to open the door and involve independent scientists.

As Pittman recognized, America needs transparency and independent scientists to review this data—not in 75 years, but now.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law and Bloomberg Tax, or its owners.

Write for Us: Author Guidelines

Author Information

Aaron Siri is the managing partner of Siri & Glimstad LLP, and has extensive experience in a wide range of complex civil litigation matters, with a focus on civil rights involving mandated medical procedures, class actions, and high-stakes disputes. Twitter @aaronsirisg.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto

Sources

1https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/10/pfizer-ceo-says-two-covid-vaccine-doses-arent-enough-for-omicron.html

2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tjEikTVv_o&t=38s

3Scroll down to find the artworkand Pfizerheadquarters, New York https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2020/09/16/covidiocy/

4https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_Horus

5https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horus

6https://symbolism.fandom.com/wiki/The_Leviathan_Cross

7Field-Marshal Viscount Wolseley, The Story of A Soldier’s Life, Westminster, 1903 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garnet_Wolseley,_1st_Viscount_Wolseley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garnet_Wolseley,_1st_Viscount_Wolseley#/media/File:Garnet_Wolseley.jpg and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garnet_Wolseley,_1st_Viscount_Wolseley#/media/File:Viscount_Garnet_Joseph_Wolseley.jpeg  Queen Victoria’s most faithful soldier. It was Wolseley’s good fortune not merely to be an excellent soldier but also to share to the full his Sovereign’s faith in Britain’s Imperial destiny. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/garnet-wolseley-soldier-empire

8https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_von_Waldersee

9Abel, Hebrew for Mourning https://biblehub.com/hebrew/57.htm

10Abah, Hebrew for to be willing https://biblehub.com/hebrew/14.htm

11Iddo , Hebrew for timely https://biblehub.com/hebrew/5714.htm

12https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYIJxoh7gqw

13https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/pfizer-biontech-and-moderna-making-1000-profit-every-second-while-worlds-poorest

14https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

15https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

16https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

17https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

18https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

19https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

20https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

21http://www.news.cn/english/2021-11/18/c_1310318481.htm

22http://www.news.cn/english/2021-11/18/c_1310318481.htm

23https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

24https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

25https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

26https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

27https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

28https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

29https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/pfizer-plays-hardball-in-covid19-vaccine-negotiations-in-latin-america/

30https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/got-a-story/journalists

31https://www.biospace.com/article/pfizer-accused-of-holding-some-countries-to-ransom-over-covid-19-negotiations

32to obscure or remove (text) from a document prior to publication or release https://knoxfocus.com/mean-redact-something/

33https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/world/europe/vaccine-secret-contracts-prices.html

34https://maryannedemasi.com/publications/f/experts-weigh-in-after-suing-fda-for-access-to-pfizer-trial-data

35MARYANNE DEMASI, PHD

is an investigative journalist and TV producer/presenter with over 12 years experience in TV production. Previously, she worked for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC TV) and Channel 7 in Australia.

Ahe is a former medical scientist, I completed a PhD in Rheumatology at the University of Adelaide and also worked as a minister advisor/speechwriter for the South Australian Science Minister.

She was awarded the National Press Club of Australia prize in 2008, 2009 & 2011 for ‘Excellence in Health Journalism’.

36https://maryannedemasi.com/publications/f/experts-weigh-in-after-suing-fda-for-access-to-pfizer-trial-data

37https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/10/19/secret-vaccine-contracts-with-governments-pfizer-took-hard-line-push-profit-report-says/

38Madlen Davies, Rosa Furneaux , Iván Ruiz, Jill Langlois, ‘Held to Ransom’: Pfizer Demands Governments Gamble with State Assets to Secure Vaccine Deal, Bureau of Investigative Journalism (Feb 23 2021),https://tinyurl.com/t2z39a63.

39Madlen Davies, Rosa Furneaux , Iván Ruiz, Jill Langlois, ‘Held to Ransom’: Pfizer Demands Governments Gamble with State Assets to Secure Vaccine Deal, Bureau of Investigative Journalism (Feb 23 2021), https://tinyurl.com/t2z39a63.

40While there are similarities across the contracts, each agreement is unique. The specific examples outlined below should not read as reflective ofother contracts. In several cases, governments signed additional deals with Pfizer. PC reviewed select contracts that were publicly available.

41Albania-Pfizer Contract Draft, (“Albania Draft Contract”), (Jan. 6 2021) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20616251-albanian-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-contract. The final provisions of the agreement may have differed from this draft. However, given similarities between this draft and the other reviewed agreements, we believe the modifications, if any, were likely not substantial. The contract was first leaked on Twitter, and then shared widely in the press.

42Brazil-Pfizer Contract (“Brazil Contract”), (March 15 2021) https://aurores.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Brazil-Pfizer.pdf. The contract was leaked online and later covered by The Guardian in August. See e.g., https://tinyurl.com/yupsz2j4.

43Colombia-Pfizer Contract (“Colombia Contract”), (Feb. 2 2021), https://www.nodal.am/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/DOCUMENTO.pdf. The contract was leaked in the Colombian Media in August. https://tinyurl.com/4vswvrz4. It is currently referenced in the UNICEF Vaccine Market Dashboard.

44Chile-Pfizer Contract (“Chile Contract”) (Dec. 1 2021), https://www.chiletransparente.cl/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Acuerdo-de-fabricacion-y-suministro-PFIZER.pdf. A Chilean transparency initiative published a redacted version of the contract.

45Dominican Republic-Pfizer Contract (“D.R. Contract”) (Oct. 29 2020),https://www.keionline.org/35485. Knowledge Ecology International obtained the contract through a freedom of information law request.

46The text was subject to the approval of the Dominican Republican National Congress, which reportedly approved the text with no objections. Pfizer and AstraZeneca, The Game of Contracts with Small Print, Dominican Today, https://tinyurl.com/yhasn7um.

47European Commission-Pfizer Contract (“E.C. Contract”) (Nov. 20 2020), https://tinyurl.com/3bph89wy. The Italian public broadcaster RAI published the EC Contract in April.

4815.5 EUR.

49Peru-Pfizer Contract (“Peru Contract”) (Sept. 17 2020),https://tinyurl.com/y2ap74xz. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism published the contract.

50 United States-Pfizer Contract (“U.S. Contract”) (July 21 2020), https://tinyurl.com/4k5j7d5u. The contract is available on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.

51United Kingdom-Pfizer Contract (“U.K Contract”) (Oct. 10 2020), https://tinyurl.com/ym4pk3tw. This likely is the definitive agreement that follows on from initial agreement announced in July. The contract is available on the U.K government website.

52Madlen Davies, Rosa Furneaux, Pfizer backs down over “unreasonable terms” in South Africa vaccine deal (April 19 2021). https://tinyurl.com/tnys9u2c. (“He described how Pfizer’s late demand caused delays in the discussions, which in turn put back the anticipated vaccine delivery dates.”). See also the impasse in Philippines. Philippines receives side letter from Pfizer; WHO sees resolution of ‘impasse’ soon (Feb 23. 2021),  https://tinyurl.com/3fs8z3cb (“The delivery of 117,000 Pfizer-BioNTech doses, initially expected in mid-February, was delayed by concerns on indemnification.”).

53White House, FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces Historic Vaccine Donation: Half a Billion Pfizer Vaccines to the World’s Lowest-Income Nations (June 10 2021), https://tinyurl.com/he8bm9tk

54Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite, Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? (2007) (tracing the role of Pfizer in advocating for a system of international patent protection).

55Zain Rizvi, Jishian Ravinthiran, Amy Kapczynski,  Sharing The Knowledge: How President Joe Biden Can Use The Defense Production Act To End The Pandemic Worldwide, Health Affairs Blog (August 6, 2021), https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20210804.101816/full/

56Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

57Madlen Davies , Rosa Furneaux , Iván Ruiz , Jill Langlois, ‘Held to Ransom’: Pfizer Demands Governments Gamble with State Assets to Secure Vaccine Deal, Bureau of Investigative Journalism (Feb 23 2021), https://tinyurl.com/t2z39a63.

58Madlen Davies , Rosa Furneaux , Iván Ruiz , Jill Langlois, ‘Held to Ransom’: Pfizer Demands Governments Gamble with State Assets to Secure Vaccine Deal, Bureau of Investigative Journalism (Feb 23 2021), https://tinyurl.com/t2z39a63.

59One clause that appears to have changed is the number of doses supplied by Pfizer. It is also not clear whether Brazil developed a foreign bank guarantee fund.

60Brazil Contract, footnote 6, Article 9.4 (Waiver of Sovereign Immunity), pg. 45, Article 2.6 (Delivery Delays), pg. 34, Article 9.4 (Waiver of Sovereign Immunity) pg. 45, Article 3.1 (Indemnification by Purchaser), pg. 43, respectively.

61The other Latin American contracts reviewed contain a more limited nondisclosure obligation. For example, under the Colombia contract, neither Pfizer nor Colombia can “use the name, trade name, service marks, trademarks, trade dress or logos of the other Party in publicity releases, advertising or any other publication, without the other Party’s prior written consent in each instance.” This does not appear to prohibit the government from talking about the contract, as long as it is not a “publicity release, advertising, or any other publication.”

62Brazil Contract, Article 12.3 (Publicity), pg. 32 (“Purchaser shall not make, or permit any person to make, any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of this Agreement, the wider transactions contemplated by it, or the relationship between the Parties (except as required by Law, and subject to the protections set forth in Section 10.1), without the prior written consent of Pfizer (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed)”.

63 E.C. Contract, footnote 11, Article II.10 (Announcements and Publicity), pg. 36.

64U.S. Contract, footnote 14, Article 11.11 (Announcements), pg. 25.

65E.C. Contract, footnote 11, Article II.10 (Announcements and Publicity), pg. 36.

66 For example, Colombia is also required to distribute the vaccine only in its territory. Colombia Contract, footnote 7, Article 4.6 (Diversion Issues), pg. 23 (“All Product delivered to Purchaser shall be: (a) stored securely by Purchaser; and (b) distributed by Purchaser only in Colombia in a secure manner appropriate to the transportation route and destination, in each case (a) and (b) to guard against and deter theft, diversion, tampering, substitution (with, for example, counterfeits) resale or export out of Colombia, and to protect and preserve the integrity and efficacy of the Product.”).

67 Brazil Contract, footnote 6, Article 2.1 (f) (Agreement to Supply), pg. 31 (“Purchaser, including any related Person or any agents of Purchaser, covenants to exclusively obtain all of its supply of any Vaccine of Pfizer, BioNTech or their respective Affiliates intended for the prevention of the human disease COVID-19 (including the Product) either (i) directly from Pfizer or from Pfizer through the COVAX Facility, or (ii) from a Third Party, whether by donation, resale or otherwise, only if Purchaser has obtained Pfizer’s prior written consent.  Any breach of this Section 2.1(f) shall be deemed an uncurable material breach of this Agreement, and Pfizer may immediately terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.2.  For clarity, nothing in this Section 2.1(f) shall prevent Purchaser from purchasing competing vaccine products of any Third Party.”).

68Brazil Contract, footnote 6, Article 4.6 (Diversion Issues), pg. 38 (“Purchaser shall not directly or indirectly resell, donate, distribute, export or otherwise transport the Product outside the Territory without Pfizer’s prior written consent.”).

69 Brazil Contract, footnote 6, Article 2.1 (f) (Agreement to Supply), pg. 31.

70Brazil Contract, footnote 6, Article 6.2 (Termination for Cause), pg. 27 (“In the event that this Agreement is terminated by Pfizer under this Section 6.2, Purchaser shall pay within thirty (30) days of the date of notice of termination of this Agreement the full Price for all Contracted Doses less amounts already paid to Pfizer as of such date.”)

71Ed Silverman, Pharma leaders shoot down WHO voluntary pool for patent rights on Covid-19 products, STAT (May 28 2020), https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2020/05/28/who-voluntary-pool-patents-pfizer/

72U.S. Backs Waiver of Intellectual Property Protection for Covid-19 Vaccines, Wall Street Journal (May 6 2021), https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-backs-waiver-of-intellectual-property-protection-for-covid-19-vaccines-11620243518

73WTO delays decision on waiver on COVID-19 drug, vaccine rights (Dec. 10 2020), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-wto-idUSKBN28K2WL

74This extends to all civil claims, including adverse effects. That has been detailed elsewhere: Madlen Davies, Rosa Furneaux , Iván Ruiz , Jill Langlois, ‘Held to Ransom’: Pfizer Demands Governments Gamble with State Assets to Secure Vaccine Deal, Bureau of Investigative Journalism (Feb 23 2021), https://tinyurl.com/t2z39a63.

75Colombia Contract, footnote 7, Article 8.2 (Assumption of Defense), pg. 31.

76 Pfizer signed the letter opposing the TRIPS waiver sent to President Biden in March, for example. PhRMA Letter Opposing TRIPS Waiver to President Biden (March 5 2021), https://patentdocs.typepad.com/files/2021-03-05-phrma-letter.pdf

77U.K. Contract, footnote 15, Article 23 (Dispute Resolution) pg. 36. (“The arbitration award shall be final and binding on the Parties, and the parties undertake to carry out any award without delay. Judgment upon the award may be entered by any court having jurisdiction of the award or having jurisdiction over the relevant party or its assets.”)

78U.K. Contract, footnote 15, Article 23 (Dispute Resolution) pg. 36. (“The arbitration award shall be final and binding on the Parties, and the parties undertake to carry out any award without delay. Judgment upon the award may be entered by any court having jurisdiction of the award or having jurisdiction over the relevant party or its assets.”)

79Article on Governing Law. Albania Draft Contract pg. 34, Brazil Contract pg. 45, Chile Contract pg. 29, Colombia Contract pg. 43, DR Contract pg. 17, Peru Contract pg. 9.

80Analysis is limited by a lack of transparency.

81Arbitration Involving States and State Entities under the ICC Rules of Arbitration – Report of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR (2012), https://iccwbo.org/publication/arbitration-involving-states-state-entities-icc-rules-arbitration-report-icc-commission-arbitration-adr/, pg. 4.

82Arbitration Involving States and State Entities under the ICC Rules of Arbitration – Report of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR (2012), https://iccwbo.org/publication/arbitration-involving-states-state-entities-icc-rules-arbitration-report-icc-commission-arbitration-adr/, pg. 4.

83194 state-owned entities were also involved. ICC Dispute Resolution 2020 Statistics,https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-dispute-resolution-statistics-2020/ pg. 11. See also, an analogous mechanism known as investor-state dispute resolution, which is based on international law as opposed to contract: Global Trade Watch, Table of Foreign Investor-State Cases and Claims Under NAFTA and Other U.S. “Trade Deals” (Jan. 15 2021),https://www.citizen.org/article/table-of-foreign-investor-state-cases-and-claims-under-nafta-and-other-u-s-trade-deals/

84ICC Dispute Resolution 2020 Statistics, https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-dispute-resolution-statistics-2020/ pg. 17.

85 United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958) (“Each Contracting State shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them in accordance with the rules of procedure of the territory where the award is relied upon, under the conditions laid down in the following articles.”)

86Article on Waiver of Sovereign Immunity. The language differs in some of the contracts. Brazil Contract, pg. 45, Chile Contract pg. 24, Colombia Contract pg. 36, DR Contract pg. 17, Peru Contract pg.  9.

87Article on Waiver of Sovereign Immunity. The language differs in some of the contracts. Brazil Contract, pg. 45, Chile Contract pg. 24, Colombia Contract pg. 36, DR Contract pg. 17, Peru Contract pg. 9.

88Article on Waiver of Sovereign Immunity. The language differs in some of the contracts. Brazil Contract, pg. 45, Chile Contract pg. 24, Colombia Contract pg. 36, DR Contract pg. 17, Peru Contract pg. 9.

89 In the U.S., the governing statute is the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). 28 U.S.C § 1602. Sovereign property used for commercial activity can be used to execute a judgment based on an arbitral award if the state has waived immunity. Property belonging to an instrumentality of a foreign state engaged in commercial activity can also be used. 28 U.S.C § 1610. However, certain kinds of foreign sovereign property are absolutely immune from award attachment and execution. This includes property belonging to the foreign central bank or monetary authority and property used for military purposes. 28 U.S.C §1611.

90Under FSIA, this is known as “attachment prior to the entry of judgment” and can be done if the state waives this kind of immunity and “the purpose of the attachment is to secure satisfaction of a judgment that has been or may ultimately be entered against the foreign state.” 28 U.S.C § 1610

91Other jurisdictions may handle these questions differently, potentially exposing other types of sovereign assets. These assets may also be vulnerable in settlement negotiations.

92Albania Draft Contract, pg. 14. Brazil Contract, pg. 22. Colombia Contract, pg. 15.

93Pfizer Backs Down Over Unreasonable Terms in South Africa Vaccine Deal (April 19 2021), https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2021-04-19/pfizer-backs-down-over-asset-seizing-clause-in-south-africa-vaccine-deal.

94Pfizer Backs Down Over Unreasonable Terms in South Africa Vaccine Deal (April 19 2021), https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2021-04-19/pfizer-backs-down-over-asset-seizing-clause-in-south-africa-vaccine-deal.

95Pfizer Backs Down Over Unreasonable Terms in South Africa Vaccine Deal (April 19 2021), https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2021-04-19/pfizer-backs-down-over-asset-seizing-clause-in-south-africa-vaccine-deal.

96 Colombia Contract, footnote 7, Article 8.5 (Privileges and Immunities), pg. 32. This includes but is not limited to funding state contractual contingency funds.

97 Colombia Contract, footnote 7, Article 8.5 (Privileges and Immunities), pg. 32. This includes but is not limited to funding state contractual contingency funds.

98https://www.citizen.org/article/pfizers-power/

Medscape

@Medscape

Antibodies derived from natural COVID infection are more abundant and at least 10x more potent than immunity generated by vaccination alone. That’s not something we should ignore, scientists say. http://ms.spr.ly/6010wnz9o

May be an image of text

7:33 / 16:50

Medscape

@Medscape, February 28, 2022

Antibodies derived from natural COVID infection are more abundant and at least 10x more potent than immunity generated by vaccination alone. That’s not something we should ignore, scientists say. http://ms.spr.ly/6010wnz9o

The Pfizer documents,

Dr. John Campbell, March 9. 2022

Pfizer Documents reveal potential side effects, March 11, 2022,

‘Data is power’: Experts weigh-in on court-ordered release of Pfizer vaccine documents

Volume 90%

Due to the Olympics and Paralympic coverage, CTV News content may not be available outside of Canada. Regular out-of-country access will return at the completion of the Games on March 14, 2022. [72]

Updated March 12, 2022 1:19 a.m. CET

Published March 11, 2022 10:57 p.m. CET

Share

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lost a court battle, to protect the documents they used to approve the company’s COVID-19 vaccine.

On Sept. 16, 2021, a complaint was filed in a Texas court, by a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).

It reads in part “PHMPT exists for the sole purpose of disseminating to the public the data and information in the biological product files for each of the COVID-19 vaccines.”

The complaint was issued pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), demanding all the data and information the FDA relied upon to grant Pfizer a licence to sell their COVID-19 vaccine.

RELATED STORIES

“The medical and scientific community and the public have a substantial interest in reviewing the data and information underlying the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer Vaccine,” the document reads.

“Given the speed at which this came on the market, going to the mandate stage was going a step too far,” says Dr. David Healy, a member of PHMP and a psychiatrist practicing in Hamilton, Ont.

“I don’t have an issue with this vaccine or any vaccine, ok? I’m quite pro vaccines,” Dr. Healy told CTV News in a zoom interview. “My issue is actually with the science. Now in this case it’s access to the data.”

He likens Pfizer’s protection of their data, akin to creating his own vaccine at home, promising it works, but then not showing the evidence to support the claim.

“Pfizer on the other hand are able to say ‘well no you’re not going to see the evidence, we’re not going to let you see it,” says Dr. Healy. “That’s not science.”

During the court process, the FDA argued it would take them 75 years to redact all the personal information contained in the thousands of documents they have on file, related to the Pfizer vaccine.

On Jan. 6, 2022, Justice Mark Pittman ruled, “the court concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance.”

In his reasons, Justice Pittman wrote, “John McCain (correctly) noted that ‘excessive administrative secrecy feeds conspiracy theories and reduces the public’s confidence in the government.’”

Read the orders here.

It concludes:

  •  The FDA shall produce the “more than 12,000 pages” articulated in its own proposal, see ECF No. 29 at 24, on or before January 31, 2022.
  •  The FDA shall produce the remaining documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every 30 days, with the first production being due on or before March 1, 2022, until production is complete.
  •  To the extent the FDA asserts any privilege, exemption, or exclusion as to any responsive record or portion thereof, FDA shall, concurrent with each production required by this Order, produce a redacted version of the record, redacting only those portions as to which privilege, exemption, or exclusion is asserted.
  •  The Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report detailing the progress of the rolling production by April 1, 2022, and every 90 days thereafter.

Dr. Healy says it’s a win for anyone who wants to have all the facts in front of them, “before they put their lives on the line.”

However, Dr. Healy anticipates it will take some time before all of the documents are released to the public.

“It’ll all be out there in next two or three years,” says Dr. Healy. “So it’s not going to be 75 years, but it’s not going to be tomorrow.”

As a psychiatrist, Dr. Healy says it’s vital for him to understand the possible side effects of a drug or vaccine when dealing with his patients.

“Let’s say you’ve had the vaccine. Something has gone wrong. You don’t know if it’s linked to the vaccine, or not. It’s useful, for me, as part of the effort to try to work out, ‘well could it have been linked to the vaccine?’ So that I don’t try to treat you for a completely different problem.”

However, Dr. Healy has yet to see the documents he’s most interested to pour over, specifically the details of clinical trials, including how many people were in them, what happened to them and how their involvement changed the outcome of the studies.

He notes even though there are thousands upon thousands of documents to pour over, interested people need only to look through most of them to find what he calls “patterns.”

He would tackle it this way: “I’ve seen that word crop up before. Let’s see what the other document that I’m now looking at says about is actually going on here, and trying to see if there’s a level of consistency there.”

One of the documents is specifically about adverse events.

The 38-page report details the adverse events reported to Pfizer between Dec. 1, 2020, and Feb. 28, 2021.

The total number of doses shipped around the world in that time period is redacted.

However, a graph appears to indicate in that same time frame 42,086 adverse events were reported.

Of them, 1,223 are listed as fatal with another 9,400 listed as unknown adverse effects.

“The events themselves are not necessarily related to the vaccine,” says infectious disease expert, Dr. Dale Kalina. “It’s just part of the reporting process. And it is a requirement.”

Dr. Kalina says it’s “disingenuous” for people against COVID vaccines to imply the list of events is proof the vaccine isn’t safe.

“This is an affront to the reality that we know which is that after the billions of people that have received COVID vaccines, they are safe, they are effective. Yes, there are of course some side effects related to it,” says Dr. Kalina.

He notes each event doesn’t mean the vaccine caused that reaction, rather he says it was reported to Pfizer in the “days and weeks” after the vaccine was administered.

For instance, one of the adverse effects included in a report is about a child who swallowed a penny after getting the shot.

“Swallowing a penny is something that five-year-olds do, on occasion, unfortunately,” says Dr. Kalina. “But I think we can plainly see that that wasn’t related to administration of the vaccine itself, but it’s a good example of the fact that all adverse events are required to be documented.”

Dr. Gerald Evans, chair of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Queen’s University, says it’s “patently false” for people against COVID vaccines to use one graph in one document, as proof positive, the vaccine isn’t safe.

“The 1,223 deaths were actually amongst approximately 10,000,000 vaccine recipients giving an overall mortality rate of 0.01 per cent or 1 in 10,000 persons,” Dr. Evans wrote to CTV News in an email.

“Most were deaths from other causes occurring in persons who happened to have been vaccinated and were not caused by the vaccine itself,” says Dr. Evans.

“Data is power,” says Essex County pharmacist Tim Brady, but only when it’s taken with a grain of salt.

“Twelve hundred doesn’t mean they’re 12 hundred deaths related to the vaccine. It means that there was 12 hundred people that died over these millions of people that had the shot, that had the vaccine, that we have to consider, could it be a possibility (the vaccine caused their death)?” says Brady.

The report includes an appendix that lists all the adverse events, detailed in medical jargon over nine pages.

“The fact is, I find it reassuring that they have nine pages, that they’re documenting every possible side effect which is what we need to do,” says Brady.

He also notes the adverse effects included everything from fatigue to fibromyalgia.

“Any adverse effect from a vaccine is not something we want to see,” says Brady. “I’m highly confident that the vaccine saved more lives.”

Here’s more about adverse events, specifically.

https://windsor.ctvnews.ca/data-is-power-experts-weigh-in-on-court-ordered-release-of-pfizer-vaccine-documents-1.5816089

Medscape @Medscape Antibodies derived from natural COVID infection are more abundant and at least 10x more potent than immunity generated by vaccination alone. That’s not something we should ignore, scientists say.

COVID-19: Why Are We Ignoring Infection-Acquired Immunity?

Sheena Meredith, MB BS, MPhil | Disclosures | 28 February 2022

http://ms.spr.ly/6010wnz9o


Medscape

@Medscape

Antibodies derived from natural COVID infection are more abundant and at least 10x more potent than immunity generated by vaccination alone. That’s not something we should ignore, scientists say. http://ms.spr.ly/6010wnz9o

https://twitter.com/Medscape/status/1498674429194387468

ARTICLE

COVID-19: Why Are We Ignoring Infection-Acquired Immunity?

Sheena Meredith, MB BS, MPhil | Disclosures | 28 February 2022

Antibodies derived from natural infection with COVID-19 are more abundant and more potent – at least 10 times more potent – than immunity generated by vaccination alone, according to a study from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) in Portland, US, published on January 25.

Three days later, the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) reported in an MMWR Early Release that before Delta became the predominant variant in June 2021, case rates were higher among people who survived a previous infection than among people who were vaccinated alone. However by early October, those who had been previously infected had lower case rates than those who were vaccinated alone.

These studies focus renewed attention on the ongoing debate about the importance of infection-acquired immunity and the extent to which it should be taken into account in public health policy.

While many authorities do accept documented recovery from COVID-19 as a temporary ‘get out of jail free’ card, the allowance is generally short-lived and those who have been infected are still urged to get vaccinated.

Yet, although the OHSU study was used to conclude that the combination of vaccine with natural infection (hybrid immunity) induces a sort of ‘super-immunity’, irrespective of whether infection or vaccination comes first, there is increasing evidence that immunity derived from natural infection with COVID-19 gives powerful protection on its own. Natural immunity has been shown to be both highly protective and long lasting, and to safeguard against both re-infection and severe disease.

For example, a study in Geneva, Switzerland, of people infected in the first wave showed a 15.5% infection rate in seronegative individuals compared with just 1% in seropositives, giving overall protection attributable to infection of 94% – comparable with that in the original Pfizer vaccine trial.

Another study from India showed that seropositivity protected against both infection and severe disease, and suggested “strong plausibility that development of antibody following natural infection not only protects against re-infection by the virus to a great extent, but also safeguards against progression to severe COVID-19 disease”.

Natural infection also protects against the different variants that have arisen progressively since the start of the pandemic. A national database study including almost 22,000 people in Qatar published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that previous infection was “robust” – approximately 90% – in preventing reinfection with the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2, and approximately 60% “but still considerable” against Omicron. None of the re-infections progressed to critical or fatal outcomes and the effectiveness against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was estimated to be 69.4% against Alpha, 88.0% against Beta, 100% against Delta, and 87.8% against Omicron variants.

Long-Lasting Protection

Protection from natural immunity also seems to be durable. People infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 and early 2021 had around 72% to 86% protection against reinfection with the virus for at least 6 months, according to a study of US SpaceX employees partly funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and published earlier this month in PLOS Biology.

A multicentre, prospective cohort of NHS workers published in the Lancet showed an 84% lower risk after natural infection lasting at least 7 months. A report from Dublin published in January this year reviewed 11 large cohort studies and found natural immunity lasted at least 10 months.

“Re-infection was an uncommon event (absolute rate 0% to 1.1%), with no study reporting an increase in the risk of re-infection over time,” the authors said.

Another study following up first wave infections in Lombardy, Italy, before the emergence of variants, also showed that re-infections were rare and protection from infection lasted at least one year. In a further Italian study of 36 patients with documented COVID-19 infection in March 2020, who were followed to Sept 2021, the 17 individuals who remained unvaccinated demonstrated persistence of IgG antibodies to at least 18 months, according to a preprint study published last month.

And most recently, a study published online in JAMA on February 3 showed antibody levels sustained up to 20 months following a positive COVID-19 test.

Broadly-speaking then, natural immunity, so far, seems generally to last for at least as long as the studies assessing it, and to offer robust protection against both re-infection and, on the rare occasions re-infection has occurred, against severe outcomes.

Comparisons With Vaccine-induced Immunity

Furthermore, a study of over 30,000 Cleveland clinic employees followed for 4 months from the start of an mRNA vaccine roll out in December 2020 found cumulative infection rates did not differ between previously infected people who were or were not subsequently vaccinated, or those uninfected who received the vaccine. Researchers concluded that those previously infected “are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before”.

This accords with the general pre-COVID view that natural infection offers superior and lasting protection from disease compared with vaccination. It is increasingly acknowledged that while COVID vaccines protect against severe disease, they do not prevent infection per se, and it is now clear that they do not stop transmission, as even the Prime Minister has acknowledged.

Moreover, vaccine-induced protection wanes quite quickly, particularly since the advent of Delta and subsequent variants. Protection from infection by 6 months was reduced to just 29% from two doses of Pfizer and 59% from two doses of Moderna, with no detectable effectiveness at all from the AstraZeneca jab from 4 months onwards, according to a large nationwide study in Sweden also published this month.

A pre-publication study from Israel to be presented at this year’s European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases in Lisbon in April compared previously infected-unvaccinated people with double-vaccinated-never infected individuals. Results showed that, although over time the number of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies falls in both previously-infected and vaccinated patients, the performance of antibodies improves only after previous infection, and not after vaccination.

“This difference could explain why previously-infected patients appear to be better protected against a new infection than those who have only been vaccinated,” the researchers concluded.

Commenting on the study, Dr Julian Tang, a clinical virologist at the University of Leicester, said: “Generally, natural infection generates a broader and longer-lasting set of immune responses to all the viral antigens – so this is not really surprising.  After all, our immune systems have evolved over several million years to deal with all types of pathogens – so I would expect natural immunity to outperform any vaccine-induced immunity over the longer term.”

Caution Over Boosters

Declining protection from what were originally billed as ‘full courses’ of vaccines, resulting in increasing so-called ‘breakthrough’ infections even in the fully-vaccinated, have led to growing recommendations for booster shots. However the latest study, published this month from the CDC, showed waning immunity against severe disease just 4 months after a third dose of an mRNA vaccine, similar to the drop in effectiveness after a second dose.

Vaccine protection waned during both Delta and Omicron waves, and has been lower overall during the Omicron period. Even vaccine manufacturers now admit the likely need for annual jabs to maintain protection. However the effectiveness of boosters has been questioned, and repeated boosters may impart unexpected dangers: last month the head of the European Medicines Agency acknowledged the potential risk of immune system overload after multiple shots.

In addition, evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 may experience higher rates of side effects after vaccination, possibly due to existing levels of antibodies interacting with a subsequent vaccine to create immune complex deposition, has also been largely ignored. A comparison using data from the ZOE symptom app found that both local and systemic side-effects were more common among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection than among those without known past infection (systemic side-effects 2.9 times more common after the first dose of Pfizer and 1.6 times after the first dose of the Astra vaccine).

Public Health Policy

Yet, even where authorities allow documented recovery from COVID-19 as a temporary alternative for certification purposes or for exemption from vaccine mandates, the allowance is generally limited in scope or short-lived – in Austria and in the UK to just 6 months after a positive PCR test, even though protection has been shown to last far longer. In Germany, infection is now recognised for only 3 months (down from 6 months previously), whereas in Switzerland it confers ‘honorary vaccinated’ status for a full 12 months. In Canada, recovery is not recognised at all.

Similarly in the US at national level, there is no recognition of natural immunity under CDC policy. It has been admitted that this is partly for logistic reasons – it was viewed as too complicated to test people first: “It’s a lot easier to put a shot in their arm,” according to Alfred Sommer, dean emeritus of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. It is also partly political.

The message that even if someone has had COVID-19 it’s still better to get vaccinated “is not based on data. There’s something political going on around that”, according to Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease specialist at University of California San Francisco.

Comparative studies of natural infection and vaccination are also illuminative. A study in Israel showed that protection from reinfection decreased with time since previous infection, but was still higher than that conferred by two-dose vaccination at a similar time since the last immunity-conferring event.

Another Israeli study demonstrated that natural immunity conferred longer-lasting and stronger protection against re-infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalisation caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 compared with two-dose Pfizer/BNT vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant.

In the US, a pooled analysis of seven clinical studies showed “no statistical advantage to vaccination in the COVID-naive, compared with natural immunity in the COVID-recovered”. In addition: “Vaccination in the COVID-recovered may provide some incremental protective benefit, but the size of this benefit is marginal.”

The authors concluded: “COVID-recovered individuals should be considered to have at least equal protection to their vaccinated COVID-naïve counterparts… National policy should reflect the need for clinical equipoise and restraint in the decision to vaccinate these individuals by mandate.”

Back in January 2021, the CDC instructed everyone, regardless of previous infection, to get fully vaccinated as soon as they were eligible, stating on its website that natural immunity “varies from person to person” and “experts do not yet know how long someone is protected”.

Despite acknowledging some of these studies, the advice has not materially changed and still states that COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons, including those who have been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Yet length of protection after natural infection has now proven highly durable, and more so than that of vaccines absent multiple boosters. There is an increasingly strong argument that at the very least the protection afforded by natural infection might be acknowledged by allowing just one vaccine dose in the previously-infected. “This would also spare individuals from unnecessary pain when getting the second dose and it would free up additional vaccine doses,” according to virologist Florian Krammer of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

Such a policy is supported by a study part-funded by the US National Institutes of Health showing that whereas previously uninfected people reach peak immunity after a second vaccine dose, those who have recovered from previous infection reach peak immunity after the first dose. “A second dose… may be not necessary in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2,” the authors concluded.

This is the approach taken in the EU, where the digital COVID certificate can be issued after a single dose of an mRNA vaccine to people who have had a positive test result within the previous 6 months, although again the concession is time-limited.

NHS Staff Opposed to Mandates

However, such dispensations may not sway those healthcare workers prepared to lose their jobs rather than be vaccinated at all – one example of the unintended consequences of vaccine mandates. After 40,000 care workers were fired in November for refusing the jab, the potential loss of more crucial personnel at a time when there are already staff shortages provoked considerable concern and outright opposition from many national bodies, before Health Secretary Sajid Javid’s 11th hour row back on the NHS vax mandate.

Despite current attempts to woo back staff who resigned over the mandate, there are continuing pressures. Mr Javid – who had already asked professional regulators to conduct “urgent” reviews of their guidance on vaccination against occupational diseases, including COVID – immediately switched to urging the GMC to remind doctors of their duty to be vaccinated. A joint statement in response from the GMC and the Academy of the Medical Royal Colleges continued to urge doctors to get vaccinated, but stopped short of threatening disciplinary procedures. However senior NHS managers have been writing to staff telling them it is their “professional responsibility” to be vaccinated, and the NHS England medical director has warned that staff who remain unvaccinated against coronavirus could have this used against them in fitness-to-practise cases.

Many NHS staff worked with COVID patients all the way through the first wave – at personal risk and often with inadequate PPE – and thereby contracted infection in significant numbers. This underpinned at least some of the resistance to the mandate. Steve James, the ICU consultant whose on-camera encounter with Savid Javid attracted widespread media attention, told Mr Javid: “I’ve got antibodies, and I’ve been working on COVID ICU since the beginning… The protection I’ve got from transmission is probably equivalent to someone who’s vaccinated.”

Similarly, Dr Simon Fox, an NHS consultant in infectious diseases, has also spoken publicly about his unwillingness to be vaccinated. “Given I’ve had the infection and worked with patients with COVID for two years, I can hand-on-heart say I’m as immune as anyone else can claim to be,” Dr Fox told TalkRADIO at the end of January.

Both doctors, and others like them who feel the same way, have had extensive experience of treating the most serious COVID cases. They might reasonably expect that their professional assessment at least merits consideration. Moreover, like almost all those working in the health service, they will likely have been vaccinated against hepatitis B (although notably this is not a legal ruling), and have had, and advocated, most other vaccines. They are not ‘anti-vaxxers‘.

Ethics and Science

Yet, the protection afforded by natural immunity is still not acknowledged in policy responses, and NHS staff opposing the mandate have described its dismissal as “irrational”.

It also raises ethical questions over and above those of mandates and certifications generally. Is it justified to pressure people with pre-existing infection-acquired immunity to take a vaccine they neither want nor need? How can such individuals give proper informed consent, especially when they may be also at a higher than average risk of side-effects? Is it equitable to give unnecessary doses when vaccines have yet to be equally shared on a global level?

Moreover, the Government has repeatedly invoked ‘the science’ to reinforce coronavirus measures. Is inconvenient scientific evidence now being side-lined? Marty Makary, professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University told the BMJ in an interview last September: “Public health officials… talk about the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. If we want to be scientific, we should talk about the immune and the non-immune.”

So, should we at least give recognition to the equivalent and possibly superior status of natural immunity by giving those who have been infected an exemption from vaccine requirements? And if not, why not?

Lead Image Credit: Getty Images

https://www.medscape.co.uk/viewarticle/covid-19-why-are-we-ignoring-infection-acquired-immunity-2022a1000ifd

Medscape is the leading online global destination for physicians and healthcare professionals worldwide, offering the latest medical news and expert perspectives; essential point-of-care drug and disease information; and relevant professional education and CME.

https://www.medscape.com/public/about?ecd=ppc_google_acq_mscpedu_sl-ab_medscapebrand_ous-eu5-int

The Pfizer documents, Dr. John Campbell, March 9. 2022

Pfizer Documents reveal potential side effects, March 11, 2022,

Side effects usually occur within 24 hours after vccn. No doubt they are caused by the vccn.

https://uvrm.wordpress.com/2020/11/18/the-truth-about-the-corona-vaccines/

inally it’s official: The illusion of evidence based medicine BMJ 2022; 376 doi:

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o702

(Published March 16, 2022) Cite this as: BMJ 2022;376:o702

https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702

Unfortunately the one talking about it is still giving the wrong advice. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZlZIXHT0yA

Vitamin D should be gotten from the sun. Not from supplements. Is that why they are now letting it be said in the open how corrupted the medical industry is? Because people are now making themselves unhealthy with the wrong advice? Here you can see how to correct that: https://scentses4d.wordpress.com/2020/11/01/why-preventing-and-curing-diseases-naturally-is-not-common-practice-while-it-is-so-simple/

Goeie actie van een Franse cardioloog: de geweldige Julien Devilleger! Een dappere cardioloog in Frankrijk die een petitie begon waarin hij eiste dat de bijwerkingen van de cvd vcns door een senaatscommissie onderzocht zouden worden. De tekst van de petitie: In 2020 veroorzaakte de covid-19-epidemie een situatie die als een ernstige noodsituatie op gezondheidsgebied wordt beschouwd. Geconfronteerd met dit onbekende coronavirus, waarvan de eerste vorm in 2019 in Wuhan werd uitgeroepen, werden regeringen geconfronteerd met een complexe situatie. Frankrijk heeft besloten meer veiligheidsmaatregelen toe te passen dan gezondheidsmaatregelen, die een groot deel van onze burgers hebben getroffen: barrièremaatregelen, opsluiting, avondklok en maskers, ook voor kinderen die nog steeds aanwezig zijn, enz. Vervolgens koos de regering ervoor om een ​​puur ‘vaccin’-strategie toe te passen op basis van injecties van experimentele genetische preventieve medicijnen, met veelbelovende snelle effecten. Vervolgens werd een strategie van “alle vaccinaties” ingevoerd, een unieke reactie op de opeenvolgende golven van positieve gevallen, door vroegtijdige behandeling te verbieden (om redenen die nog moeten worden beoordeeld tijdens andere onderzoekscommissies), maar met succes gebruikt in veel landen zoals Indië. Pseudo-vaccins met nieuwe technologieën Deze “vaccins” zijn niet gebaseerd, in hun ontwerp en in hun werking, op traditionele methoden voor het ontwikkelen van vaccins volgens Pasteur. Deze experimentele geneesmiddelen voor preventie van genen maken gebruik van nieuwe technologieën, meestal recombinant boodschapper-RNA en DNA, die nog nooit eerder bij mensen zijn gebruikt om een ​​infectie te bestrijden. Hun handelsvergunning (WMA) werd verleend onder een spoedprocedure, na een versnelde fase I en II studie, waarvan de voorwaarden niet transparant waren. Fase III is nog in volle gang, de eerste resultaten worden verwacht in 2023: dit zijn experimentele stoffen waarvan de gunstige effecten, als ze al bestaan, van zeer korte duur lijken te zijn en waarvan de nadelige effecten op lange en middellange termijn onbekend zijn en, voor sommigen, zorgwekkend (modificatie van het genoom en epigenetica?). Vanwege zijn omvang moet deze “vaccinatie”-campagne, die midden in een epidemie en in een zeer aanhoudend tempo wordt uitgevoerd, worden gevolgd door een campagne voor toezicht en risicobeheer, vergelijkbaar met de gebruikelijke procedures voor toezicht en evaluatie van risico’s in de algemene bevolking. Onzekerheid over bijwerkingen. De onzekerheid over de veiligheid van deze nieuwe “vaccins” die in Frankrijk worden gebruikt, is bevestigd door de monitoring van de vaccinatiestrategieën die zowel op ons grondgebied als in de aangrenzende Europese landen worden toegepast. Het Astrazeneca-vaccin, voor het eerst aangeboden zonder enige specifieke contra-indicatie aan onze hele bevolking, is in twijfel getrokken vanwege talrijke gevallen van trombose in veel Europese landen, waarbij een evenwicht werd vastgesteld tussen het voordeel van “vaccinatie” en het risico op covid, althans onzeker , indien niet negatief. Vervolgens werd in een advies van de Hoge Autoriteit voor Volksgezondheid van 9 juli gevraagd om te vaccineren met de andere beschikbare vaccins. Ook Frankrijk is gestopt met het bestellen van dit vaccin. Wat betreft het Moderna-“vaccin”, nadat het is geïnjecteerd zonder enige specifieke beperking met betrekking tot leeftijdscategorieën of gezondheidstoestand, wordt het nu in twijfel getrokken door aangrenzende Europese landen, met name Scandinavië (Zweden, Noorwegen, Denemarken dan Finland) en Japan, die het verboden hebben voor mannen onder de 30. Deze omkeringen in ‘vaccinatie’-strategieën bevestigen de onzekerheid die heerst over de bijwerkingen van deze injecties. Deze onzekerheid, geïllustreerd door deze twee omkeringen, is een punt van zorg, omdat de bewezen bijwerkingen een relatief jonge populatie treffen, die weinig of niet vatbaar is voor complicaties door covid, maar het risico loopt een ernstig post-vaccinatie-effect te ontwikkelen. Het is noodzakelijk om deze twee feiten te plaatsen in het perspectief van de bijwerkingen die door verschillende officiële instanties, afhankelijk van de staten, worden verklaard. De VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reports, database met bijwerkingen van vaccins in de Verenigde Staten) meldt meer dan een miljoen bijwerkingen, waaronder 21.000 bevestigde sterfgevallen op 27, 21 december en 20.560 myocarditis. Volgens VAERS hebben covid-19-entingen in 1 jaar meer ernstige bijwerkingen geaccumuleerd dan ALLE ANDERE VACCINS IN 34 JAAR GECOMBINEERD. Het Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau (EMA) meldt bijwerkingen waarvan wordt vermoed dat ze verband houden met deze vaccinatiecampagne, gepubliceerd op EudraVigilance (EMA-database, rapportage van bijwerkingen buiten het VK): de totale door EudraVigilance geselecteerde bijwerkingen zijn gepubliceerd voor in totaal 1.327.876 meldingen, per 1 januari 2022. Pfizer: 668.442; Moderna: 188.082; Astra: 428.330; Janssen: 43.022. En in totaal 36.267 sterfgevallen die waarschijnlijk verband houden met de beheerdervan de injectie. (Pfizer: 16.481 doden; Moderna: 10.170 doden; AstraZeneca: 7.371 doden; Janssen: 2.245 doden). Andere cijfers in de wereld challenge, 50% van myocarditis en pericarditis trad op na de injectie van de tweede dosis, vooral bij mensen onder de 30 jaar (VAERS cijfers bevestigd in de EU, VK, Israël) en treft vooral de jongsten (jonger dan 20 jaar). ). In Frankrijk, in de woorden van de directeur-generaal van de ANSM, zelf, tijdens haar hoorzitting in de Senaat, op 29 december 2021, “weten we dat er onderrapportage is op het gebied van geneesmiddelenbewaking”. Ondanks alles maakt ze zich zorgen over het hoge aantal aangiften, vergeleken met voorgaande jaren: “Midden november 2021 hadden we 110.000 meldingen van bijwerkingen voor de 4 anti-covid-vaccins. In een normaal jaar hebben we 45.000 aangiften voor alle drugs samen”. De bijwerkingen die in minder dan een jaar bij de ANSM zijn gemeld in Frankrijk bedragen 121.486 gevallen, waarvan 24% ernstig. Trombose, myocarditis, pericarditis, acute pancreatitis, polyartritis, hartritmestoornissen, gordelroos en nu encefalitis en prionziekte (de zogenaamde gekkekoeienziekte) zijn goed beschreven complicaties. Meer dan 1.100 sterfgevallen, alleen voor het Pfizer-vaccin, worden gerapporteerd op de ANSM-website. Gewoonlijk wordt geschat dat slechts 10% van de gevallen wordt gemeld. Deze afwezigheid in geneesmiddelenbewakingsmonitoring wordt opgemerkt door een aantal academische onderzoeken, die het gebrek aan informatie voor zorgverleners benadrukken, hun beperkte tijdsbestek voor het monitoren van patiënten. Dit gebrek aan middelen kan leiden tot misbruiken, zoals een hoog aantal bijwerkingen waarmee geen rekening wordt gehouden en de zelfcensuur van zorgverleners op declaraties vanwege onwetendheid van het ingewikkelde mechanisme voor declaratie van geneesmiddelenbewaking. Bovendien boden de vaccinodrooms geen “after-sales” service, waardoor mensen in een situatie van nood verkeren en zonder enig mogelijk verhaal. Onzekerheid over de bijwerkingen van deze vaccins moet worden weggenomen De bijwerkingen van pseudo-vaccins worden niet in aanmerking genomen bij het optreden van de overheid, de minister van Volksgezondheid blijft de sterfgevallen ontkennen, zoals gemeld door de Franse overheidsinstantie. Deze negationistische verklaringen worden gevolgd door een sterke vaccinatiestimulans van de kant van de regering, hetzij door toespraken, maar ook door vrijheidsbeperkende maatregelen waarover in de vergaderzaal is gestemd. Wet nr. 2021-1465 van 10 november 2021 verlengt de vaccinatieplicht voor zorgverleners en onderwerpt fundamentele vrijheden aan de gezondheidspas voor burgers vanaf 12 jaar en dreigt te worden verergerd door de stemming over de lopende wet. Januari, de gezondheidspas omzetten in een vaccinatie. Momenteel dringen gezondheidsautoriteiten aan op vaccinatie van kinderen vanaf 5 jaar, terwijl kinderen onder de 19 jaar minder risico lopen op covid dan op gewone seizoensgriep (geen risico op covid bij kinderen zonder comorbiditeit) en dat het pseudovaccin geen beschermen tegen besmetting: geen individueel of collectief belang, maar ongewenste effecten die in de nabije toekomst catastrofaal kunnen blijken voor ons land. Overheidsactie houdt geen rekening met de aangegeven bijwerkingen die verband houden met “vaccins” en voert een beleid van quasi-verplichte vaccinatie, zonder een geneesmiddelenbewakingssysteem dat in overeenstemming is met deze maatregelen. Beschermende rol van het Parlement De rol van het parlement is om toezicht te houden op het optreden van de overheid. Het is ook om de link tussen politici en burgers essentieel te maken voor het democratische leven van ons land. Sinds enkele maanden is deze band verstevigd en wordt een vertrouwensbreuk vastgesteld tussen een deel van de bevolking en de autoriteiten. Grootschalige burgerdemonstraties en juist maatregelen die de fundamentele vrijheden van de overheid schenden nemen toe. De noodzaak is des te groter, gezien de schaal van “vaccinatie”, met een herinnering aan een derde dosis die nodig is voor de geldigheid van de gezondheidspas en binnenkort een vierde en de verlenging van de vaccinatie van kinderen vanaf 5 jaar. Gezien het aantal doden en ernstige ongevallen met langdurige gevolgen, is een moratorium op “vaccinatie” dringend noodzakelijk. Om een ​​nationale gezondheidsramp in de komende jaren te voorkomen, moet de Senaat, alvorens de uitvoerende macht toe te staan ​​haar strategie voort te zetten om indirecte deelname aan klinische proeven met geninjecties te eisen, ervoor zorgen dat geneesmiddelenbewaking voldoende is om bijwerkingen op korte, middellange en lange termijn. Hiervoor vragen we om een ​​onmiddellijke stopzetting van de injecties en om een ​​senatoriële onderzoekscommissie die de bijwerkingen van de vaccininjectie tegen covid-19 moet inventariseren, evenals het systeem van Franse geneesmiddelenbewaking, worden ingesteld. 8 februari 2022 is de petitie ingediend, en werd deze notitie gemakt: Tijdens haar vergadering van dinsdag 8 februari 2022 heeft de Conferentie van voorzitters besloten dit verzoekschrift in behandeling te nemen en het door te verwijzen naar de Commissie sociale zaken, die een besluit zal nemen over het te geven gevolg. Het heeft ook besloten om deze petitie te sluiten voor handtekeningen en voor degenen die met hetzelfde doel op het platform zijn gepubliceerd. Besluit van de Commissie sociale zaken: Tijdens haar vergadering van woensdag 9 februari 2022 besloot de commissie, overeenkomstig artikel 6 ter van verordening nr. 58-1100 van 17 november 1958, de zaak voor te leggen aan het parlementair bureau voor de evaluatie van wetenschappelijke en technologische keuzes. Vind het persbericht op de Senaatswebsite: Bijwerkingen van vaccins: reageren op zorgen https://petitions.senat.fr/initiatives/i-917 En 9 februari kwam het antwoord al: woensdag 9 februari 2022 Gezien de sterke dynamiek van de handtekeningen van de petitie die op het Senaatsplatform is ingediend over de bijwerkingen van vaccins en geneesmiddelenbewaking en met de nadering van de opschorting van de werkzaamheden van de Senaat in openbare zitting, besloot de Conferentie van voorzitters ernaar te handelen zonder vertraging. Hij gaf de Commissie sociale zaken de opdracht om de vorm van de uit te voeren werkzaamheden vast te stellen. De commissie had al grote belangstelling opgemerkt voor een ANSM-hoorzitting in december 2021 over hetzelfde onderwerp, namelijk de bijwerkingen van vaccins, waarvan het kalme en diepgaande onderzoek op basis van rigoureus wetenschappelijk onderzoek een garantie is voor vertrouwen en aanvaardbaarheid van de genomen maatregelen. Ze herinnert zich dat terughoudendheid met vaccins in 2019 verscheen op de lijst van de 10 grootste bedreigingen voor de wereldwijde gezondheid, geïdentificeerd door de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie. De petitie is 8 februari ingediend: Tijdens haar vergadering van vandaag heeft de commissie op grond van artikel 6 ter van ordonnantie nr. . Voor de voorzitter van de commissie, Catherine Deroche: “We moeten reageren op de bezorgdheid die wordt geuit. Door zijn praktijk van controverse en zijn vermogen om de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap in zijn diversiteit te mobiliseren, leek het ons in staat om de voorwaarden te scheppen voor ‘een sereen onderzoek van deze onderwerpen’. http://www.senat.fr/presse/cp20220209a.html De initiatiefnemer: https://www.charentelibre.fr/sante/la-rochefoucauld-le-cardiologue-antivax-nargue-les-autorites-7340747.php Interviews met hem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHAvgGIJ-M4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OA4eeAmRvw

Bill gates admits natural immunity is better than vaccine.

“Sadly, the virus itself, particularly, the variant called omicron, is a type of vaccine, that is, it creates both B-cell and T-cell immunity, and it’s done a better job getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines,” the Microsoft co-founder said. “That means the chance of severe disease, which is mainly associated with being elderly and having obesity or diabetes, those risks are now dramatically reduced because of that infection, exposure.”

After coronavirus vaccine failures, France laments the state of its biomedical R&D

Researchers blame squeeze in basic research funding and scarce venture capital for biotech startups

https://www.science.org/content/article/after-coronavirus-vaccine-failures-france-laments-state-its-biomedical-rd

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

Mar 16, 2022

FDA Begins Releasing Pfizer COVID Vax Documents

— Court-ordered release runs risk of “cherry picking and taking things out of context”

by Amanda D’Ambrosio, Enterprise & Investigative Writer, MedPage Today March 7, 2022


share to facebook

share to twitter

share to linkedin

email article

A computer rendering of a man in a suit looking at a document while standing on top of and surrounded by tall stacks of paper

The FDA turned over thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine last week, marking the first of several releases mandated by a court in Texas earlier this year.

The agency released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents last Tuesday, following a loss in court months earlier that forced it to expedite its process to make the information available to the public. In a January court order, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages.

The nonprofit that won the case, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, sued the FDA last September, claiming that the agency denied its request to expedite the release of COVID-19 vaccine review documents via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In a November joint status report, the FDA proposed releasing around 500 pages of the documents each month — which would fulfill the organization’s FOIA request in about 55 to 75 years.

The agency must redact confidential business and trade secret information from Pfizer and BioNTech, as well as any private information on patients in the clinical trial. In its proposal for a 55-year timeline, the FDA noted that the branch that would handle the request has only 10 employees, and is currently processing around 400 other FOIA requests.

Although the court recognized the “unduly burdensome challenges” that this request imposed on the FDA, it concluded that the release of these documents is of “paramount public importance,” stating that expediting the process is “not only practicable, but necessary.” Both the FDA and the nonprofit will submit a joint status report by April 1 detailing the progress of the request.

After the FDA distributed the first batch of the documents last week, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency posted the files on its own website. The content of the documents ranges widely, with no real explanation of what the files entail. One listed de-identified data on clinical trial patient demographics and medical history, while another detailed the FDA’s response to Pfizer’s request for fast track review. One included postmarketing safety data based on voluntarily reported adverse events.

Zach Zalewski, PhD, JD, a regulatory strategy consultant at Avalere Health, said that many of the documents that will be released were submitted to the FDA up through the vaccine’s emergency use authorization and full approval, and may not be material to an overall analysis of the vaccine’s safety and efficacy. The FDA already published a drug approval package for Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine, which consists of summaries of the FDA-reviewed data. The documents that the agency is required to release will likely comprise the unabridged version of this report, Zalewski said.

“This will literally include every scrap of paper that was submitted to FDA for the entirety of the pandemic,” Zalewski told MedPage Today. “If transparency is what they want, transparency is what they’ll get.”

Anti-vaccine advocates have already capitalized on the release of these documents to further call COVID-19 vaccines into question. Children’s Health Defense, a nonprofit that has taken a stance against the use of COVID vaccines in kids, highlighted a list of adverse events reported in the documents — a list that includes any adverse events that occurred in people who participated in the clinical trial, even those who received placebo, and is misleading, experts have said.

“There’s a risk of cherry picking and taking things out of context,” Zalewski said. “Just because you will have all the data in front of you, that doesn’t mean you’ll reach any different conclusions.”

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency includes several physicians known for spreading false or misleading information during the pandemic, including Aaron Kheriaty, MDHarvey Risch, MD, PhD, and Peter McCullough, MD.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/97544

Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto

Jan. 18, 2022, 10:00 AM

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto

    

First published at 12:57 UTC on December 11th, 2021.

PFIZER DOCUMENTS – FIRST RELEASE OF ADVERSE EVENTS REPORT

The vaccines delete DNA.

The side effects were known. It was also known that natural immunity was more effective than the vaccine. And it was already known that the side effects from the vaccines are way worse than Covid.

Pfizer Docs Discussed: https://ept.ms/3LNXgkv
https://ept.ms/3v21luJ
https://ept.ms/38pMXoo
www.MAGAlionHAT.com
https://ept.ms/3v21luJ
All Pfizer Docs: https://ept.ms/3n6gsjs
FDA document a Texas judge forced them to release: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/…

 MORE

CategoryNews & Politics
SensitivityNormal – Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over

FDA begins court-mandated release of thousands of pages on Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine review
Zachary Brennan
Senior Editor
A court loss for the FDA in a Texas district court means the agency on Tuesday began to release a massive trove of hundreds of thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer’s safe and effective Covid-19 vaccine.

But what exactly will be uncovered in each batch of released documents is anyone’s guess.

The nonprofit that won the court case, known as the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, promptly released the Pfizer documents on its website this week but did not offer any sort of organization or explanation of what they show.

FDA loses FOIA suit over Pfizer vaccine documents, must release 55,000 pages per month
Some of the documents, like one labeled as a priority review request, includes more than 100 pages worth of anonymous safety-related tables of data. Or another table of unidentified participants’ gender, age and BMI.

Other documents are typical for any drug or vaccine application. For instance, one document shows the standard, nearly $2.9 million user fee payment to FDA from Pfizer. Other documents released include the fast track designation letter, which is not typically released, the confidential nonclinical overview for the vaccine, Pfizer’s request for a waiver from adding a suffix to the vaccine’s name (also not typically released), and another with a long list of anonymized trial subjects who didn’t receive the vaccine as randomized.

The sheer volume of pages and document types will give readers a good overall sense of the required documentation necessary to apply for a drug or vaccine approval at the FDA. But it’s still unclear if the documents will offer any new insight into the vaccine’s safety or efficacy, especially given the real-world data on the vaccine that’s already been published in major medical journals (e.g. Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness and safety in health care personnel or Israel).

Anti-vax lawyer Aaron Siri, a managing partner of the firm Siri & Glimstad who represented the nonprofit, told Endpoints News, “Our job was to get the documents. We leave it to the scientists and others to analyze.”

Previously Siri wrote on his Substack that what drove this suit was that the government “wanted to hide the data by waiting to fully produce what it relied upon to license this product until almost every American alive today is dead.”

AUTHOR
Zachary Brennan
Senior Editor
zachary@endpointsnews.com
@ZacharyBrennan
Zachary

Link to Pfizer documents

Study: Pfizer COVID shot converts into DNA in human cells

Posted by ClarkCountyToday.com

Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022

in: COVID-19News

share

00

Contrary to the CDC's claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not "change or interact with your DNA in any way," a new Swedish study finds Pfizer's shot goes into liver cells and converts to DNA.
File photo

https://anchor.fm/clarkcountytodaynews/embed/episodes/Study-Pfizer-COVID-shot-converts-into-DNA-in-human-cells-e1f3ul8

Findings conflict with CDC’s claim that vaccine never enters nucleus

Art Moore
WND News Center

Contrary to the CDC’s claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not “change or interact with your DNA in any way,” a new Swedish study finds Pfizer’s shot goes into liver cells and converts to DNA.

It’s the first time that researchers have shown in vitro – or inside a petri dish – how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, the Epoch Times reported.

It’s precisely what health experts and fact-checkers said for more than a year could not occur.

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist who is one of the leading critics of the COVID vaccines, said the findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change” that could drive a “whole new genre of chronic disease.”

The CDC assures Americans that the mRNA and the spike protein it produces in COVID-19 vaccines to create an immune response “don’t last long in the body.” On its website, the agency states: “Our cells break down mRNA and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination. Scientists estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks.”

Further, the CDC says on a web page titled “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines” that the “genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells.”

However, the researchers at Lund University in Malmö, Sweden, found that the mRNA vaccine enters human liver cells and triggers the cell’s DNA in the nucleus to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.

The whole process occurred rapidly, within six hours, concluded the study, which was published by the university’s Department of Clinical Sciences.

Pfizer did not comment on the study’s findings, the Epoch Times reported, stating only that its mRNA vaccine does not alter the human genome.

“Our COVID-19 vaccine does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell,” a Pfizer spokesperson told paper in an email. “It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity.”

Earlier this month, as WND reported, a peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious journal Cell by researchers at Stanford University found that the spike protein created by the COVID vaccines remains in the body much longer than believed and at levels higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients.

The Stanford researchers tested the duration of the protein in the body for 60 days and found that it lasted at least that long.

Dr. Robert Malone, the key inventor of the mRNA technology platform that later was used in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, described the implications of the Stanford study as a potential “health public policy nightmare” in an analysis on his Substack page.

The Swedish researchers also concluded the spike proteins expressed on the surface of the liver cells through the vaccine could target the immune system and possibly cause autoimmune hepatitis. They noted “case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis” after getting the Pfizer shot.

The authors of the study cited the case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis a week after her first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The researchers said there is a possibility that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals.”

settings

Open AccessArticle

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

settings

Open AccessArticle

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

by 

Markus Aldén 1,

Francisko Olofsson Falla 1,

Daowei Yang 1,

Mohammad Barghouth 1,

Cheng Luan 1,

Magnus Rasmussen 2 and

Yang De Marinis 1,*

1

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden

2

Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden

*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Academic Editor: Stephen Malnick

Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 202244(3), 1115-1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073

Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022

(This article belongs to the Topic Clinical, Translational and Basic Research on Liver Diseases)

Download PDF 

Browse Figures

Citation Export

Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

In the current study, we employed a human liver cell line for in vitro investigation. It is worth investigating if the liver cells also present the vaccine-derived SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which could potentially make the liver cells targets for previously primed spike protein reactive cytotoxic T cells. There has been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis [39] after BNT162b2 vaccination. To obtain better understanding of the potential effects of BNT162b2 on liver function, in vivo models are desired for future studies.

The Pfizer EMA assessment report also showed that BNT162b2 distributes in the spleen (<1.1%), adrenal glands (<0.1%), as well as low and measurable radioactivity in the ovaries and testes (<0.1%) [26].

Our results showed that BNT162b2 mRNA readily enters Huh7 cells at a concentration (0.5 µg/mL) corresponding to 0.5% of the local injection site concentration, induce changes in LINE-1 gene and protein expression, and within 6 h, reverse transcription of BNT162b2 can be detected. 


zoom_out_map
 search menu

Journals 

CIMB 

Volume 44 

Issue 3 

10.3390/cimb44030073 

settings

Open AccessArticle

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

by 

Markus Aldén 1,

Francisko Olofsson Falla 1,

Daowei Yang 1,

Mohammad Barghouth 1,

Cheng Luan 1,

Magnus Rasmussen 2 and

Yang De Marinis 1,*

1

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden

2

Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden

*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Academic Editor: Stephen Malnick

Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 202244(3), 1115-1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073

Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022

(This article belongs to the Topic Clinical, Translational and Basic Research on Liver Diseases)

Download PDF 

Browse Figures

Citation Export

Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

Keywords: COVID-19 mRNA vaccineBNT162b2liverreverse transcriptionLINE-1Huh7

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was announced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global pandemic on 11 March 2020, and it emerged as a devasting health crisis. As of February 2022, COVID-19 has led to over 430 million reported infection cases and 5.9 million deaths worldwide [1]. Effective and safe vaccines are urgently needed to reduce the morbidity and mortality rates associated with COVID-19.

Several vaccines for COVID-19 have been developed, with particular focus on mRNA vaccines (by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), replication-defective recombinant adenoviral vector vaccines (by Janssen-Johnson and Johnson, Astra-Zeneca, Sputnik-V, and CanSino), and inactivated vaccines (by Sinopharm, Bharat Biotech and Sinovac). The mRNA vaccine has the advantages of being flexible and efficient in immunogen design and manufacturing, and currently, numerous vaccine candidates are in various stages of development and application. Specifically, COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 developed by Pfizer and BioNTech has been evaluated in successful clinical trials [2,3,4] and administered in national COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in different regions around the world [5,6,7,8].

BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)–encapsulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine (modRNA) and encodes the full-length of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, modified by two proline mutations to ensure antigenically optimal pre-fusion conformation, which mimics the intact virus to elicit virus-neutralizing antibodies [3]. Consistent with randomized clinical trials, BNT162b2 showed high efficiency in a wide range of COVID-19-related outcomes in a real-world setting [5]. Nevertheless, many challenges remain, including monitoring for long-term safety and efficacy of the vaccine. This warrants further evaluation and investigations. The safety profile of BNT162b2 is currently only available from short-term clinical studies. Less common adverse effects of BNT162b2 have been reported, including pericarditis, arrhythmia, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and thrombocytopenia [4,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. There are also studies that report adverse effects observed in other types of vaccines [21,22,23,24]. To better understand mechanisms underlying vaccine-related adverse effects, clinical investigations as well as cellular and molecular analyses are needed.

A recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells [25]. This gives rise to the question of if this may also occur with BNT162b2, which encodes partial SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In pharmacokinetics data provided by Pfizer to European Medicines Agency (EMA), BNT162b2 biodistribution was studied in mice and rats by intra-muscular injection with radiolabeled LNP and luciferase modRNA. Radioactivity was detected in most tissues from the first time point (0.25 h), and results showed that the injection site and the liver were the major sites of distribution, with maximum concentrations observed at 8–48 h post-dose [26]. Furthermore, in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection, reversible hepatic effects were observed, including enlarged liver, vacuolation, increased gamma glutamyl transferase (γGT) levels, and increased levels of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [26]. Transient hepatic effects induced by LNP delivery systems have been reported previously [27,28,29,30], nevertheless, it has also been shown that the empty LNP without modRNA alone does not introduce any significant liver injury [27]. Therefore, in this study, we aim to examine the effect of BNT162b2 on a human liver cell line in vitro and investigate if BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed into DNA through endogenous mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Huh7 cells (JCRB Cell Bank, Osaka, Japan) were cultured in 37 °C at 5% CO2 with DMEM medium (HyClone, HYCLSH30243.01) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, F7524-500ML, Burlington, MA, USA) and 1% (v/v) Penicillin-Streptomycin (HyClone, SV30010, Logan, UT, USA). For BNT162b2 treatment, Huh7 cells were seeded with a density of 200,000 cells/well in 24-well plates. BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer BioNTech, New York, NY, USA) was diluted with sterile 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP into a final concentration of 100 μg/mL as described in the manufacturer’s guideline [31]. BNT162b2 suspension was then added in cell culture media to reach final concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 μg/mL. Huh7 cells were incubated with or without BNT162b2 for 6, 24, and 48 h. Cells were washed thoroughly with PBS and harvested by trypsinization and stored in −80 °C until further use.

2.2. REAL-TIME RT-QPCR

RNA from the cells was extracted with RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, 74134, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RT-PCR was performed using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, K1622, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturers protocol. Real-time qPCR was performed using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, K0222, Waltham, MA, USA) with primers for BNT162b2, LINE-1 and housekeeping genes ACTB and GAPDH (Table 1).

Table 1. Primer sequences of RT-qPCR and PCR.

Table

2.3. Immunofluorescence Staining and Confocal Imaging

Huh7 cells were cultured in eight-chamber slides (LAB-TEK, 154534, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) with a density of 40,000 cells/well, with or without BNT162b2 (0.5, 1 or 2 µg/mL) for 6 h. Immunohistochemistry was performed using primary antibody anti-LINE-1 ORF1p mouse monoclonal antibody (Merck, 3574308, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), secondary antibody Cy3 Donkey anti-mouse (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA), and Hoechst (Life technologies, 34850, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the protocol from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA). Two images per condition were taken using a Zeiss LSM 800 and a 63X oil immersion objective, and the staining intensity was quantified on the individual whole cell area and the nucleus area on 15 cells per image by ImageJ 1.53c. LINE-1 staining intensity for the cytosol was calculated by subtracting the intensity of the nucleus from that of the whole cell. All images of the cells were assigned a random number to prevent bias. To mark the nuclei (determined by the Hoechst staining) and the whole cells (determined by the borders of the LINE-1 fluorescence), the Freehand selection tool was used. These areas were then measured, and the mean intensity was used to compare the groups.

2.4. Genomic DNA Purification, PCR Amplification, Agarose Gel Purification, and Sanger Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from cell pellets with PBND buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.45% NP-40, 0.45% Tween-20) according to protocol described previously [32]. To remove residual RNA from the DNA preparation, RNase (100 µg/mL, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was added to the DNA preparation and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by 5 min at 95 °C. PCR was then performed using primers targeting BNT162b2 (sequences are shown in Table 1), with the following program: 5 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; finally, 72 °C for 5 min and 12 °C for 5 min. PCR products were run on 1.4% (w/v) agarose gel. Bands corresponding to the amplicons of the expected size (444 bps) were cut out and DNA was extracted using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, 28104, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequence of the DNA amplicon was verified by Sanger sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany).

Statistics

Statistical comparisons were performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test and ANOVA. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM or ± SD. Differences with p < 0.05 are considered significant.

2.5. Ethical Statements

The Huh7 cell line was obtained from Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB) Cell Bank.

3. Results

3.1. BNT162b2 Enters Human Liver Cell Line Huh7 Cells at High Efficiency

To determine if BNT162b2 enters human liver cells, we exposed human liver cell line Huh7 to BNT162b2. In a previous study on the uptake kinetics of LNP delivery in Huh7 cells, the maximum biological efficacy of LNP was observed between 4–7 h [33]. Therefore, in our study, Huh7 cells were cultured with or without increasing concentrations of BNT162b2 (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 µg/mL) for 6, 24, and 48 h. RNA was extracted from cells and a real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using primers targeting the BNT162b2 sequence, as illustrated in Figure 1. The full sequence of BNT162b2 is publicly available [34] and contains a two-nucleotides cap; 5′- untranslated region (UTR) that incorporates the 5′ -UTR of a human α-globin gene; the full-length of SARS-CoV-2 S protein with two proline mutations; 3′-UTR that incorporates the human mitochondrial 12S rRNA (mtRNR1) segment and human AES/TLE5 gene segment with two C→U mutations; poly(A) tail. Detailed analysis of the S protein sequence in BNT162b2 revealed 124 sequences that are 100% identical to human genomic sequences and three sequences with only one nucleotide (nt) mismatch in 19–26 nts (Table S1, see Supplementary Materials). To detect BNT162b2 RNA level, we designed primers with forward primer located in SARS-CoV-2 S protein regions and reverse primer in 3′-UTR, which allows detection of PCR amplicon unique to BNT162b2 without unspecific binding of the primers to human genomic regions.

Cimb 44 00073 g001 550

Figure 1. PCR primer set used to detect mRNA level and reverse-transcription of BNT162b2. Illustration of BNT162b2 was adapted from previously described literature [34].

RT-qPCR results showed that Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 had high levels of BNT162b2 mRNA relative to housekeeping genes at 6, 24, and 48 h (Figure 2, presented in logged 2−ΔΔCT due to exceptionally high levels). The three BNT162b2 concentrations led to similar intracellular BNT162b2 mRNA levels at the different time points, except that the significant difference between 1.0 and 2.0 µg/mL was observed at 48 h. BNT162b2 mRNA levels were significantly decreased at 24 h compared to 6 h, but increased again at 48 h.

Cimb 44 00073 g002 550

Figure 2. BNT162b2 mRNA levels in Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2. Huh7 cells were treated without (Ctrl) or with 0.5 (V1), 1 (V2), and 2 µg/mL (V3) of BNT162b2 for 6 (green dots), 24 (orange dots), and 48 h (blue dots). RNA was purified and qPCR was performed using primers targeting BNT162b2. RNA levels of BNT162b2 are presented as logged 2−ΔΔCT values relative to house-keeping genes GAPDH and ACTB. Results are from five independent experiments (n = 5). Differences between respective groups were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. respective control at each time point, or as indicated).

3.2. Effect of BNT162b2 on Human Endogenous Reverse Transcriptase Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1 (LINE-1)

Here we examined the effect of BNT162b2 on LINE-1 gene expression. RT-qPCR was performed on RNA purified from Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 µg/mL) for 6, 24, and 48 h, using primers targeting LINE-1. Significantly increased LINE-1 expression compared to control was observed at 6 h by 2.0 µg/mL BNT162b2, while lower BNT162b2 concentrations decreased LINE-1 expression at all time points (Figure 3).

Cimb 44 00073 g003 550

Figure 3. LINE-1 mRNA levels in Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2. Huh7 cells were treated without (Ctrl) or with 0.5 (V1), 1 (V2), and 2 µg/mL (V3) of BNT162b2 for 6 (green dots), 24 (red dots), and 48 h (blue dots). RNA was purified and qPCR was performed using primers targeting LINE-1. RNA levels of LINE-1 are presented as 2−ΔΔCT values relative to house-keeping genes GAPDH and ACTB. Results are from five independent experiments (n = 5). Differences between respective groups were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. respective control at each time point, or as indicated; † p < 0.05 vs. 6 h-Ctrl).

Next, we studied the effect of BNT162b2 on LINE-1 protein level. The full-length LINE-1 consists of a 5′ untranslated region (UTR), two open reading frames (ORFs), ORF1 and ORF2, and a 3′UTR, of which ORF1 is an RNA binding protein with chaperone activity. The retrotransposition activity of LINE-1 has been demonstrated to involve ORF1 translocation to the nucleus [35]. Huh7 cells treated with or without BNT162b2 (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 µg/mL) for 6 h were fixed and stained with antibodies binding to LINE-1 ORF1p, and DNA-specific probe Hoechst for visualization of cell nucleus (Figure 4a). Quantification of immunofluorescence staining intensity showed that BNT162b2 increased LINE-1 ORF1p protein levels in both the whole cell area and nucleus at all concentrations tested (Figure 4b–d).

Cimb 44 00073 g004 550

Figure 4. Immunohistochemistry of Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 on LINE-1 protein distribution. Huh7 cells were treated without (Ctrl) or with 0.5, 1, and 2 µg/mL of BNT162b2 for 6 h. Cells were fixed and stained with antibodies binding to LINE-1 ORF1p (red) and DNA-specific probe Hoechst for visualization of cell nucleus (blue). (a) Representative images of LINE-1 expression in Huh7 cells treated with or without BNT162b2. (bd) Quantification of LINE-1 protein in whole cell area (b), cytosol (c), and nucleus (d). All data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA, and graphs were created using GraphPad Prism V 9.2. All data is presented as mean ± SD (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001 as indicated).

3.3. Detection of Reverse Transcribed BNT162b2 DNA in Huh7 Cells

A previous study has shown that entry of LINE-1 protein into the nucleus is associated with retrotransposition [35]. In the immunofluorescence staining experiment described above, increased levels of LINE-1 in the nucleus were observed already at the lowest concentration of BNT162b2 (0.5 µg/mL). To examine if BNT162b2 is reversely transcribed into DNA when LINE-1 is elevated, we purified genomic DNA from Huh7 cells treated with 0.5 µg/mL of BNT162b2 for 6, 24, and 48 h. Purified DNA was treated with RNase to remove RNA and subjected to PCR using primers targeting BNT162b2, as illustrated in Figure 1. Amplified DNA fragments were then visualized by electrophoresis and gel-purified (Figure 5). BNT162b2 DNA amplicons were detected in all three time points (6, 24, and 48 h). Sanger sequencing confirmed that the DNA amplicons were identical to the BNT162b2 sequence flanked by the primers (Table 2). To ensure that the DNA amplicons were derived from DNA but not BNT162b2 RNA, we also performed PCR on RNA purified from Huh7 cells treated with 0.5 µg/mL BNT162b2 for 6 h, with or without RNase treatment (Ctrl 5 and 6 in Figure 5), and no amplicon was detected in the RNA samples subjected to PCR.

Cimb 44 00073 g005 550

Figure 5. Detection of DNA amplicons of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2. Huh7 cells were treated without (Ctrl) or with 0.5 µg/mL of BNT162b2 for 6, 24, and 48 h. Genomic DNA was purified and digested with 100 µg/mL RNase. PCR was run on all samples with primers targeting BNT162b2, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. DNA amplicons (444 bps) were visualized on agarose gel. BNT: BNT162b2; L: DNA ladder; Ctrl1: cultured Huh7 cells; Ctrl2: Huh7 cells without BNT162b2 treatment collected at 6 h; Ctrl3: Huh7 cells without BNT162b2 treatment collected at 24 h; Ctrl4: Huh7 cells without BNT162b2 treatment collected at 48 h; Ctrl5: RNA from Huh7 cells treated with 0.5 µg/mL of BNT162b2 for 6 h; Ctrl6: RNA from Huh7 cells treated with 0.5 µg/mL of BNT162b2 for 6 h, digested with RNase.

Table 2. Sanger sequencing result of the BNT162b2 amplicon.

Table

4. Discussion

In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 h after BNT162b2 exposure. A possible mechanism for reverse transcription is through endogenous reverse transcriptase LINE-1, and the nucleus protein distribution of LINE-1 is elevated by BNT162b2.

Intracellular accumulation of LNP in hepatocytes has been demonstrated in vivo [36]. A preclinical study on BNT162b2 showed that BNT162b2 enters the human cell line HEK293T cells and leads to robust expression of BNT162b2 antigen [37]. Therefore, in this study, we first investigated the entry of BNT162b2 in the human liver cell line Huh7 cells. The choice of BNT162b2 concentrations used in this study warrants explanation. BNT162b2 is administered as a series of two doses three weeks apart, and each dose contains 30 µg of BNT162b2 in a volume of 0.3 mL, which makes the local concentration at the injection site at the highest 100 µg/mL [31]. A previous study on mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses using a similar LNP delivery system showed that the mRNA vaccine can distribute rather nonspecifically to several organs such as liver, spleen, heart, kidney, lung, and brain, and the concentration in the liver is roughly 100 times lower than that of the intra-muscular injection site [38]. In the assessment report on BNT162b2 provided to EMA by Pfizer, the pharmacokinetic distribution studies in rats demonstrated that a relatively large proportion (up to 18%) of the total dose distributes to the liver [26]. We therefore chose to use 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL of vaccine in our experiments on the liver cells. However, the effect of a broader range of lower and higher concentrations of BNT162b2 should also be verified in future studies.

In the current study, we employed a human liver cell line for in vitro investigation. It is worth investigating if the liver cells also present the vaccine-derived SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which could potentially make the liver cells targets for previously primed spike protein reactive cytotoxic T cells. There has been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis [39] after BNT162b2 vaccination. To obtain better understanding of the potential effects of BNT162b2 on liver function, in vivo models are desired for future studies.

In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided [26]. Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination.

Human autonomous retrotransposon LINE-1 is a cellular endogenous reverse transcriptase and the only remaining active transposon in humans, able to retrotranspose itself and other nonautonomous elements [40,41], and ~17% of the human genome are comprised of LINE-1 sequences [42]. The nonautonomous Alu elements, short, interspersed nucleotide elements (SINEs), variable-number-of-tandem-repeats (VNTR), as well as cellular mRNA-processed pseudogenes, are retrotransposed by the LINE-1 retrotransposition proteins working in trans [43,44]. A recent study showed that endogenous LINE-1 mediates reverse transcription and integration of SARS-CoV-2 sequences in the genomes of infected human cells [25]. Furthermore, expression of endogenous LINE-1 is often increased upon viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2 infection [45,46,47]. Previous studies showed that LINE-1 retrotransposition activity is regulated by RNA metabolism [48,49], DNA damage response [50], and autophagy [51]. Efficient retrotransposition of LINE-1 is often associated with cell cycle and nuclear envelope breakdown during mitosis [52,53], as well as exogenous retroviruses [54,55], which promotes entrance of LINE-1 into the nucleus. In our study, we observed increased LINE-1 ORF1p distribution as determined by immunohistochemistry in the nucleus by BNT162b2 at all concentrations tested (0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL), while elevated LINE-1 gene expression was detected at the highest BNT162b2 concentration (2 μg/mL). It is worth noting that gene transcription is regulated by chromatin modifications, transcription factor regulation, and the rate of RNA degradation, while translational regulation of protein involves ribosome recruitment on the initiation codon, modulation of peptide elongation, termination of protein synthesis, or ribosome biogenesis. These two processes are controlled by different mechanisms, and therefore they may not always show the same change patterns in response to external challenges. The exact regulation of LINE-1 activity in response to BNT162b2 merits further study.

The cell model that we used in this study is a carcinoma cell line, with active DNA replication which differs from non-dividing somatic cells. It has also been shown that Huh7 cells display significant different gene and protein expression including upregulated proteins involved in RNA metabolism [56]. However, cell proliferation is also active in several human tissues such as the bone marrow or basal layers of epithelia as well as during embryogenesis, and it is therefore necessary to examine the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity under such conditions. Furthermore, effective retrotransposition of LINE-1 has also been reported in non-dividing and terminally differentiated cells, such as human neurons [57,58].

The Pfizer EMA assessment report also showed that BNT162b2 distributes in the spleen (<1.1%), adrenal glands (<0.1%), as well as low and measurable radioactivity in the ovaries and testes (<0.1%) [26]. Furthermore, no data on placental transfer of BNT162b2 is available from Pfizer EMA assessment report. Our results showed that BNT162b2 mRNA readily enters Huh7 cells at a concentration (0.5 µg/mL) corresponding to 0.5% of the local injection site concentration, induce changes in LINE-1 gene and protein expression, and within 6 h, reverse transcription of BNT162b2 can be detected. It is therefore important to investigate further the effect of BNT162b2 on other cell types and tissues both in vitro and in vivo.

5. Conclusions

Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44030073/s1.

Author Contributions

M.A., F.O.F., D.Y., M.B. and C.L. performed in vitro experiments. M.A. and F.O.F. performed data analysis. M.R. and Y.D.M. contributed to the implementation of the research, designed, and supervised the study. Y.D.M. wrote the paper with input from all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council, Strategic Research Area Exodiab, Dnr 2009-1039, the Swedish Government Fund for Clinical Research (ALF) and the foundation of Skåne University Hospital.

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

This study was also published on PNAS

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2105968118

Nature, Science, and PNAS are the three most prestigious general-science journals, and Nature and Science are among the most influential journals overall, based on the journal Impact Factor (IF).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341192449_Nature_Science_and_PNAS_disciplinary_profiles_and_impact

Here are natural ways to prevent and treat Covid.

Economist Whistleblower Who Predicted Covid Tyranny Breaks Down How to Fight the Next Lockdown [VIDEO]

June 2, 2022

COVID IS A COVER UP FOR THE GLOBALISITS TO HIDE THE COLLAPSE. cOVID A SYSTEM TO PREVENT RIOTS TO SHIFT THE BLAME FROM POLICY MAKERS TO A VIRUS. wE ARE FACING THE END OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM.

The first time that the dollar is going up along with commodity.

The real reason airlines are closed is because pilots who don’t take the vaccine quit and those who do are failing their tests.

Immunity is 27 times higher without vaccine.

ELITES ARE PREPARING TO MAINTAIN THEIR POWER AFTER THE COMING COLLAPSE

Monkey Pox have been genetically engineered.. Edward Dowd predicts lockdown in October

June 9th 2022m The system is collapsing of its own weight and Covid is just an excuse,

There will be no elections in the Fall, we will bw in lock downm and there will be mail in ballots,

April 5, 2020m federal reserve executive suggests daily testing and health badges,

VACCINE GENOCIDE???: “AS THE TRUTH COMES OUT IT WILL GET WORSE AND THEY WILL TRIPLE-DOWN” 💉💉💉

First published at 08:03 UTC on June 28th, 2022.

Funerol homes have gine up 106% in 2021,

‘Former BlackRock Portfolio Manager, Investor Edward Dowd, Explains Bombshell ‘Fraud’ Charge re Pfizer Hiding Deaths Data; Many Media Outlets are ‘Accomplices to Murder’June 5th, 2022.

EDWARD DOWD – ALARMING INCREASE OF EXCESS MORTALITY AND DISABILITIES SINCE RELEASE OF VAXX July 5th, 2022.m Former executive of blackrock.

US bureau of employment shows disabilty went upfrom 29 million, In 2021 increased to 31.6 million, Is a 10% increase in 1 year, Huge increase in excess mortality in second half of 2021 under professional millenials. Industry wide 40% increase in excess mortality. That is an alarming jump under working age people, That is not a suicidal or drug group. 2 peaks in excess mortalitym the end of 2020m elderly, End of 2021m 84% spike in all cause mortality, along with corperate mandates. 60.000 excess deaths in 1 year. Vietnam was 58 thousand in 10 years. Switch drom respiratory to cardiovascular,

Funeral home stocks peaked in 2021,

Stop taking the vaccine,

Dr Meryl Naas expects side effects will be higher with new boosters with more mRNA.

With vaccine< No immunity at first, then immunity for a month to 6 months, then higher susceptibility,

Long covid is a hoax. It hasn’t even been defined yet.

More millennials died in one year of the covid vax than died in the Vietnam war

Millenials 25 to 44, Fall of 2021 84% excess mortality from baseline.

March 2021 to February 2022″60000 excess deaths in 1 year under millenials, Ten years of Vietnam was 58000, over 10 years. Cardio vascular issues.

EDWARD DOWD – PEOPLE ARE DISAPPEARING SUDDENLY

First published at 01:34 UTC on July 7th, 2022.

According to an Israeli study, natural immunity is 27 times stronger than that induced by COVID vaccines.

AT 29.12.2021

https://www.imuno-medica.ro/news/According-to-an-Israeli-study-natural-immunity-is-27-times-stronger-than-that-induced-by-COVID-vaccines-42

DR NAOMI WOLF HIGHLIGHTS SHOCKING FINDINGS IN THE PFIZER DOCUMENTS UP UNTIL 20-06-22

https://campaigns.dailyclout.io/campaign/brand/cc3b3e5a-6536-4738-8ed6-5ee368c67240

Breastmilk blue green from Poly Ethylene Glycol

34% higher baby die off/

https://campaigns.dailyclout.io/campaign/brand/cc3b3e5a-6536-4738-8ed6-5ee368c67240

FDA Dumps More Pfizer Documents: Why Were So Many Adverse Events Reported as ‘Unrelated’ to Vaccine?

Share

By Michael Nevradikis, Ph.D.

The latest release of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents raises questions about how frequently adverse events experienced by clinical trial participants were reported as “unrelated” to the vaccine.

The 80,000-page document cache released May 2 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) includes an extensive set of Case Report Forms (CRFs) from Pfizer trials conducted at various locations in the U.S.

The documents also include the “third interim report” from BioNTech’s trials conducted in Germany (accompanied by a synopsis of this report and a database of adverse events from this particular set of trials).

The FDA released the documents, which pertain to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the vaccine, as part of a court-ordered disclosure schedule stemming from an expedited Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in August 2021.

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, a group of doctors and public health professionals, submitted the FOIA request.

Adverse events during Pfizer vaccine trials in the U.S. usually reported as ‘unrelated’ to vaccination

Pfizer conducted a series of vaccine trials at various locations in the U.S., including the New York University Langone Health Center, Rochester Clinical Research and Rochester General Hospital (Rochester, New York) and the J. Lewis Research, Inc. Foothill Family Clinic (Salt Lake City, Utah).

The Pfizer documents released this month by the FDA included a series of CRFs for patients who suffered some type of adverse event during their participation in the COVID-19 vaccine trials.

As the documents reveal, despite the occurrence of a wide range of symptoms, including serious cardiovascular events, almost none were identified as being “related” to the vaccine.

Such serious yet “unrelated” adverse events included:

Of the CRFs found in the documents released this month, only one adverse event is clearly specified as being related to the vaccination: a participant who suffered from psoriatic arthritis, with no prior history of the condition.

In addition, several CRFs indicated exposure during pregnancy (see here and here), or during a partner’s pregnancy (see here and here). However, the documents provided do not appear to have provided any follow-ups regarding any outcomes or potential adverse events for the participants, their partners or their newborn babies once born.

In some instances, while the CRFs claimed the adverse events suffered by patients were not related to the vaccine, their cause was unspecified, simply indicated as “other,” while in another case, a participant’s “unplanned” small bowel obstruction and panic attacks were listed as being unrelated to the vaccination despite no relevant medical history pertaining to the SAEs (severe adverse events) in question.

Did Pfizer hide critical information from regulators?

It is difficult to draw concrete conclusions about any specific case from the data provided by CRFs and vaccine trial summaries.

However, what raises eyebrows is the very large number of adverse events — often serious and often requiring the hospitalization of the patients involved — that were determined to be “unrelated” to the administration of the COVID vaccine.

Previously released Pfizer documents also included discrepancies in the recording of adverse events.

According to investigative journalist Sonia Elijah, these discrepancies include:

  • Trial participants were entered into the “healthy population” but were, in actuality, far from healthy.
  • SAE numbers were left blank.
  • Barcodes were missing from samples collected from trial participants.
  • The second vaccine dose was administered outside the three-week protocol window.
  • New health problems were dismissed as “unrelated” to the vaccination.
  • A remarkable number of patients with an observation period of exactly the same duration — 30 minutes, with very little variety in observation times and raising questions as to whether patients were adequately observed or were put at risk.
  • Oddities pertaining to the start and end dates of SAEs – for instance, a “healthy” diabetic suffered a “serious” heart attack on October 27, 2020, but the “end” date for this SAE is listed as the very next day, even though the patient was diagnosed with pneumonia that same day.
  • Impossible dating: in the aforementioned example of the patient who sustained a heart attack and pneumonia, the individual in question later died, but the date of death is indicated as the day before the patient was recorded as having gone to a “COVID ill” visit.
  • Unblinded teams, who were aware of which patients received the actual vaccine or a placebo, were responsible for reviewing adverse event reports, potentially leading to pressure to downplay COVID-related events in the vaccinated, or to indicate that adverse events were related to the vaccine.
  • Other adverse events were indicated as “not serious” despite extensive hospital stays, of up to at least 26 days in the case of one patient who suffered a fall which was classified as “not serious,” yet facial lacerations sustained as a result of the fall were attributed to hypotension (low blood pressure).

Many of these practices seem to appear in the trial-related documents released this month.

Medical and scientific experts who spoke to The Defender expressed similar concerns about what this month’s tranche of documents reveals, and addressed cases of “disappearing” adverse events.

Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense, remarked:

“I’m most concerned about ‘disappearing’ patients. One cannot conduct a valid trial and simply omit the results that they don’t like!

“With the stories about Maddie de Garay and Augusto Roux surfacing, I have to wonder how many other participants were dropped in order to hide vaccine adverse events/effects.

“If you look at the data in VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System], COVID-19 vaccines are the most dangerous ever introduced into the population.”

Dr. Madhava Setty, a board-certified anesthesiologist and senior science editor for The Defender, said:

“The ‘unrelated’ label the investigators use to divert attention from AEs [adverse events] is a powerful point that stands on its own. We haven’t pushed back on this enough.

“Equivalently, we can say that the meager and short-lived benefit of these shots is also ‘unrelated’ using their ‘standards.’ On what grounds can they say that their product is preventing infection (which it isn’t anymore), or death (marginally)?

“They cannot have it both ways. They cannot claim a benefit through short-term outcomes while denying that side effects of any kind are related to their product.

“That’s the whole point of doing a trial. You cannot prove causation, only statistically significant correlation.”

Setty provided further context for his remarks in an April 2022 article for The Defender and in a March 2022 presentation, in which he discussed the number of these adverse events and how Pfizer swept them away (timestamp 24:00).

https://www.citizensjournal.us/fda-dumps-more-pfizer-documents-why-were-so-many-adverse-events-reported-as-unrelated-to-vaccine/

The Defencer, Children’s Health defese, May 17, 2022, Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

05/17/22

COVID › NEWS

FDA Dumps More Pfizer Documents: Why Were So Many Adverse Events Reported as ‘Unrelated’ to Vaccine?

The latest release by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents raises questions about how frequently adverse events experienced by clinical trial participants were reported as “unrelated” to the vaccine.

By 

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

53

Link copied

Pfizer covid vaccine FDA documents

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the DayIt’s free.

The latest release of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents raises questions about how frequently adverse events experienced by clinical trial participants were reported as “unrelated” to the vaccine.

The 80,000-page document cache released May 2 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) includes an extensive set of Case Report Forms (CRFs) from Pfizer trials conducted at various locations in the U.S.

The documents also include the “third interim report” from BioNTech’s trials conducted in Germany (accompanied by a synopsis of this report and a database of adverse events from this particular set of trials).

The FDA released the documents, which pertain to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the vaccine, as part of a court-ordered disclosure schedule stemming from an expedited Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in August 2021.

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, a group of doctors and public health professionals, submitted the FOIA request.

Adverse events during Pfizer vaccine trials in the U.S. usually reported as ‘unrelated’ to vaccination

Pfizer conducted a series of vaccine trials at various locations in the U.S., including the New York University Langone Health Center, Rochester Clinical Research and Rochester General Hospital (Rochester, New York) and the J. Lewis Research, Inc. Foothill Family Clinic (Salt Lake City, Utah).

The Pfizer documents released this month by the FDA included a series of CRFs for patients who suffered some type of adverse event during their participation in the COVID-19 vaccine trials.

As the documents reveal, despite the occurrence of a wide range of symptoms, including serious cardiovascular events, almost none were identified as being “related” to the vaccine.

Such serious yet “unrelated” adverse events included:

1 Million Copies Sold — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ — BUY TODAY!

Of the CRFs found in the documents released this month, only one adverse event is clearly specified as being related to the vaccination: a participant who suffered from psoriatic arthritis, with no prior history of the condition.

In addition, several CRFs indicated exposure during pregnancy (see here and here), or during a partner’s pregnancy (see here and here). However, the documents provided do not appear to have provided any follow-ups regarding any outcomes or potential adverse events for the participants, their partners or their newborn babies once born.

In some instances, while the CRFs claimed the adverse events suffered by patients were not related to the vaccine, their cause was unspecified, simply indicated as “other,” while in another case, a participant’s “unplanned” small bowel obstruction and panic attacks were listed as being unrelated to the vaccination despite no relevant medical history pertaining to the SAEs (severe adverse events) in question.

Did Pfizer hide critical information from regulators?

It is difficult to draw concrete conclusions about any specific case from the data provided by CRFs and vaccine trial summaries.

However, what raises eyebrows is the very large number of adverse events — often serious and often requiring the hospitalization of the patients involved — that were determined to be “unrelated” to the administration of the COVID vaccine.

Previously released Pfizer documents also included discrepancies in the recording of adverse events.

According to investigative journalist Sonia Elijah, these discrepancies include:

  • Trial participants were entered into the “healthy population” but were, in actuality, far from healthy.
  • SAE numbers were left blank.
  • Barcodes were missing from samples collected from trial participants.
  • The second vaccine dose was administered outside the three-week protocol window.
  • New health problems were dismissed as “unrelated” to the vaccination.
  • A remarkable number of patients with an observation period of exactly the same duration — 30 minutes, with very little variety in observation times and raising questions as to whether patients were adequately observed or were put at risk.
  • Oddities pertaining to the start and end dates of SAEs – for instance, a “healthy” diabetic suffered a “serious” heart attack on October 27, 2020, but the “end” date for this SAE is listed as the very next day, even though the patient was diagnosed with pneumonia that same day.
  • Impossible dating: in the aforementioned example of the patient who sustained a heart attack and pneumonia, the individual in question later died, but the date of death is indicated as the day before the patient was recorded as having gone to a “COVID ill” visit.
  • Unblinded teams, who were aware of which patients received the actual vaccine or a placebo, were responsible for reviewing adverse event reports, potentially leading to pressure to downplay COVID-related events in the vaccinated, or to indicate that adverse events were related to the vaccine.
  • Other adverse events were indicated as “not serious” despite extensive hospital stays, of up to at least 26 days in the case of one patient who suffered a fall which was classified as “not serious,” yet facial lacerations sustained as a result of the fall were attributed to hypotension (low blood pressure).

Many of these practices seem to appear in the trial-related documents released this month.

Medical and scientific experts who spoke to The Defender expressed similar concerns about what this month’s tranche of documents reveals, and addressed cases of “disappearing” adverse events.

Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense, remarked:

“I’m most concerned about ‘disappearing’ patients. One cannot conduct a valid trial and simply omit the results that they don’t like!

“With the stories about Maddie de Garay and Augusto Roux surfacing, I have to wonder how many other participants were dropped in order to hide vaccine adverse events/effects.

“If you look at the data in VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System], COVID-19 vaccines are the most dangerous ever introduced into the population.”

Dr. Madhava Setty, a board-certified anesthesiologist and senior science editor for The Defender, said:

“The ‘unrelated’ label the investigators use to divert attention from AEs [adverse events] is a powerful point that stands on its own. We haven’t pushed back on this enough.

“Equivalently, we can say that the meager and short-lived benefit of these shots is also ‘unrelated’ using their ‘standards.’ On what grounds can they say that their product is preventing infection (which it isn’t anymore), or death (marginally)?

“They cannot have it both ways. They cannot claim a benefit through short-term outcomes while denying that side effects of any kind are related to their product.

“That’s the whole point of doing a trial. You cannot prove causation, only statistically significant correlation.”

Setty provided further context for his remarks in an April 2022 article for The Defender and in a March 2022 presentation, in which he discussed the number of these adverse events and how Pfizer swept them away (timestamp 24:00).

WHILE RUSSIA DISTRACTS THE WORLD, PFIZER DOCUMENTS REVEAL DISASTER FOR VACCINATED POPULATION

First published at 17:11 UTC on March 13th, 2022.

Articles on Covid19

Back to top

Back to Index

Standard